AMD EPYC 7203P vs Intel Core i5-13500HX Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 7203P

CORE STATE Milan
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.8 Base / 3.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 120W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-13500HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,886
2,863
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
266
252
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,859
9,792
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,109
1,382
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,714
18,334
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,642
1,730.5
passmark_data_compression
254,215
331,896
passmark_data_encryption
17,434
19,267
passmark_extended_instructions
14,466
20,200
passmark_find_prime_numbers
145
98
passmark_floating_point_math
37,049
70,885
passmark_integer_math
67,083
96,195
passmark_multithread
22,017
27,753
passmark_physics
2,077
1,634
passmark_random_string_sorting
33,873
36,373
passmark_single_thread
2,537
3,582
passmark_singlethread
2,537
3,582
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
7,307
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,899
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,607
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
5,712
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
7,885
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
972

Analysis: AMD EPYC 7203P vs Intel Core i5-13500HX

The Intel Core i5-13500HX and AMD EPYC 7203P occupy different market segments: the former is a mobile processor, the latter a server/workstation part. The benchmark data shows a clear overall leader: the Intel chip wins 12 of 17 head-to-head tests and posts a higher average benchmark score (29,270 vs 28,583). However, the AMD EPYC takes five tests, including some single-core and physics workloads. This analysis walks through the recorded measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin in the entire comparison belongs to Intel in floating point math. The Core i5-13500HX scores 70,885 against the EPYC's 37,049, a 91.3% advantage. That is the single biggest delta in the dataset. Intel also dominates Cinebench R15 multi-core, scoring 2,863 versus 1,886, a 51.8% lead. Integer math follows a similar pattern: 96,195 vs 67,083, a 43.4% gap. In single-thread PassMark, Intel leads 3,582 to 2,537, a 41.2% difference. Extended instructions show a 39.6% edge (20,200 vs 14,466), and data compression is 30.6% ahead (331,896 vs 254,215). The multithread PassMark score favors Intel by 26.1% (27,753 vs 22,017). Cinebench R20 multi-core and single-core both give Intel a 24.6% lead (9,792 vs 7,859 and 1,382 vs 1,109). Data encryption is 10.5% higher (19,267 vs 17,434), and random string sorting is 7.4% ahead (36,373 vs 33,873).

The AMD EPYC 7203P wins five tests, but the margins are smaller. Its biggest win is Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 2,642 against Intel's 1,730.5, a 34.5% advantage. In PassMark find prime numbers, AMD leads 145 to 98, a 32.4% gap. Physics shows AMD ahead by 21.3% (2,077 vs 1,634). Cinebench R15 single-core is close: AMD 266 vs Intel 252, a 5.3% edge. Finally, Cinebench R23 multi-core goes to AMD by a slim 2% (18,714 vs 18,334). These wins are concentrated in single-core and specialized workloads, while Intel's victories span a broader range of compute tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is the clear winner in math-heavy and data-processing workloads. Floating point math, integer math, extended instructions, data compression, and data encryption all fall to Intel by double-digit margins. The multithread PassMark score and Cinebench R20 (both multi and single core) also favor Intel. This makes the Core i5 the stronger choice for general productivity, scientific computing, and any task that relies on parallel integer or floating point operations.

The AMD EPYC 7203P takes the lead in a few specific areas. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is substantially higher, and it also wins the R15 single-core test, though by a much smaller margin. The find prime numbers test, which measures a specific integer workload, goes to AMD by 32.4%. Physics simulation also favors AMD, with a 21.3% advantage. The R23 multi-core result is nearly a tie, with AMD edging ahead by 2%. These wins suggest AMD's Zen 3 architecture delivers strong single-thread performance in certain benchmarks, but the overall pattern is that Intel dominates the majority of recorded tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD EPYC 7203P has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which has a higher boost clock?

A: Intel boosts to 4.70 GHz, while AMD boosts to 3.40 GHz. Intel's base clock is 2.50 GHz, AMD's is 2.80 GHz.

Q: Which has more L3 cache?

A: AMD has 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which supports more memory channels?

A: AMD has an eight-channel memory bus, while Intel has a dual-channel bus. AMD also lists a memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: Intel includes UHD Graphics 710. AMD has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which has a higher average benchmark score?

A: Intel's average benchmark score is 29,270, compared to AMD's 28,583. Intel also sits at the 81st percentile versus AMD's 80th.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-13500HX | AMD EPYC 7203P |

|---------------|----------------------|----------------|

| Cores | 14 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.70 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 120 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1964 | AMD Socket SP3 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3 (Milan) |

| Process node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die size | 257 mm² | 2x 81 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Eight-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | Not listed | 204.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 128 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 710 | None |

| Market segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release date | 2023-01-03 | 2023-09-04 |

| Launch MSRP | $326 | $348 |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part number | SRME7 | 100-000001287100-100001287WOF |

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design points. Intel uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process, fabricated by Intel itself. AMD uses Zen 3 (Milan) on a 7 nm process from TSMC. The core counts differ sharply: Intel packs 14 cores, AMD only 8. Intel's per-core L2 cache is larger at 2 MB versus 512 KB, but AMD's shared L3 cache is much bigger at 64 MB versus 24 MB. Memory architecture also diverges: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, while AMD supports only DDR4 but over an eight-channel bus with a listed bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity favors AMD with 128 Gen 4 lanes, while Intel offers 20 Gen 5 lanes. Intel includes an integrated GPU, AMD does not. Intel's multiplier is unlocked, AMD's is locked. The market segments are also distinct: Intel is a mobile part, AMD is a server/workstation part.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to the Intel Core i5-13500HX as the stronger performer in the majority of recorded tests. It wins 12 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, holds a higher average score (29,270 vs 28,583), and sits at a higher percentile (81 vs 80). For mobile workloads, general computing, and tasks that stress floating point, integer, compression, or encryption, Intel is the clear choice. The AMD EPYC 7203P, however, wins in Cinebench R23 single-core, find prime numbers, physics, and R15 single-core. It also offers a much larger L3 cache, eight-channel memory, and 128 PCIe lanes, which are not reflected in the benchmark scores but matter for server and workstation deployments. Users who need those platform features should consider the EPYC, but based purely on the recorded benchmark results, the Intel Core i5-13500HX leads in most categories.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 7203P
i5-13500HX
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.8
2.5 -10.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.4
4.7 +38.2%
Frequency (GHz)
2.8
2.5 -10.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.4
4.7 +38.2%
Multiplier
28
25 -10.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
120
55 -54.2%
PL1
—
55 W
PL2
—
157 W
Configurable TDP
120-150 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Raptor Lake
Codename
Milan
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,300 million
—
Die Size
2x 81 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
—
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
1800 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
CCDs
2
—
Cores per CCD
4
—
IO Process Size
12 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
—
UHD Graphics 710
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$348
$326
Part Number
100-000001287100-100001287WOF
SRME7
Package
FCLGA-4094
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
—
100°C
View EPYC 7203P Details View Core i5-13500HX Details