AMD EPYC 7351P vs Intel Core i9-13900TE Comparison

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD EPYC 7351P outperforms the Intel Core i9-13900TE in every single recorded test. Across six Cinebench benchmarks, the EPYC 7351P wins all six, with a consistent lead of approximately 19.8% to 19.9% in every workload. The Intel i9-13900TE, despite its newer architecture and higher boost clock, does not secure a single victory in this dataset. This is a decisive sweep, indicating a fundamental performance advantage for the AMD part in the tested scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 7351P wins everywhere in this comparison. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 2231 against the Intel’s 1861, a 19.9% advantage. The pattern repeats in single-core R15, with the EPYC scoring 314 versus 262, a 19.8% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the EPYC’s multi-core score is 9296 versus 7758, and its single-core score is 1312 versus 1094, both representing a 19.8-19.9% margin. In the most demanding test, Cinebench R23, the EPYC scores 22135 multi-core and 3125 single-core, while the Intel scores 18472 and 2607 respectively. These are not marginal victories; the EPYC 7351P is consistently about one-fifth faster across the board.

The Intel Core i9-13900TE has no benchmark wins in this dataset. Its average benchmark score is 5342, which is lower than the EPYC’s 5469. Even when considering its nearest rivals, the Intel i9-13900TE sits at the 60th percentile of all CPUs, while the EPYC 7351P sits at the 61st. The Intel part’s performance profile is closer to older high-end desktop parts like the Intel Core i9-10900KF, which it edges out by only 0.5%. It is a capable processor, but in direct comparison, it is outclassed by the EPYC in every measured metric.

The use-case split is therefore simple: for any workload represented by Cinebench—whether single-threaded or multi-threaded—the AMD EPYC 7351P is the superior choice. The data shows no scenario where the Intel i9-13900TE is preferable from a pure performance standpoint.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: choose the AMD EPYC 7351P if you prioritize raw compute performance. The data shows it is 19.9% faster than the Intel Core i9-13900TE in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 19.9% faster in R23 single-core. This performance advantage is consistent across all six Cinebench iterations, making it the definitive winner in this head-to-head.

The Intel Core i9-13900TE, however, should be considered if you need its specific feature set. It includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), which the EPYC 7351P lacks. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the EPYC supports only DDR4. For a desktop system requiring an iGPU or newer memory standards, the Intel part is the only option. But from a pure benchmark perspective, the EPYC 7351P wins every test, making it the performance pick.

There is no statistical ambiguity here. The EPYC 7351P’s average benchmark score is 5469, which is 2.4% higher than the Intel’s 5342. In direct comparison, the EPYC is ahead by 19.9% in the most intensive multi-core test. The Intel i9-13900TE is not a slow processor—it is within 0.8% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X—but it is simply not competitive against the EPYC 7351P in this dataset.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant win for the AMD EPYC 7351P is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 22135 versus the Intel’s 18472. This is a 19.8% delta, representing a substantial performance gap in heavily threaded workloads. The EPYC’s 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 64 MB of shared L3 cache, clearly provide an advantage in this test.

The single-core results are equally one-sided. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the EPYC 7351P scores 3125, which is 19.9% higher than the Intel’s 2607. This is surprising given the Intel’s 5.00 GHz boost clock, but the benchmark results do not lie. The EPYC’s 2.90 GHz boost clock is lower, yet it still delivers a higher score, suggesting architectural efficiency in the Zen design for this workload.

In Cinebench R20, the EPYC scores 9296 multi-core and 1312 single-core, versus the Intel’s 7758 and 1094. The deltas are 19.8% and 19.9%, respectively. The R15 results follow the same pattern: the EPYC scores 2231 multi-core and 314 single-core, while the Intel scores 1861 and 262. Every single test shows a nearly identical 19.8-19.9% advantage for the EPYC, indicating a consistent and predictable performance differential.

The Intel i9-13900TE’s best performance relative to the EPYC is still a loss. Its closest margin is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it trails by 19.9%. There are no tests where the Intel part is closer than a 19.8% deficit. This is a comprehensive victory for the AMD EPYC 7351P.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7351P is faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 22135 versus the Intel Core i9-13900TE’s 18472, a 19.8% advantage. It also wins Cinebench R20 multi-core (9296 vs 7758) and R15 multi-core (2231 vs 1861).

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900TE win any benchmark?

A: No. In the head-to-head data, the AMD EPYC 7351P wins all six recorded benchmarks. The Intel part has zero wins in this dataset.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The AMD EPYC 7351P has an average benchmark score of 5469, while the Intel Core i9-13900TE has an average score of 5342. The EPYC’s average is approximately 2.4% higher.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score?

A: The AMD EPYC 7351P. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3125 versus the Intel’s 2607, a 19.9% lead. It also wins R20 single-core (1312 vs 1094) and R15 single-core (314 vs 262).

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900TE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel i9-13900TE is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF and the AMD EPYC 7281, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. It is 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900X.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD EPYC 7351P is at the 61st percentile, while the Intel Core i9-13900TE is at the 60th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD EPYC 7351P is built on the Zen architecture, codenamed Naples, using a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The transistor count is 4,800 million on a 213 mm² die.

The Intel Core i9-13900TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, but its cache configuration is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Its die size is 257 mm², larger than the AMD part, though its transistor count is not listed in the data.

The memory support diverges significantly. The EPYC 7351P supports DDR4 memory with an eight-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 170.6 GB/s. The Intel i9-13900TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but has a dual-channel memory bus, and its memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. Both processors support ECC memory.

The AMD EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation part on the AMD Socket SP3 platform, while the Intel Core i9-13900TE is a desktop part on the Intel Socket 1700. The EPYC has no integrated graphics, whereas the Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. The EPYC uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: the AMD EPYC 7351P has 16 cores, while the Intel Core i9-13900TE has 24 cores. However, both have 32 threads. The base clock differs dramatically: the EPYC has a base clock of 2.40 GHz, while the Intel has a base clock of 1000.00 MHz. The boost clocks also differ, with the EPYC at 2.90 GHz and the Intel at 5.00 GHz.

The thermal design power (TDP) is a major differentiator. The AMD EPYC 7351P has a TDP of 170 watts, while the Intel Core i9-13900TE has a TDP of just 35 watts. This indicates the Intel part is designed for much lower power consumption.

The cache sizes differ: the EPYC has 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, while the Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is 64 MB shared on the EPYC versus 36 MB shared on the Intel.

The memory bus width differs: the EPYC uses eight-channel memory, while the Intel uses dual-channel. The EPYC’s memory bandwidth is 170.6 GB/s, while the Intel’s is not specified. The EPYC supports only DDR4, while the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

The Intel Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the AMD EPYC 7351P does not. The EPYC is an unlocked multiplier part, while the Intel is locked. The EPYC uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The EPYC is on the AMD Socket SP3, while the Intel is on the Intel Socket 1700.