AMD EPYC 7252 vs Intel Core i5-1340P Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1340P and the AMD EPYC 7252 occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark scores place them surprisingly close in overall performance. The i5-1340P is a mobile-focused Raptor Lake part with 12 cores and 16 threads, while the EPYC 7252 is a server-grade Rome chip with 8 cores and 16 threads. Across the recorded Cinebench tests, the AMD EPYC 7252 wins every single matchup, though by a narrow margin of roughly 4.7% to 4.8% in each case. The database places the i5-1340P at the 58th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4545, while the EPYC 7252 sits at the 59th percentile with an average score of 4772. These figures suggest that despite their vastly different designs, the two processors deliver comparable compute throughput in the specific workloads measured.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a clean sweep for the AMD EPYC 7252 across all six Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the EPYC 7252 scores 1662 against the i5-1340P's 1584, a difference of 4.7% in favor of the AMD chip. The single-core R15 test follows the same pattern: 234 for the EPYC 7252 versus 223 for the i5-1340P, again a 4.7% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 6929 for the EPYC 7252 and 6600 for the i5-1340P, with the delta holding at 4.7%. The R20 single-core test shows 978 versus 931, a 4.8% difference. In Cinebench R23, the most demanding of the set, the EPYC 7252 posts 16499 in multicore against 15716 for the Intel part, a 4.7% lead, and 2329 in single-core versus 2218, a 4.8% lead.

The consistency of these deltas is notable. Every test lands within a narrow band of 4.7% to 4.8%, which strongly suggests that the two processors are not wildly different in raw execution capability for these workloads. The EPYC 7252 wins each time, but the margins are modest. For a user coming from the i5-1340P, the EPYC 7252 would feel incrementally faster, not transformative. Conversely, the i5-1340P loses every test but by such a small amount that the practical difference in daily use might be imperceptible outside of sustained heavy rendering.

The average benchmark scores reinforce this picture. The i5-1340P averages 4545 across all recorded benchmarks, while the EPYC 7252 averages 4772. The nearest rivals in the database for the i5-1340P include the Intel Core i7-10700KF with an average score of 4547 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Xeon E-2356G at 4548 with a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 at 4532 with a delta of 0.3%. For the EPYC 7252, the closest competitors are the Intel Xeon W-1290E at 4775 with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-1350P at 4776 with a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Xeon E-2386G at 4799 with a delta of -0.6%. These numbers show that each processor sits comfortably within its own performance tier, with the EPYC 7252 occupying a slightly higher rung.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P has 12 cores, while the AMD EPYC 7252 has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Does the AMD EPYC 7252 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the EPYC 7252 has ECC memory support. The Intel Core i5-1340P does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance?

A: The AMD EPYC 7252 wins every single-core Cinebench test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2329 versus 2218 for the i5-1340P, a 4.8% lead.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the AMD EPYC 7252 has a boost clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: What memory channels does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P supports dual-channel memory, while the AMD EPYC 7252 supports eight-channel memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD EPYC 7252 has 32 MB per die with a total of 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-1340P has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-1340P is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P variant, using a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. It has 12 cores and 16 threads, which indicates a hybrid configuration typical of Intel's recent mobile parts, though the database does not break down performance versus efficiency cores. The cache hierarchy is segmented: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It includes integrated graphics in the form of Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, making it a self-contained solution for systems without a discrete GPU.

The AMD EPYC 7252 is a server processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Rome, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It uses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a simpler core layout. Its cache is different in structure: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3 per die, totaling 64 MB across the chip. The EPYC 7252 has 7,600 million transistors across a die size of 2x 74 mm². It supports DDR4 memory in an eight-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is critical for server workloads. There is no integrated graphics on this chip.

The process node difference is significant: 10 nm for Intel versus 7 nm for AMD, with the latter using TSMC as the foundry. The EPYC 7252 also carries a much larger transistor count and a bigger total cache. The PCIe capabilities differ starkly: the i5-1340P offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the EPYC 7252 offers Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU. This makes the EPYC 7252 suited for systems with many expansion cards, storage devices, or network controllers, whereas the i5-1340P is limited to a mobile platform's needs.

Specification Differences

The specifications diverge sharply in several key areas. The Intel Core i5-1340P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD EPYC 7252 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: the i5-1340P runs at 1900 MHz, and the EPYC 7252 runs at 3100 MHz. Boost clocks also differ: the i5-1340P reaches 4.60 GHz, while the EPYC 7252 tops out at 3.20 GHz. The TDP is a major differentiator: the i5-1340P is rated at 28 watts, while the EPYC 7252 is rated at 120 watts. This means the Intel part is designed for power-constrained mobile environments, while the AMD part is built for server sockets where power is less of a concern.

The sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 1744 for the i5-1340P versus AMD Socket SP3 for the EPYC 7252. Memory support differs in type and channel count: the i5-1340P supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while the EPYC 7252 supports only DDR4 in eight-channel mode. The EPYC 7252 has a specified memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, while the i5-1340P has no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported on the EPYC 7252 but not on the i5-1340P. The i5-1340P includes integrated graphics, while the EPYC 7252 has none. The market segments are also distinct: mobile for Intel, server/workstation for AMD.

The release dates reflect the generational gap: the i5-1340P launched on January 3, 2023, while the EPYC 7252 launched on August 6, 2019. The launch MSRP for the i5-1340P is $353, and for the EPYC 7252 it is $475. Both processors are still listed as active in production. The process node differences are notable: 10 nm for Intel versus 7 nm for AMD. The transistor count and die size are only recorded for the EPYC 7252, which has 7,600 million transistors across 2x 74 mm² dies.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear winner in raw benchmark performance: the AMD EPYC 7252 wins all six Cinebench tests, with margins between 4.7% and 4.8%. Its average benchmark score of 4772 is higher than the i5-1340P's 4545, and it sits at the 59th percentile versus the 58th percentile for the Intel part. If the only criterion is measured performance in Cinebench, the EPYC 7252 is the better choice.

However, the context matters. The i5-1340P achieves this near-parity while consuming 28 watts versus 120 watts for the EPYC 7252. It also includes integrated graphics, supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and comes in a mobile socket. The EPYC 7252 offers ECC memory, eight-channel memory support, 128 PCIe lanes, and a massive 64 MB L3 cache, but it requires a server platform. The i5-1340P is designed for laptops and compact systems, while the EPYC 7252 is designed for data centers.

For a user building a portable workstation or a power-efficient mini PC, the i5-1340P makes sense despite losing every benchmark. For a server workload that needs ECC memory, high memory bandwidth, or extensive PCIe expansion, the EPYC 7252 is the obvious pick. The benchmark scores alone do not tell the full story, but they do show that the EPYC 7252 is faster in these specific tests.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 7252 wins in every recorded benchmark, so it is the stronger performer in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multicore. It also wins in theoretical memory bandwidth due to its eight-channel configuration and 85.3 GB/s specification. The EPYC 7252 is the better choice for server environments where ECC memory is required, where many PCIe devices need to be connected, or where the 64 MB L3 cache can accelerate large data sets.

The Intel Core i5-1340P wins in power efficiency, with a 28 watt TDP compared to 120 watts for the EPYC 7252. It also wins in portability, as it is designed for a mobile socket and includes integrated graphics. The i5-1340P supports DDR5 memory, which the EPYC 7252 does not, and it has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 3.20 GHz. For single-threaded bursts, the higher boost clock could give the i5-1340P an edge in short tasks that are not captured by the Cinebench results, though the recorded data shows the EPYC 7252 ahead in single-core tests.

In practical terms, the i5-1340P is the right choice for a laptop that needs to run demanding applications without draining a battery, or for a small form factor system with no discrete GPU. The EPYC 7252 is the right choice for a rack server that prioritizes throughput, memory capacity, and reliability. The benchmark results indicate that the EPYC 7252 is the faster processor, but the i5-1340P offers a compelling mix of features for its intended market segment.