AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE Comparison

# AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE vs AMD EPYC 7252: A Benchmark Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE and AMD EPYC 7252 are both 8-core, 16-thread Zen 2 processors, yet they target entirely different market segments. The 4700GE is a desktop APU with integrated graphics and a 35W TDP, while the EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation chip with a 120W TDP, eight-channel memory, and ECC support. Benchmark data shows the 4700GE wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, but by margins so slim that the EPYC’s platform advantages may matter more for its intended use cases.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 4700GE wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 1685 against the EPYC’s 1662, a 1.4% advantage. The single-core R15 result is 237 versus 234, a 1.3% edge. These margins repeat across R20 and R23: multicore deltas stay at 1.4% (7023 vs 6929 in R20; 16722 vs 16499 in R23), while single-core deltas hold at 1.3% (991 vs 978 in R20; 2360 vs 2329 in R23). The pattern is consistent—the 4700GE is slightly faster in every workload measured, but never by more than 1.4%.

The EPYC 7252’s wins are not in raw Cinebench scores but in platform capabilities. It supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, versus dual-channel 51.2 GB/s on the 4700GE. It also brings ECC memory support, 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and a socket designed for multi-socket server configurations. The 4700GE counters with integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, a feature the EPYC lacks entirely. For workloads that stress memory bandwidth or require ECC reliability, the EPYC is the clear choice despite losing every compute benchmark.

Architecture Differences

Both chips are built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with Zen 2 architecture, but their implementations diverge significantly. The 4700GE uses the Renoir die, measuring 156 mm² with 9,800 million transistors. The EPYC 7252 uses the Rome design, which employs two 74 mm² chiplets totaling 7,600 million transistors. This chiplet approach allows the EPYC to scale across its 7002 series, while Renoir is a monolithic APU design.

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both have 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but the 4700GE has 8 MB total L3 cache, while the EPYC 7252 offers 32 MB per die, totaling 64 MB. That 8x difference in L3 capacity can matter for workloads with large working sets, even if Cinebench doesn’t show it. Clock speeds also favor the desktop chip: the 4700GE boosts to 4.30 GHz from a 3.10 GHz base, while the EPYC tops out at 3.20 GHz boost from the same 3.10 GHz base. The 4700GE’s higher boost clock explains its consistent single-core lead.

Memory infrastructure is a major separator. The EPYC supports eight-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s peak bandwidth and ECC, while the 4700GE is dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s and no ECC. PCIe generation also differs: the EPYC provides Gen 4 with 128 lanes (CPU only), versus Gen 3 on the 4700GE. The EPYC’s TDP of 120W is more than triple the 4700GE’s 35W, reflecting its server-oriented power delivery and memory controllers. The 4700GE includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, making it a complete APU, while the EPYC has no iGPU.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Ryzen 7 4700GE outperforms the EPYC 7252 in every Cinebench test, with a 1.3-1.4% margin across the board. Its higher boost clock and monolithic design give it a small but consistent edge in both single-core and multi-core rendering workloads. For users running Cinebench-type applications, the 4700GE is the faster processor.

However, the EPYC 7252’s value lies outside these benchmarks. Eight-channel memory with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, ECC support, and 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it a platform for servers and workstations that need memory capacity, data integrity, and I/O expansion. The 4700GE’s dual-channel 51.2 GB/s and Gen 3 PCIe cannot match that infrastructure. The EPYC’s 120W TDP and Socket SP3 also indicate a platform designed for sustained, multi-socket operation. The 4700GE’s 35W TDP and AM4 socket target compact desktops and all-in-one systems.

The verdict depends on the workload. For pure compute density per benchmark point, the 4700GE wins—its average benchmark score of 4836 exceeds the EPYC’s 4772, and both sit at the 59th percentile among all CPUs. But for memory-bound enterprise tasks, ECC requirements, or high-lane-count PCIe Gen 4 systems, the EPYC’s platform advantages outweigh its slight compute deficit. The 4700GE is the better desktop part; the EPYC is the better server foundation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE boosts to 4.30 GHz, while the AMD EPYC 7252 boosts to 3.20 GHz. Both share a 3.10 GHz base clock.

Q: Does the EPYC 7252 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the EPYC 7252 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE does not. The EPYC also uses eight-channel DDR4 with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, versus dual-channel 51.2 GB/s on the 4700GE.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Ryzen 7 4700GE has 8 MB total L3 cache. The EPYC 7252 has 32 MB per die, totaling 64 MB, which is 8x more than the 4700GE.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 7 4700GE includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The EPYC 7252 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for both chips?

A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the 4700GE scores 16722 and the EPYC 7252 scores 16499, a 1.4% difference. In single-core, the 4700GE scores 2360 and the EPYC scores 2329, a 1.3% difference.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The EPYC 7252 provides 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses PCIe Gen 3 without a specified lane count in the data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

All six head-to-head Cinebench results favor the Ryzen 7 4700GE, but the margins are remarkably consistent and small. Starting with Cinebench R15 multicore, the 4700GE scores 1685 versus the EPYC’s 1662, a 1.4% delta. The single-core R15 test shows 237 against 234, a 1.3% lead. These early results establish a pattern that holds throughout the benchmark suite.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore scores are 7023 for the 4700GE and 6929 for the EPYC, again a 1.4% gap. Single-core R20 delivers 991 versus 978, maintaining the 1.3% delta. The consistency suggests the 4700GE’s advantage stems from its higher boost clock rather than any architectural superiority—both chips share Zen 2 and 7 nm process, but the 4700GE’s 4.30 GHz boost outpaces the EPYC’s 3.20 GHz.

The largest absolute differences appear in Cinebench R23. Multicore scores reach 16722 for the 4700GE and 16499 for the EPYC, a 223-point gap that translates to 1.4%. Single-core R23 shows 2360 versus 2329, a 31-point gap at 1.3%. These are the highest raw scores in the comparison, but the relative margins remain unchanged.

The biggest win for the 4700GE is in the R23 multicore test, where it leads by 223 points. The smallest absolute margin is in R15 single-core, just 3 points. Across all tests, the 4700GE never exceeds a 1.4% advantage, making it a clear but narrow winner. The EPYC’s nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon W-1290E (avg score 4775, delta -0.1%) and Intel Core i5-1350P (4776, -0.1%), suggesting the EPYC sits in a competitive cluster. The 4700GE’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS (4827, +0.2%) and Ryzen 9 3950X (4807, +0.6%), showing it slightly outperforms its peers. With winsA at 6 and winsB at 0, the benchmark data leaves no ambiguity about compute performance—the 4700GE is faster, but the EPYC’s platform features define its role.