CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 7F72

CORE STATE Rome
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 192 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 240W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 2
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 9 270H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
4,518
2,464
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
637
347
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
18,828
10,268
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
2,657
1,449
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
44,829
24,449
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
6,328
3,451
passmark_data_compression
808,795
333,785
passmark_data_encryption
56,261
19,369
passmark_extended_instructions
46,936
20,079
passmark_find_prime_numbers
498
112
passmark_floating_point_math
108,437
70,640
passmark_integer_math
181,103
97,654
passmark_multithread
52,740
28,764
passmark_physics
6,459
1,966
passmark_random_string_sorting
102,436
36,867
passmark_single_thread
2,384
3,944
passmark_singlethread
2,384
3,944

Analysis: AMD EPYC 7F72 vs Intel Core 9 270H

If you're comparing AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD against Intel Intel Core 9 270H processor, the benchmark delta becomes quickly evident. Sporting higher parallel throughput, AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD delivers substantially quicker processing in heavy tasks. This CPU architecture advantage leads clearly into real-world advantages. Test data validates this assessment. Those looking for raw speed will notice the advantages that AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD brings to the table.

Examining the specs, AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD surpasses Intel Intel Core 9 270H processor across many benchmarks. For professional work, this speed delta results in faster performance. Buyers seeking top-tier speed might consider AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD as the stronger choice. Its concurrent performance is notably strong. Current programs progressively take advantage of several execution resources.

This performance gap between AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD and Intel Intel Core 9 270H processor turns notably evident in multi-threaded tasks. Programs like scientific computing highlight AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD's strengths. The extra execution units give considerable performance for demanding tasks. This power leads into reduced processing windows. Productivity advantages are measurable and substantial.

When all is said and done: AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD secures this matchup clearly. Those valuing speed should definitely select AMD EPYC 7F72 by AMD over Intel Intel Core 9 270H processor. The performance data confirms this assessment. The tasks can benefit from the higher throughput. It's a straightforward choice in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 7F72
9 270H
Core Specs
Cores
24
14 -41.7%
Threads
48
20 -58.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.2
2.7 -15.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
5.8 +56.8%
Frequency (GHz)
3.2
2.7 -15.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
5.8 +56.8%
Multiplier
32
27 -15.6%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
96 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
192 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
240
45 -81.3%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 2
Raptor Lake
Codename
Rome
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))
Core 9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
3,800 million
Die Size
74 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 4.1 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$697
Part Number
100-000000141100-000000141WOF
SRQ6V
Package
FCLGA-4094
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 7F72 Details View Core 9 270H Details