AMD EPYC 7301 vs Intel Xeon E-2276G Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7301 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G boosts to 4.90 GHz, notably higher than the AMD EPYC 7301's 2.70 GHz boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD EPYC 7301 and the Intel Xeon E-2276G support ECC memory.

Q: Which CPU has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G includes HD Graphics P630, while the AMD EPYC 7301 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each?

A: The AMD EPYC 7301 has an average benchmark score of 3685, while the Intel Xeon E-2276G has an average score of 3614.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD EPYC 7301 ranks at the 56th percentile, slightly ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2276G at the 55th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD EPYC 7301 is built on the Zen architecture with the Naples codename, part of the EPYC 7001 series. It uses a 14 nm process node fabricated by GlobalFoundries, with 4,800 million transistors on a 213 mm² die. The Intel Xeon E-2276G uses the Coffee Lake architecture with the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, part of the Xeon E-2200 series. It also uses a 14 nm process node, but fabricated by Intel, with a smaller 154 mm² die size.

The core layouts differ substantially. The EPYC 7301 has 16 cores and 32 threads, a configuration aimed at heavily parallel server workloads. The Xeon E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads, a more modest count for a workstation-oriented part. Cache hierarchies reflect these different design goals: the EPYC 7301 has 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, plus a large 64 MB shared L3 cache. The Xeon E-2276G has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, with only 12 MB shared L3.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The EPYC 7301 supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 170.6 GB/s, while the Xeon E-2276G uses dual-channel DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s. The EPYC 7301 also has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Xeon E-2276G is locked. Both support PCIe Gen 3, but the Intel part lists 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD part does not specify lane count in the data.

The Xeon E-2276G includes integrated HD Graphics P630, a feature absent from the EPYC 7301. The AMD chip is marked as Active production status, while the Intel chip is End-of-life. The EPYC 7301 was released on 2017-06-28, and the Xeon E-2276G on 2019-05-28. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $362. Socket types also differ: AMD Socket SP3 for the EPYC, Intel Socket 1151 for the Xeon.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 7301 wins every head-to-head benchmark in the recorded data, across all six Cinebench tests. Its 16 cores and 32 threads give it a clear advantage in multi-threaded rendering workloads, and it also edges out the Xeon in single-threaded tests despite the Xeon's much higher clock speed.

The Intel Xeon E-2276G has no benchmark wins in the head-to-head comparison. However, its strengths lie outside the recorded Cinebench metrics. Its integrated graphics capability makes it suitable for systems that need display output without a separate GPU. Its lower TDP of 80 watts versus 170 watts suggests it draws less power, and its 4.90 GHz boost clock is the highest boost among the two, which could benefit lightly threaded tasks not captured in these specific tests. The Xeon also has a smaller die and dual-channel memory, which may simplify motherboard design for compact workstations.

In terms of nearest rivals, the EPYC 7301 sits close to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X, with only a 0.3% difference in average score. The Xeon E-2276G is nearly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, showing a 0% delta. These comparisons place both processors in a similar overall performance tier despite their architectural differences.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights where the two processors differ in their recorded specifications:

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7301 | Intel Xeon E-2276G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 6 |

| Threads | 32 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 2.70 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 170 W | 80 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Zen | Coffee Lake |

| Codename | Naples | Coffee Lake-S WS |

| Die Size | 213 mm² | 154 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 170.6 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | None | HD Graphics P630 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2017-06-28 | 2019-05-28 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $362 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part Number | PS7301BEVGPAF | SR3WS |

Both use DDR4 memory, both support ECC, and both use PCIe Gen 3. The EPYC 7301 has more transistors (4,800 million) than the Xeon, whose transistor count is not recorded. The foundries differ as well: GlobalFoundries for AMD, Intel for the Xeon.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD EPYC 7301 wins all six Cinebench comparisons in the head-to-head data. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the EPYC scores 1284 against the Xeon's 1205, a 6.6% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a 7.1% lead, with the EPYC at 181 and the Xeon at 169. This is notable because the Xeon has a much higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz, yet the EPYC still manages to outperform it in single-threaded rendering.

Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern. In multicore, the EPYC scores 5351 versus 5021, again a 6.6% margin. In single-core, the EPYC scores 755 against 708, also a 6.6% difference. The consistency of the 6.6% delta across multiple tests suggests a stable performance gap rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

Cinebench R23 continues the trend. The EPYC scores 12742 in multicore compared to the Xeon's 11957, a 6.6% advantage. In single-core, the EPYC scores 1798 against 1688, a 6.5% difference. Across all six tests, the EPYC's smallest margin is 6.5% and its largest is 7.1%, showing a uniform lead in this benchmark suite.

The Xeon E-2276G has additional Geekbench scores recorded in its own benchmark list: 6551 in multicore and 1610 in single-core. No comparable Geekbench result exists for the EPYC 7301 in the data, so a direct comparison in that test is not possible. The average benchmark scores further confirm the overall picture: the EPYC 7301 averages 3685, while the Xeon averages 3614, a difference of about 2%.

The Verdict

The data points clearly toward the AMD EPYC 7301 for anyone prioritizing raw Cinebench performance. It wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark, with margins between 6.5% and 7.1%. Its 16 cores, 32 threads, 64 MB shared L3 cache, and eight-channel memory with 170.6 GB/s bandwidth make it the stronger choice for multi-threaded server and workstation workloads.

The Intel Xeon E-2276G is the pick for different reasons. Its 80 watt TDP is less than half the EPYC's 170 watts, and its 4.90 GHz boost clock is the highest between the two. The integrated HD Graphics P630 eliminates the need for a separate GPU in basic display scenarios. Its dual-channel memory and smaller die may fit simpler, lower-power workstation builds. The Xeon also has a recorded launch MSRP of $362, while the EPYC has no recorded launch MSRP.

The percentile rankings tell a nuanced story. The EPYC 7301 sits at the 56th percentile, the Xeon at 55th, a narrow gap that reflects their similar average scores. The EPYC's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X with only a 0.3% difference, while the Xeon's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 with a 0% delta. Both processors are essentially mid-pack performers in the broader CPU landscape.

For a database-driven decision: if the workload is Cinebench-style rendering or heavily parallel compute, the AMD EPYC 7301 is the clear winner on performance. If the priority is lower power draw, integrated graphics, or a newer release date with a higher boost clock, the Intel Xeon E-2276G offers those features, albeit with lower benchmark scores in every recorded comparison. The production status also differs: the EPYC is Active, while the Xeon is End-of-life, which may matter for long-term system planning.