AMD EPYC 7371 vs Intel Core i5-4570 Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7371 and Intel Core i5-4570 represent two completely different eras and purposes in computing. The EPYC 7371 is a 16-core server processor built on the Zen architecture, while the Core i5-4570 is a quad-core desktop part from the Haswell generation. Benchmark data shows a complete sweep for the EPYC 7371, but the magnitude and nature of those wins tell a nuanced story about what each processor is actually for.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are unambiguous, with the AMD EPYC 7371 winning all six head-to-head tests by a nearly identical margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the EPYC 7371 scores 2637 against the i5-4570’s 447, a 489.9% delta. The single-core R15 test tells the same story: 372 to 63, a 490.5% advantage. This is not a marginal victory; the EPYC is roughly five times faster in every single benchmark recorded.

The pattern holds across newer Cinebench versions. In R20 multicore, the EPYC 7371 posts 10988 versus 1865 (489.2% delta), and in R20 single-core it scores 1551 against 263 (489.7% delta). Moving to R23, the multicore result is 26164 for the EPYC against 4442 for the i5, a 489% delta, while single-core shows 3693 versus 627, also 489%. The consistency of the 489-490% delta across all tests is striking — it suggests the performance gap is structural rather than workload-dependent.

What makes this interesting is not that the server chip wins, but that it wins by almost exactly the same factor in single-threaded tests as in multi-threaded ones. The i5-4570’s 3.20 GHz base clock and 3.60 GHz boost are actually higher than the EPYC’s 3.10 GHz base, yet the EPYC still dominates single-core scores. This indicates the architectural efficiency of the newer Zen design outweighs the clock speed disadvantage.

The average benchmark scores reflect this broader trend. The EPYC 7371 has an average score of 7568, while the i5-4570 sits at 7421. Notably, both processors share the same 63rd percentile versus all CPUs, meaning they occupy a similar position in the overall distribution despite the massive head-to-head gap. The EPYC’s nearest rivals by average score include the Intel Core i5-6500 at 7569 (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX at 7578 (-0.1% delta), while the i5-4570’s rivals include the Intel Core i9-9990XE at 7415 (0.1% delta) and AMD EPYC 7282 at 7409 (0.2% delta). This suggests that average scores across different benchmark suites can obscure the extreme specialization of each part.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows the AMD EPYC 7371 wins in every recorded benchmark category. There are zero wins for the Intel Core i5-4570 across the six head-to-head Cinebench tests. However, the nature of the wins matters for practical use cases.

The EPYC 7371’s dominance is most pronounced in multi-core workloads. Its R23 multicore score of 26164 is nearly six times the i5-4570’s 4442. This makes the EPYC the clear choice for heavily threaded applications like video rendering, scientific simulation, or database processing. The 16 cores and 32 threads provide massive parallel throughput, and the 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep all those cores fed with data.

The single-core wins are more surprising but still decisive. The EPYC 7371’s R23 single-core score of 3693 dwarfs the i5-4570’s 627. Even in lightly threaded tasks, the newer Zen architecture delivers nearly five times the performance. This means the EPYC doesn’t sacrifice responsiveness for parallelism — it beats the older Intel part even where the i5 should theoretically have an advantage with its higher clock speeds.

The i5-4570 does have one practical edge: it includes integrated graphics (Intel HD 4600), while the EPYC 7371 has no integrated GPU. For a basic desktop system without a discrete graphics card, the i5-4570 can output video immediately. The EPYC requires a separate GPU for any display output. However, this is not a performance benchmark win; it is a functional distinction.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD EPYC 7371 uses the Zen architecture on a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 213 mm² and 4,800 million transistors. The Intel Core i5-4570 uses the Haswell architecture on Intel’s 22 nm process, with a smaller 177 mm² die and 1,400 million transistors. The EPYC packs more than three times the transistors onto a larger die, reflecting its 16-core configuration.

Core counts differ dramatically. The EPYC 7371 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the i5-4570 has 4 cores and 4 threads — no hyperthreading. This 4x core advantage is the primary driver of the multicore benchmark gap. The cache hierarchy also reflects the server-focused design: the EPYC offers 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3, whereas the i5 provides 64 KB L1, 256 KB L2, and only 6 MB shared L3. The EPYC’s 64 MB L3 is over ten times larger than the i5’s cache, which helps sustain throughput on data-heavy server workloads.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The EPYC 7371 supports DDR4 memory across an eight-channel bus with 170.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus native ECC support. The i5-4570 uses DDR3 on a dual-channel bus with no ECC support and no listed bandwidth figure. For server tasks that handle large datasets, the EPYC’s memory bandwidth is a decisive factor — it can move data to and from RAM much faster than the i5 can.

Process node differences matter for efficiency. The EPYC’s 14 nm process is newer than the i5’s 22 nm node, which partially explains how the EPYC delivers so much more performance despite its 170 W TDP versus the i5’s 84 W TDP. The EPYC does consume more power, but it delivers far more work per unit of time. The i5 uses an Intel Socket 1150, while the EPYC uses AMD Socket SP3, meaning they are not interchangeable in any system.

The Verdict

The data is clear: the AMD EPYC 7371 is overwhelmingly faster than the Intel Core i5-4570 in every recorded benchmark. Any workload that can use the EPYC’s 16 cores and 32 threads will see roughly a 489% improvement in Cinebench scores. Even single-threaded performance, where the i5’s higher clock speed might help, goes decisively to the EPYC.

Who should pick the i5-4570? The data supports only one scenario: if you need a processor with integrated graphics for a simple desktop build and do not plan to run any demanding applications. The i5-4570 has Intel HD 4600 graphics, while the EPYC has none. For a basic office machine or a home theater PC where a discrete GPU is unnecessary, the i5-4570’s integrated graphics are a functional advantage. Its 84 W TDP also makes it easier to cool and power in a compact chassis.

Who should pick the EPYC 7371? Anyone whose work involves multi-threaded processing, large datasets, or memory-intensive workloads. The eight-channel DDR4 memory with 170.6 GB/s bandwidth is essential for server applications, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for working sets that fit in cache. The EPYC’s 170 W TDP is substantial, but the performance return is massive. This is a server/workstation processor, and the data confirms it excels at that role.

The fact that both processors share the same 63rd percentile versus all CPUs is a reminder that average benchmark scores can be misleading. The EPYC 7371’s average score of 7568 is just 2% higher than the i5-4570’s 7421, yet in Cinebench the EPYC is nearly five times faster. This discrepancy arises because the i5-4570 has many more benchmark entries (including PassMark tests) that pull its average up relative to its Cinebench performance. The EPYC’s benchmark suite is limited to Cinebench tests, which are heavily multi-threaded and favor its architecture.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD EPYC 7371 than the Intel Core i5-4570 in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The EPYC 7371 scores 26164 versus the i5-4570’s 4442, a 489% delta. The EPYC is nearly six times faster in this test.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-4570 win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The EPYC 7371 wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, and the i5-4570 has zero wins.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD EPYC 7371 supports ECC memory with DDR4 on an eight-channel bus. The Intel Core i5-4570 does not support ECC and uses DDR3.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The EPYC 7371 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the i5-4570 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Do these processors use the same socket?

A: No. The EPYC 7371 uses AMD Socket SP3, while the i5-4570 uses Intel Socket 1150. They are not interchangeable.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570 includes Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. The AMD EPYC 7371 has no integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7371 | Intel Core i5-4570 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 4 |

| Threads | 32 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 3.10 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 170 W | 84 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Intel Socket 1150 |

| Architecture | Zen | Haswell |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 22 nm |

| Transistors | 4,800 million | 1,400 million |

| Die Size | 213 mm² | 177 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 170.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Intel HD 4600 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2018-11-15 | 2013-06-01 |