AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G Comparison

The AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G are both 7 nm AMD processors, but they target radically different markets. The EPYC 7262 is a server/workstation part built on the Zen 2 architecture for Socket SP3, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G is a desktop chip using Zen 3 on Socket AM4. Despite their contrasting designs, the benchmark data shows they are surprisingly close in raw compute performance, though the EPYC 7262 holds a consistent, if narrow, edge across all measured Cinebench tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals a clean sweep for the AMD EPYC 7262, but the margins are remarkably thin. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the EPYC 7262 scores 1780 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G’s 1762, a lead of just 1%. The single-core R15 run tells a similar story, with the EPYC 7262 posting 251 versus 248, a 1.2% advantage.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the EPYC 7262 again takes the multicore crown with 7418 points, edging out the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G’s 7345 by 1%. In the R20 single-core test, the EPYC 7262’s 1047 score beats the 1036 of the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, a 1.1% gap. The pattern holds in the latest Cinebench R23 iteration: the EPYC 7262 reaches 17662 in multicore versus 17490 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, and 2493 versus 2469 in single-core, both exactly 1% apart.

The data shows that the EPYC 7262 wins all six head-to-head comparisons, but the average delta is just over 1%. This is notable because the EPYC 7262 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G’s higher clock speeds—3.90 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost versus 3.20 GHz and 3.40 GHz for the EPYC 7262—help it close much of the core-count gap, but not entirely. Benchmark results indicate that the EPYC 7262’s additional two cores provide just enough throughput to stay ahead in every workload tested.

When placed in the broader market context, both processors sit at nearly identical performance percentiles. The EPYC 7262 ranks in the 60th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 5109, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G ranks in the 59th percentile with an average score of 5002. The nearest rivals for the EPYC 7262 include the Intel Core i9-7900X (score 5120, delta -0.2%) and the Intel Core i7-11850HE (score 5095, delta 0.3%). The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G’s closest competitor is the Intel Core i5-13500TE, which matches its 5002 score exactly at a 0% delta, followed by the Intel Core i3-12300HE at 4995 (0.1% delta).

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split is Zen 2 versus Zen 3. The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 architecture under the codename “Rome,” while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G employs Zen 3, codenamed “Cezanne.” Both are fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process, but the similarities end there. The EPYC 7262 packs 15,200 million transistors across a complex multi-die design consisting of four 74 mm² chiplets, whereas the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G integrates 10,700 million transistors on a single 180 mm² die.

Cache configurations diverge significantly. The EPYC 7262 has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, but its L3 cache is organized as 32 MB per die, totaling 128 MB across the four dies. The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G also has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, but its L3 cache is a single 16 MB pool. This 8x difference in total L3 cache is a defining characteristic of the EPYC 7262, reflecting its server pedigree where large datasets and many concurrent threads are common.

Memory support highlights another major divergence. The EPYC 7262 supports DDR4 across an eight-channel memory bus, delivering 204.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G also uses DDR4 but over a dual-channel bus, yielding 51.2 GB/s—exactly one quarter of the EPYC 7262’s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory, but the PCIe capabilities differ: the EPYC 7262 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G provides PCIe Gen 3 with just 16 lanes.

The EPYC 7262 has no integrated graphics, as expected for a server part, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G includes Radeon Vega 7 graphics. The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G also has a much lower TDP of 65 watts versus 155 watts for the EPYC 7262, though the EPYC 7262’s higher power envelope is typical for a Socket SP3 processor. The EPYC 7262 was released on 2019-08-06 with a launch MSRP of $575, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G launched later on 2021-05-31 with no listed MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

Based on benchmark results, the EPYC 7262 wins every Cinebench test, but the real-world use cases are more nuanced. The EPYC 7262’s advantage lies in its multicore throughput and massive memory bandwidth. The data shows it leads by 1% in Cinebench R23 multicore, but its eight-channel memory subsystem and 128 MB of L3 cache make it the better fit for memory-intensive server workloads, virtualized environments, or large-scale database operations where the 204.8 GB/s bandwidth can be fully utilized.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, despite losing all head-to-head benchmarks, is competitive due to its higher clock speeds. Its 4.40 GHz boost clock is a full 1.0 GHz higher than the EPYC 7262’s 3.40 GHz, which explains why the single-core scores are so close (2493 versus 2469 in R23). For desktop users running lighter threads, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G’s performance is nearly identical to the EPYC 7262, but it does so at a 65-watt TDP, making it far more efficient for desktop use.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G also has the integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, which is absent on the EPYC 7262. This makes the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G a viable option for systems that need a display output without a discrete GPU, a scenario where the EPYC 7262 cannot compete. However, for any purely compute-focused task in the Cinebench suite, the EPYC 7262’s extra two cores and 16 threads give it an unbroken, though narrow, winning record.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 7262 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How much faster is the EPYC 7262 in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The EPYC 7262 scores 2493 versus 2469 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, a 1% advantage.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The EPYC 7262 supports eight-channel DDR4 with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon Vega 7, whereas the EPYC 7262 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity of each processor?

A: The EPYC 7262 has 32 MB per die for a total of 128 MB, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G has 16 MB total.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G boosts to 4.40 GHz, compared to the EPYC 7262’s 3.40 GHz.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the AMD EPYC 7262 and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G:

| Specification | AMD EPYC 7262 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G |

|---|---|---|

| Series | EPYC 7002 series | 5000 series |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 155 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Rome | Cezanne |

| Transistors | 15,200 million | 10,700 million |

| Die Size | 4x 74 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (per die), 128 MB total | 16 MB |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 128 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2019-08-06 | 2021-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $575 | null |

| Part Number | 100-000000041 | 100-000000255 |