AMD EPYC 7302 vs Intel Pentium Gold G7400 Comparison
AMD EPYC 7302
Pentium Gold G7400
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD EPYC 7302 vs Intel Pentium Gold G7400
The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 and the AMD EPYC 7302 occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum, and the benchmark data confirms this stark divide. The G7400 is a 2-core desktop part, while the EPYC 7302 is a 16-core server processor. Across every recorded benchmark, the AMD EPYC 7302 dominates, with the Intel part trailing by roughly 80% in all Cinebench tests. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the architecture and intended use cases could not be more different.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded Cinebench results are unambiguous: the AMD EPYC 7302 wins all six head-to-head comparisons. In multi-core tests, the EPYC 7302 scores 2,836 in Cinebench R15 versus 574 for the G7400, a delta of -79.8%. Moving to Cinebench R20 multicore, the EPYC 7302 posts 11,818 against 2,394, again a -79.7% gap. The largest multi-core margin appears in Cinebench R23, where the EPYC 7302 reaches 28,140 compared to 5,700 for the G7400, representing a -79.7% difference.
Single-core results show the same pattern, though the absolute scores are lower. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the EPYC 7302 scores 400 versus 80 for the G7400, a -80% delta. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1,668 for the EPYC 7302 against 337 for the G7400, a -79.8% gap. Cinebench R23 single-core continues the trend: 3,972 for the EPYC 7302 versus 804 for the G7400, a -79.8% difference.
The consistency of these margins is notable. Across all six tests, the delta hovers between -79.7% and -80%, indicating that the performance difference is not workload-dependent but rather a fundamental throughput advantage. The EPYC 7302’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide a raw compute advantage that the G7400’s 2 cores and 4 threads cannot offset, even in single-threaded tasks where the G7400’s higher base clock of 3.70 GHz might be expected to help.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on entirely different foundations. The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 uses the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S codename, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and no boost clock recorded. The cache hierarchy is modest: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The G7400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but it does not support ECC memory. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. Integrated graphics are present in the form of UHD Graphics 710, and the TDP is 46 watts.
The AMD EPYC 7302 is a fundamentally different design. It belongs to the EPYC 7002 series, using the Zen 2 architecture with the Rome codename. The processor is built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 15,200 million transistors and a die size of 4x 74 mm². It has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The cache configuration is more complex: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, 32 MB of L3 per die, and a total L3 of 128 MB. The EPYC 7302 supports DDR4 memory across an eight-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. It uses the AMD Socket SP3 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes (CPU only). No integrated graphics are present, and the TDP is 155 watts.
These differences extend to the process node and foundry. Intel fabricates the G7400 in-house at 10 nm, while AMD outsources the EPYC 7302 to TSMC at 7 nm. The transistor count difference is substantial: the EPYC 7302’s 15,200 million transistors dwarf the G7400’s unspecified count. The memory architecture also diverges sharply: dual-channel for the G7400 versus eight-channel for the EPYC 7302, which explains the massive bandwidth advantage.
Where Each One Wins
The benchmark results show that the AMD EPYC 7302 wins every recorded test. However, the use-case split is clearer than the raw scores suggest. The EPYC 7302 is designed for server and workstation workloads where multi-threaded performance is paramount. Its 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with 128 MB of L3 cache and 204.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, make it suitable for virtualization, database processing, and heavy compute tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,140 reflects this capability.
The Intel Pentium Gold G7400, by contrast, is a desktop part with a 46-watt TDP. Its strengths lie in low-power operation and basic computing tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 means it can run without a discrete GPU, which suits entry-level desktop builds. The G7400’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility for system builders. Its PassMark single-thread score of 2,982, while not recorded in the head-to-head comparison, indicates reasonable per-core efficiency for its class.
Where each processor wins depends on the priority. For raw throughput, the EPYC 7302 is the clear choice, with its Cinebench R23 multicore score being roughly five times higher than the G7400’s. For compact, low-cost desktop systems where integrated graphics and lower power consumption matter, the G7400 offers a viable path. The EPYC 7302’s 155-watt TDP and server socket requirement make it unsuitable for such builds, while the G7400’s 46-watt TDP and desktop socket are a better fit.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?
A: The AMD EPYC 7302 scores 3,972 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Intel Pentium Gold G7400 scores 804. The EPYC 7302 leads by -79.8%.
Q: What is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R20?
A: The AMD EPYC 7302 scores 11,818, and the Intel Pentium Gold G7400 scores 2,394. This represents a -79.7% difference in favor of the EPYC 7302.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD EPYC 7302 supports ECC memory. The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 does not.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 has 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD EPYC 7302 has 16 cores and 32 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?
A: The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 has a base clock of 3.70 GHz, which is higher than the AMD EPYC 7302’s base clock of 3.00 GHz. However, the EPYC 7302 has a boost clock of 3.30 GHz, while the G7400 has no recorded boost clock.
Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?
A: The AMD EPYC 7302 has a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s via an eight-channel memory bus. The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 uses a dual-channel bus, and no bandwidth figure is recorded for it.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Pentium Gold G7400 offers 2 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD EPYC 7302 provides 16 cores and 32 threads. The base clocks are 3.70 GHz for the G7400 and 3.00 GHz for the EPYC 7302, with the latter adding a 3.30 GHz boost clock. The TDP is 46 watts for the G7400 versus 155 watts for the EPYC 7302.
The sockets are distinct: Intel Socket 1700 for the G7400 and AMD Socket SP3 for the EPYC 7302. The architectures are Alder Lake (Alder Lake-S) for the G7400 and Zen 2 (Rome) for the EPYC 7302. Process nodes differ at 10 nm for Intel and 7 nm for AMD, with the EPYC 7302 using TSMC as the foundry. The EPYC 7302’s transistor count is 15,200 million, while the G7400’s is not recorded; the die size is 4x 74 mm² for the EPYC 7302, with no figure for the G7400.
Cache configurations vary significantly. The G7400 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. The EPYC 7302 has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, 32 MB L3 per die, and 128 MB total L3. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the G7400 with a dual-channel bus, versus DDR4 for the EPYC 7302 with an eight-channel bus. The EPYC 7302’s memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s, while no figure is recorded for the G7400. ECC memory is supported only on the EPYC 7302.
PCIe generations differ: Gen 5 for the G7400 and Gen 4 with 128 lanes for the EPYC 7302. The G7400 includes integrated UHD Graphics 710, while the EPYC 7302 has no integrated graphics. Market segments are Desktop for the G7400 and Server/Workstation for the EPYC 7302. Release dates are January 2022 for the G7400 and August 2019 for the EPYC 7302. Launch MSRP is $74 for the G7400 and $978 for the EPYC 7302. Both processors have locked multipliers. The part numbers are SRL66 for the G7400 and 100-000000043 for the EPYC 7302.