AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7302P and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G represent opposite poles of AMD’s product stack, yet both share a 2019 release window and the same 63rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The EPYC 7302P is a 16-core server processor built on the Zen 2 architecture, while the Ryzen 3 3200G is a quad-core desktop part with integrated graphics based on the older Zen+ design. Benchmark results show a complete sweep for the EPYC 7302P across all head-to-head tests, but the margin of victory varies dramatically depending on the workload. This analysis breaks down the architectural divide, the specific benchmark deltas, and the use cases where each processor’s design philosophy makes sense.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7302P has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 cores and 4 threads. The EPYC 7302P offers a 4x core advantage and an 8x thread advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The AMD EPYC 7302P scores 27,786 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, versus 5,955 for the Ryzen 3 3200G. This represents a 366.6% advantage for the EPYC 7302P.

Q: Does the Ryzen 3 3200G have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G features Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The AMD EPYC 7302P has no integrated graphics, which is typical for a server processor.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The AMD EPYC 7302P supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. The Ryzen 3 3200G supports dual-channel DDR4 with no bandwidth figure listed in the data.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, which is higher than the EPYC 7302P’s 3.30 GHz boost clock. However, the EPYC 7302P still wins all single-core benchmark tests.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD EPYC 7302P and the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G are listed with an "Active" production status.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is generational and functional. The AMD EPYC 7302P is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Rome, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The Ryzen 3 3200G uses the older Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, on a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries. This process difference is reflected in transistor counts: the EPYC 7302P packs 15,200 million transistors across four 74 mm² dies, while the Ryzen 3 3200G contains 4,940 million transistors on a single 210 mm² die.

Cache hierarchies also differ substantially. The EPYC 7302P provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3 per die, totaling 128 MB of L3 across all dies. The Ryzen 3 3200G offers 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of shared L3. The EPYC 7302P’s 128 MB total L3 is 32 times larger than the Ryzen’s 4 MB.

Memory support further separates the two. The EPYC 7302P uses an eight-channel memory bus with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth and supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 3 3200G uses a dual-channel bus with no ECC support. PCIe connectivity also differs: the EPYC 7302P provides Gen 4 with 128 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 3 3200G is limited to Gen 3.

The most visible feature difference is integrated graphics. The Ryzen 3 3200G includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, making it a complete APU solution. The EPYC 7302P has no integrated graphics, as expected for a server/workstation processor. The Ryzen 3 3200G also has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the EPYC 7302P is locked.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 7302P wins every benchmark comparison in the head-to-head data, but the magnitude of those wins tells a clear story about intended use cases. The EPYC 7302P dominates heavily threaded workloads, as evidenced by its 366.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 366.7% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core. This is a processor designed for server and workstation environments where parallel processing across many cores is the primary requirement.

The Ryzen 3 3200G, despite losing every comparison, has a clear rationale for existing. Its integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics make it suitable for budget desktop systems that do not require a discrete GPU. The Ryzen’s higher boost clock of 4.00 GHz and unlocked multiplier suggest it is intended for users who prioritize single-thread responsiveness and overclocking flexibility over raw multi-core throughput.

The EPYC 7302P’s wins in single-core tests are narrower than its multi-core victories. In Geekbench single-core, the EPYC 7302P leads by only 26%, while in Cinebench R15 single-core the lead expands to 370.2%. This suggests that the EPYC 7302P’s Zen 2 architecture provides a solid single-thread foundation, even if that is not its primary selling point. The Ryzen 3 3200G’s higher clock speeds are not enough to overcome the architectural advantages of the newer Zen 2 design.

For memory-intensive applications, the EPYC 7302P’s eight-channel memory bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth provide a massive advantage over the Ryzen 3 3200G’s dual-channel setup. The EPYC 7302P is the clear choice for database servers, virtualization hosts, and compute clusters. The Ryzen 3 3200G is best suited for entry-level desktops, media centers, or light productivity systems where its integrated graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification category. Core count: 16 vs 4. Thread count: 32 vs 4. Base clock: 3.00 GHz vs 3.60 GHz. Boost clock: 3.30 GHz vs 4.00 GHz. Thermal design power: 155 W vs 65 W.

Socket and platform: the EPYC 7302P uses AMD Socket SP3, while the Ryzen 3 3200G uses AMD Socket AM4. Process node: 7 nm TSMC vs 12 nm GlobalFoundries. Transistor count: 15,200 million vs 4,940 million. Die size: four 74 mm² dies vs a single 210 mm² die.

Cache: the EPYC 7302P has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB L3 per die with 128 MB total L3. The Ryzen 3 3200G has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3.

Memory: both support DDR4, but the EPYC 7302P uses an eight-channel bus with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The Ryzen 3 3200G uses a dual-channel bus with no ECC and no listed bandwidth.

PCIe: Gen 4 with 128 lanes for the EPYC 7302P versus Gen 3 for the Ryzen 3 3200G. Integrated graphics: none versus Radeon Vega 8. Multiplier: locked versus unlocked. Launch MSRP: $825 for the EPYC 7302P; the Ryzen 3 3200G has no listed launch MSRP.

Release dates are close: the EPYC 7302P launched on August 6, 2019, while the Ryzen 3 3200G launched on July 6, 2019. The EPYC 7302P is part of the EPYC 7002 series with the Rome codename, while the Ryzen 3 3200G belongs to the 3000 series with the Picasso codename.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the AMD EPYC 7302P with 8 wins and 0 losses. The most lopsided results come from the Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the EPYC 7302P scores 2,800 versus 600 for the Ryzen 3 3200G, a delta of 366.7%. The single-core result is even more extreme in relative terms: 395 versus 84, a 370.2% advantage for the EPYC 7302P.

Cinebench R20 shows a similar pattern. Multi-core: 11,670 versus 2,501, a 366.6% delta. Single-core: 1,647 versus 352, a 367.9% delta. Cinebench R23 continues the trend with multi-core scores of 27,786 versus 5,955 (366.6% delta) and single-core scores of 3,922 versus 840 (366.9% delta).

The Geekbench results are less one-sided. In multi-core, the EPYC 7302P scores 7,462 versus 2,833, a 163.4% advantage. This is still a decisive win, but the margin is smaller than in Cinebench due to the different workload characteristics. In single-core, the EPYC 7302P scores 1,114 versus 884, a 26% lead. This is the closest comparison in the entire dataset, showing that the Ryzen 3 3200G’s higher boost clock narrows the gap but cannot overcome the EPYC 7302P’s architectural efficiency.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall dominance. The EPYC 7302P has an average benchmark score of 7,100, while the Ryzen 3 3200G averages 6,931. The percentile rankings are identical at 63, but the nearest rivals differ. The EPYC 7302P sits near the Intel Core i9-7980XE (7018 average, 1.2% delta) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 (6992 average, 1.6% delta). The Ryzen 3 3200G’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9960X (6938 average, -0.1% delta) and Intel Core i5-3470 (6906 average, 0.4% delta). The Ryzen 3 3200G also has additional benchmark data from PassMark and 3DMark tests, including a PassMark multi-thread score of 7,007 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 498, but these tests have no corresponding EPYC 7302P results for direct comparison.