AMD EPYC 4364P vs Intel Core i7-13700K Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700K and the AMD EPYC 4364P occupy different market segments but land at nearly identical average benchmark scores. The data shows the Intel part holds a 0.3% lead in average benchmark score, with a 47282 average against the EPYC’s 47131. Both processors sit in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, making them statistically equivalent in overall performance. The verdict from the data is clear: the i7-13700K wins every single head-to-head benchmark recorded, taking 17 wins out of 17 contests. The EPYC 4364P, however, is not a failure; it is a lower-core-count, higher-clocked server chip that trades raw throughput for efficiency and platform features. The i7-13700K is the choice for anyone prioritizing maximum compute performance in desktop workloads, while the EPYC 4364P is the pick for server or workstation builds where the AM5 platform, lower TDP, and server-grade positioning matter more than winning every benchmark.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-13700K outperforms the AMD EPYC 4364P in every recorded test. The Intel chip leads by 31.8% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 39000 against 29589, and by 31.8% in single-core as well, with 5505 versus 4177. The pattern holds across all 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with deltas ranging from a modest 3.8% in PassMark find prime numbers to a massive 66.6% in floating point math. For users who need the fastest possible rendering, encoding, or general compute, the i7-13700K is the only choice between these two. However, the EPYC 4364P is not without merit. It is a server/workstation part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 105W TDP, and a 5nm process node from TSMC. The i7-13700K draws 125W, has 16 cores and 24 threads, and uses Intel’s 10nm node. The EPYC also offers more PCIe lanes (28 versus 20) and a higher base clock (4.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz), though both boost to 5.40 GHz. The data suggests the i7-13700K is for raw performance; the EPYC 4364P is for those who need a lower-power, server-oriented chip on the AM5 platform with integrated Radeon Graphics and 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Neither chip wins on price in this analysis, but the launch MSRP is $409 for the Intel and $399 for the AMD.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial, reflecting their different design goals. The Intel Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 16 cores and 24 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid design. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD EPYC 4364P, in contrast, uses Zen 4 architecture on a 5nm process node from TSMC, with a much smaller die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the EPYC supports only DDR5. Both are dual-channel, but the EPYC lists a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a figure the Intel data does not provide. The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, while the EPYC has Radeon Graphics. Both support ECC memory, a notable feature for workstation reliability. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the EPYC is locked. The i7-13700K launched on 2022-09-26, while the EPYC 4364P launched on 2024-05-20, making the AMD part nearly two years newer. The sockets differ entirely: Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket AM5. The EPYC offers Gen 5 PCIe with 28 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). These architectural differences explain the performance gap: the Intel chip has twice the cores and threads, which drives its multi-threaded dominance, while the EPYC compensates with a smaller, more efficient process node and higher base clock.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD EPYC 4364P has 8 cores and 16 threads. This gives the Intel part a 2x core advantage and a 1.5x thread advantage.

Q: How much faster is the Intel chip in multi-core workloads?

A: The i7-13700K leads by 31.8% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 39000 versus 29589. The same 31.8% delta appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core (16380 vs 12427) and PassMark multithread (45887 vs 34811).

Q: Does the AMD EPYC 4364P win any benchmarks?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-13700K wins all 17 recorded tests. The EPYC 4364P has zero wins, with its closest margin being a 3.8% deficit in PassMark find prime numbers (191 vs 184).

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a TDP of 125W, while the AMD EPYC 4364P has a TDP of 105W. The EPYC is the lower-power part, despite having a higher base clock of 4.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD EPYC 4364P supports Gen 5 PCIe with 28 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core i7-13700K supports Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The EPYC offers 8 more lanes.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-13700K and the AMD EPYC 4364P are in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores are 47282 and 47131, respectively, a difference of only 0.3%.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-13700K has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD EPYC 4364P has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock favors the AMD chip at 4.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz, but the boost clock is identical at 5.40 GHz. TDP differs by 20W, with Intel at 125W and AMD at 105W. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket AM5. The architecture is Raptor Lake for Intel and Zen 4 for AMD, with process nodes of 10nm (Intel) and 5nm (TSMC). The die size is 257 mm² for Intel and 71 mm² for AMD, with the AMD part listing 6,570 million transistors. Cache configurations differ: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3; AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is broader on Intel (DDR4 and DDR5) versus AMD (DDR5 only), though both are dual-channel; AMD lists 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. PCIe lanes favor AMD at 28 Gen 5 lanes versus Intel’s 20 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 770 on Intel, Radeon Graphics on AMD. The market segment is Desktop for Intel and Server/Workstation for AMD. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part is locked. Release dates are 2022-09-26 for Intel and 2024-05-20 for AMD. The launch MSRP is $409 for Intel and $399 for AMD. Part numbers are SRMB8 for Intel and 100-000001477 for AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a consistent and often large advantage for the Intel Core i7-13700K. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 39000 against 29589, a 31.8% lead. The same delta appears in Cinebench R23 single-core (5505 vs 4177) and across the entire Cinebench R15 and R20 suites, all showing exactly 31.8% differences. The PassMark suite reveals even larger gaps in some tests. Floating point math shows the biggest disparity, with Intel at 114867 versus AMD at 68959, a 66.6% advantage. Physics follows with a 46.5% lead (2716 vs 1854). Data compression is 42.1% faster on Intel (595292 vs 418816). Integer math shows a 38.8% lead (154446 vs 111292). Data encryption is 33.7% faster (33249 vs 24870). PassMark multithread shows 45887 versus 34811, a 31.8% delta. Random string sorting is 27% faster (62670 vs 49344). Single-thread performance is 18.4% better (4333 vs 3661). Extended instructions show a 13% lead (36625 vs 32425). The smallest margin is in find prime numbers, where Intel leads 191 to 184, a 3.8% difference. These results indicate the i7-13700K wins not just in raw multi-threaded throughput but also in single-threaded and specialized instruction workloads. The EPYC’s higher base clock does not translate into any benchmark victory, as the Intel part’s superior boost behavior and core count dominate across the board.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on benchmark wins, the Intel Core i7-13700K wins everywhere. It takes all 17 head-to-head tests, with the largest margins in floating point math (66.6%), physics (46.5%), and data compression (42.1%). These results point to use cases like scientific computing, simulation, and compression-heavy workloads, where the Intel chip’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide a decisive advantage. The Intel part also wins in every Cinebench test, making it the stronger choice for rendering and 3D animation tasks. Its single-thread lead of 18.4% in PassMark single-thread suggests better responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications as well. The AMD EPYC 4364P, despite losing every benchmark, has its own strengths that are not captured in the head-to-head data. It has a lower TDP of 105W, a more advanced 5nm process node, more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20), and a higher base clock of 4.50 GHz. These features make it suitable for server or workstation environments where power efficiency, I/O expansion, and platform longevity on AM5 matter more than raw compute speed. The EPYC also has a smaller die size (71 mm² vs 257 mm²) and lists 6,570 million transistors, indicating a denser, more efficient design. For single-socket servers that need ECC memory support and integrated Radeon Graphics, the EPYC 4364P is the logical pick. For desktop users who want maximum performance in every benchmark category, the i7-13700K is the definitive winner, with a 0.3% higher average benchmark score and a 100% win rate in direct comparisons.