AMD EPYC 7262 vs Intel Core i7-1375PRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the AMD EPYC 7262 across every Cinebench iteration in the database. The margin is narrow but consistent, with the EPYC 7262 winning all six head-to-head tests by a delta of 2.4% to 2.5%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the EPYC 7262 scores 1780 against the Core i7-1375PRE’s 1737, a 2.5% advantage. Single-core R15 shows the same pattern: 251 versus 245, a 2.4% lead for the EPYC part.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the EPYC 7262 posts 7418 multi-core and 1047 single-core, while the Intel chip records 7239 and 1021 respectively. Both deltas sit at 2.5%. The R23 results mirror this exactly: 17662 versus 17236 multi-core, and 2493 versus 2433 single-core, again a 2.5% gap in both cases. The consistency of these margins across every test suggests a stable performance differential rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

What makes this interesting is the hardware mismatch. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the EPYC 7262 has just 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite the core count disadvantage, the EPYC part leads in multi-threaded workloads. The data indicates that the EPYC 7262’s per-core throughput and memory subsystem compensate for its lower core count. The average benchmark score for the EPYC 7262 is 5109, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. The Core i7-1375PRE averages 4985, sitting at the 59th percentile. The delta between their average scores is roughly 2.5%, consistent with the head-to-head results.

It is also worth noting the nearest rivals for each part. The EPYC 7262’s closest competitor is the Intel Core i9-7900X with an average score of 5120, a -0.2% delta, meaning the EPYC is essentially tied with that chip. The Core i7-1375PRE’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12600HE at 4980, a 0.1% delta, also a near tie. These comparisons frame both processors as mid-pack performers in the broader database, with the EPYC holding a slight edge.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins more benchmark tests in the database?

A: The AMD EPYC 7262 wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE wins none. The margins range from 2.4% to 2.5% in favor of the EPYC part.

Q: Does the Intel chip’s higher core count give it any multi-threaded advantage?

A: No. Despite having 14 cores and 20 threads versus 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel part trails in every multi-core test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the EPYC 7262 scores 17662 versus 17236, a 2.5% lead for the AMD chip.

Q: How do these chips compare to their nearest rivals in the database?

A: The EPYC 7262’s average score of 5109 is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-7900X (5120) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850HE (5095). The Core i7-1375PRE’s average of 4985 is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-12600HE (4980) and 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992).

Q: What is the single-core performance difference?

A: The EPYC 7262 leads in all three single-core tests. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 251 versus 245 (2.4%), R20 shows 1047 versus 1021 (2.5%), and R23 shows 2493 versus 2433 (2.5%).

Q: Are these chips in different market segments?

A: Yes. The EPYC 7262 is a Server/Workstation part on AMD Socket SP3, while the Core i7-1375PRE is a Mobile processor on Intel BGA 1744. Their sockets are incompatible.

Q: Does the Intel part have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i7-1375PRE includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The EPYC 7262 has no integrated graphics in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The EPYC 7262 wins in raw CPU compute across every recorded benchmark. If the workload is purely Cinebench-style rendering or general multi-threaded processing, the EPYC part takes the lead in every scenario. Its 128 MB total L3 cache and eight-channel DDR4 memory support provide a substantial memory bandwidth advantage, listed at 204.8 GB/s, which likely contributes to its consistent edge.

The Core i7-1375PRE, despite losing all benchmarks, wins on platform flexibility and mobility. It is a mobile chip with a 28 W TDP, versus the EPYC’s 155 W. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes integrated Iris Xe Graphics, and fits into a BGA 1744 socket. This makes it suitable for compact, power-conscious systems where the EPYC’s server-class requirements are not feasible.

The EPYC 7262 also wins on PCIe expansion, offering 128 Gen 4 lanes versus the Intel part’s 20 lanes. For workstation or server workloads that need many NVMe drives, GPUs, or network cards, the EPYC provides far more headroom. The Intel part’s advantage lies in its integrated graphics and dual-channel memory simplicity, which suits smaller form factors.

In terms of production status, both are listed as Active, so neither is obsolete. The EPYC 7262 was released in 2019, while the Core i7-1375PRE arrived in 2023. The newer Intel part offers modern mobile features, but the older EPYC still outpaces it in compute benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The EPYC 7262 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are drastically different: the EPYC runs at 3.20 GHz, while the Intel chip lists a base clock of 1900.00 MHz (1.90 GHz). Boost clocks favor Intel: 4.80 GHz versus the EPYC’s 3.40 GHz. TDP is a major gap, with the EPYC at 155 W and the Intel at 28 W.

Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket SP3 versus Intel BGA 1744. Process nodes differ, 7 nm for AMD (TSMC foundry) versus 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The EPYC uses a 4x 74 mm² die configuration with 15,200 million transistors, while the Intel part uses a single 217 mm² die with no transistor count listed.

Cache structures are also distinct. The EPYC has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB L3 per die, totaling 128 MB. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support: the EPYC uses DDR4 with an eight-channel bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth; the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the EPYC but not on the Intel part. The EPYC offers 128 Gen 4 PCIe lanes, while the Intel chip offers 20. The EPYC has no integrated graphics; the Intel part has Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Architecture Differences

The EPYC 7262 is built on AMD’s Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Rome, part of the EPYC 7002 series. It uses a chiplet design with four dies, each 74 mm², manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The 128 MB total L3 cache is distributed as 32 MB per die, and the processor connects to an eight-channel DDR4 memory controller. This architecture targets server and workstation workloads where memory bandwidth and PCIe capacity are critical.

The Core i7-1375PRE uses Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-P, part of the Core i7 generation. It is a monolithic die of 217 mm² on Intel’s 10 nm process. The hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the core type split. It uses a 24 MB shared L3 cache and a dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. Integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is built into the die, which is a notable feature absent from the EPYC.

The EPYC’s Zen 2 design emphasizes scalability and memory throughput, with eight-channel memory and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Intel part prioritizes power efficiency and integration, with a 28 W TDP and onboard graphics. The EPYC’s 7 nm process from TSMC contrasts with Intel’s 10 nm process, though the database does not provide performance-per-watt metrics. The EPYC supports ECC memory, which is critical for server reliability, while the Intel part does not.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on use case. For compute-heavy workloads in a server or workstation chassis, the AMD EPYC 7262 is the better choice. It wins every benchmark in the database, despite having fewer cores. Its 128 MB L3 cache, eight-channel memory, and 128 PCIe lanes make it a strong foundation for rendering, virtualization, or data-intensive tasks. The 155 W TDP is high, but the socket and platform are designed for sustained server operation.

The Intel Core i7-1375PRE is the pick for a mobile or compact system where power draw and integrated graphics matter. Its 28 W TDP is a fraction of the EPYC’s, and the included Iris Xe Graphics eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display tasks. The dual-channel memory and 20 PCIe lanes are sufficient for typical laptop or mini-PC workloads. It trails the EPYC in raw compute, but its platform advantages are real.

Who should buy which? If the system stays in a rack or a tower with ample cooling and power, the EPYC 7262’s benchmark lead justifies its selection. If the system must travel, fit in a small chassis, or run on battery, the Core i7-1375PRE is the only viable option between the two. The EPYC wins on performance, the Intel wins on efficiency and integration. The database shows no scenario where the Intel chip overtakes the EPYC in Cinebench, so the decision rests entirely on platform requirements rather than speed.