AMD EPYC 7282 vs Intel Core i7-13700E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD EPYC 7282 and Intel Core i7-13700E is unusually one-sided. Across all six recorded Cinebench tests, the Intel Core i7-13700E takes every win, with a consistent delta of -8.3 percent relative to the AMD part in each case. That means the EPYC 7282 trails by the exact same margin in both single-core and multi-core workloads, which points to a systematic performance gap rather than workload-specific behavior.

Looking at the multi-core numbers, the Intel chip scores 2816 in Cinebench R15 multi-core versus 2581 for the EPYC 7282. In R20 multi-core, the margin is 11735 against 10758. The R23 multi-core test shows 27941 for Intel and 25616 for AMD. These are not small differences; the Intel processor is ahead by roughly 8.3 percent across all three multi-core iterations of the benchmark suite. The consistency of the delta is notable, because it suggests the advantage is tied to fundamental architectural efficiency rather than any single test favoring one design.

Single-core results follow the same pattern. The Intel Core i7-13700E records 397 in Cinebench R15 single-core, while the EPYC 7282 manages 364. In R20 single-core, the scores are 1656 versus 1518. The R23 single-core test shows 3944 for Intel and 3616 for AMD. Again, the delta is exactly -8.3 percent for the AMD part. This uniformity across different benchmark versions and across single versus multi-threaded workloads is remarkable. It implies the per-core performance difference is stable and predictable, which is unusual in CPU comparisons where scaling behavior often varies.

The average benchmark score in the database reinforces the overall picture. The Intel Core i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957, placing it in the 64th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The AMD EPYC 7282 averages 7409, which lands in the 63rd percentile. The percentile gap is small, only one point, but the raw average score difference is 548 points, or about 7.4 percent in favor of Intel. This aligns closely with the consistent 8.3 percent deltas seen in the head-to-head Cinebench runs.

It is worth examining what the nearest rivals say about each processor's competitive position. The EPYC 7282's closest comparable in the database is the Intel Core i9-9990XE with an average score of 7415, a delta of -0.1 percent. That is essentially a tie. The Intel Core i5-4570 scores 7421, which is 0.2 percent above the EPYC 7282. The Intel Core i5-7400 sits 0.8 percent higher. These are older desktop parts, and the fact that the EPYC 7282 lands in their vicinity shows that its raw compute performance, while respectable for its server class, is not exceptional in the broader CPU landscape.

For the Intel Core i7-13700E, the nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7551P with an average score of 7952, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i9-10980XE is 0.6 percent behind. The Intel Xeon Gold 6326 and Xeon Platinum 8180M are 1.4 percent and 1.9 percent ahead respectively. This places the i7-13700E in the company of high-end workstation and server parts, which is impressive for a desktop-oriented CPU.

The fact that the Intel part beats the AMD EPYC in every recorded benchmark, despite the EPYC having more threads (32 versus 24), is telling. The EPYC 7282 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the i7-13700E has 16 cores and 24 threads. The AMD chip should theoretically have more raw thread throughput, yet it loses in multi-core tests. This suggests the Intel architecture extracts more useful work per thread, likely due to higher clock speeds and better memory latency characteristics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3944 versus 3616 for the AMD EPYC 7282, a delta of -8.3 percent for the AMD part. The same margin appears in R15 and R20 single-core tests.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E leads by 8.3 percent in all multi-core Cinebench tests. For example, in R23 multi-core, Intel scores 27941 while AMD scores 25616. The difference is consistent across R15, R20, and R23 versions.

Q: Does the AMD EPYC 7282 win any benchmark in this comparison?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows zero wins for the AMD EPYC 7282 and six wins for the Intel Core i7-13700E. Every Cinebench test, both single and multi-core, favors the Intel processor.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957, while the AMD EPYC 7282 averages 7409. This places Intel in the 64th percentile of all CPUs and AMD in the 63rd percentile.

Q: How does the EPYC 7282 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The EPYC 7282 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-9990XE (delta -0.1 percent) and the Intel Core i5-4570 (delta -0.2 percent). It trails the Intel Core i5-7400 by 0.8 percent. These are all older desktop parts, indicating the EPYC's raw benchmark scores are not competitive with modern high-end CPUs.

Q: What does the Intel Core i7-13700E's rival comparison show?

A: The i7-13700E is 0.1 percent ahead of the AMD EPYC 7551P and 0.6 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-10980XE. It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 by 1.4 percent and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M by 1.9 percent. This shows it competes with workstation and server-class silicon.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD EPYC 7282 is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Rome, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It is a server and workstation part using the AMD Socket SP3 platform. The Intel Core i7-13700E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It targets the desktop segment with the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The process node difference is significant. TSMC's 7 nm process used for the EPYC 7282 allows a transistor count of 7,600 million spread across two dies, each measuring 74 mm². The Intel part uses a monolithic 257 mm² die, with the database not listing a transistor count. The AMD design is chiplet-based, with two separate compute dies, while Intel uses a single larger die. This structural difference affects how the two processors scale in multi-socket configurations and how they manage thermal density.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The EPYC 7282 allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3 per die, for a total of 64 MB of L3. The Intel Core i7-13700E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. The AMD part has more total L3 cache at 64 MB versus 30 MB, but the Intel part has larger per-core L2 cache. The L3 arrangement also differs: AMD's is per-die, while Intel's is shared across all cores.

Memory support is another major divergence. The EPYC 7282 supports DDR4 memory with an eight-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. The i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but uses a dual-channel memory bus, and the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure. The eight-channel configuration of the EPYC is designed for high-throughput server workloads, while the dual-channel setup of the Intel part is typical for desktop use. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for the desktop-class Intel part.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The EPYC 7282 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU. The i7-13700E offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The EPYC's lane count is massive and intended for many expansion cards, storage controllers, and network adapters in server environments. The Intel part has far fewer lanes but uses a newer PCIe generation, which offers higher per-lane bandwidth.

Clock speeds tell a story of different priorities. The EPYC 7282 has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.20 GHz. The i7-13700E has a base clock of 1900.00 MHz, which is lower, but a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is dramatically higher. The Intel part relies on aggressive boosting to deliver its performance, while the AMD part runs at more modest, sustained clocks suited to always-on server operation. The Intel chip also has an unlocked multiplier, while the EPYC 7282 does not.

The integrated graphics situation differs as well. The i7-13700E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the EPYC 7282 has no integrated graphics. This is consistent with their market segments: server CPUs typically rely on discrete graphics or remote management, while desktop parts often benefit from an iGPU for basic display output.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion for raw benchmark performance: the Intel Core i7-13700E is the faster processor in every measured workload. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests with a consistent 8.3 percent margin, and its average benchmark score of 7957 exceeds the EPYC 7282's 7409 by a substantial amount. For anyone prioritizing raw compute speed in single-threaded or multi-threaded applications, the Intel part is the better choice based on the recorded measurements.

However, the EPYC 7282 is not without purpose. Its eight-channel DDR4 memory bus, 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and 64 MB of L3 cache are tailored for server and workstation environments where memory bandwidth and expansion capacity matter more than raw Cinebench scores. The Intel part's dual-channel memory and 16 PCIe lanes limit its suitability for memory-intensive or heavily expanded systems. The EPYC also has more threads at 32 versus 24, which could benefit certain highly parallel server workloads even if the measured multi-core benchmarks do not show an advantage.

The release dates are far apart. The EPYC 7282 launched in August 2019, while the i7-13700E arrived in January 2023. The nearly three-and-a-half year gap explains much of the performance difference. The EPYC 7282 uses older Zen 2 architecture, while the i7-13700E uses newer Raptor Lake. The Intel part benefits from years of architectural improvements, including higher clock speeds and better instruction-level efficiency.

The market segments are also distinct. The EPYC 7282 is a server and workstation processor with a launch MSRP of $650. The i7-13700E is a desktop processor with no launch MSRP recorded in the database. The EPYC targets data centers and professional workstations, while the i7-13700E targets desktop builders and enthusiasts. Choosing between them depends entirely on the intended use case, not just benchmark scores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7282 | Intel Core i7-13700E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 16 |

| Threads | 32 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.80 GHz | 1900.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 120 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rome | Raptor Lake-S |

| Process Node | 7 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 2x 74 mm² | 257 mm² |

| Transistors | 7,600 million | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB per die, 64 MB total | 30 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 128 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2019-08-06 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $650 | Not listed |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700E wins in every measured benchmark category. It is faster in single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests across R15, R20, and R23 versions. Its higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz gives it a significant advantage in lightly threaded tasks that rely on single-core speed. The 8.3 percent lead in every test suggests this advantage is uniform and reliable. The Intel part also benefits from a higher average benchmark score of 7957 versus 7409, placing it in the 64th percentile versus the 63rd percentile for AMD. For desktop users running applications like rendering, compilation, or general productivity, the i7-13700E is the clear winner based on the recorded data.

The AMD EPYC 7282 does not win any benchmark in this comparison, but its specification sheet reveals where it could hold value outside of Cinebench. The eight-channel DDR4 memory bus with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth is a massive advantage for workloads that are memory-bound, such as large database operations, virtualization hosts, or scientific computing. The 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for many GPUs, NVMe drives, and network cards, making it suitable for dense server configurations. The 64 MB of total L3 cache is double the Intel part's 30 MB, which could help with certain cache-sensitive workloads. The 32 threads versus 24 also offer more parallel capacity, even if the measured multi-core benchmarks do not reflect a win.

The EPYC 7282's 120 W TDP is higher than the i7-13700E's 65 W, but for a server part with eight-channel memory and 128 PCIe lanes, that power budget is allocated across a much larger system footprint. The Intel part's lower TDP and unlocked multiplier make it attractive for desktop builders who want overclocking headroom and lower power consumption. The i7-13700E also includes UHD Graphics 770, allowing for a system to run without a discrete GPU, which the EPYC cannot do.

For server and workstation deployments where memory bandwidth, PCIe expansion, and thread count are the primary concerns, the EPYC 7282's architecture is better suited despite losing the Cinebench comparisons. For desktop workloads where clock speed, single-thread performance, and power efficiency matter more, the i7-13700E is the better choice. The data does not support the EPYC 7282 as a faster CPU in any measured test, but its platform features address a different set of priorities.