AMD EPYC 4245P vs Intel Core i7-13700F Comparison

The benchmark data presents a clear split: the Intel Core i7-13700F dominates raw throughput and multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD EPYC 4245P counters with superior single-thread performance in specific tests and a decisive win in prime number computation. With 13 wins in the head-to-head comparisons, the Intel part is the overall performance leader, but the EPYC’s 4 wins highlight distinct architectural strengths that matter for particular workloads. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 39215 for the EPYC versus 39009 for the Intel — a delta of just 0.5%, placing both at the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-13700F delivers a comprehensive sweep across the Cinebench suite, winning all six tests by a consistent margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel scores 32101 against the EPYC’s 26618, a 17.1% advantage. The same 17.1% delta appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core (3235 vs 2682), Cinebench R20 multi-core (13482 vs 11179), and every single-core Cinebench variant — R15 (456 vs 378), R20 (1903 vs 1577), and R23 (4532 vs 3757). This uniformity suggests a fundamental throughput advantage driven by the Intel’s larger core count, not a workload-specific quirk.

The gap widens further in PassMark’s math-oriented tests. Floating point math shows the Intel at 100422 versus 57965 for the EPYC — a massive 42.3% lead. Integer math follows at 141370 versus 95120, a 32.7% delta. Data encryption favors Intel by 31.5% (26956 vs 18466), and data compression by 28.1% (471838 vs 339408). Even random string sorting, a memory-latency-sensitive test, goes Intel’s way by 20.1% (49974 vs 39916). The PassMark multi-thread score reflects this pattern: 38369 for Intel versus 31063 for the EPYC, a 19% margin.

The AMD EPYC 4245P wins are narrower but significant. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4575 beats Intel’s 4121 by 11%, a notable reversal given Intel’s single-core Cinebench victories. The EPYC also wins PassMark physics (2637 vs 2236, a 17.9% delta) and finds prime numbers at 193 versus 156, a 23.7% advantage. These wins suggest the Zen 5 architecture extracts higher efficiency from individual threads in specific instruction patterns, even when aggregate multi-core performance falls short.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher PassMark single-thread score?

A: The AMD EPYC 4245P, scoring 4575 compared to the Intel Core i7-13700F’s 4121, an 11% advantage.

Q: How much slower is the EPYC in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The EPYC scores 26618 versus Intel’s 32101, a 17.1% deficit across all Cinebench versions.

Q: Does the EPYC win any PassMark tests?

A: Yes, it wins PassMark physics (2637 vs 2236), find prime numbers (193 vs 156), and single-thread (4575 vs 4121).

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The EPYC averages 39215, and the Intel averages 39009, a delta of 0.5% favoring the EPYC.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD EPYC 4245P has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the Intel part perform in floating point math?

A: It scores 100422 versus the EPYC’s 57965, a 42.3% lead, the largest margin in any benchmark.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in design philosophy. The AMD EPYC 4245P uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 70.6 mm² and 8,315 million transistors. The Intel Core i7-13700F uses Raptor Lake on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a much larger 257 mm² die. Core counts differ sharply: 6 cores and 12 threads for the EPYC versus 16 cores and 24 threads for Intel. Both share 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the EPYC has 1 MB L2 per core and 32 MB shared L3, while Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 30 MB shared L3.

Memory support splits the pair. The EPYC supports only DDR5 with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but has no listed memory bandwidth figure and no ECC support. PCIe lanes differ: 24 Gen 5 lanes for the EPYC versus 16 Gen 5 lanes for Intel. The EPYC includes integrated Radeon Graphics; the Intel has no integrated graphics. The EPYC targets the server/workstation segment on AMD Socket AM5, while Intel targets desktop on Socket 1700. Clock speeds favor the EPYC on paper — base 3.90 GHz and boost 5.40 GHz versus Intel’s 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost — but the benchmark results show the Intel’s core count overcomes the clock deficit.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for most users: the Intel Core i7-13700F is the superior multi-threaded processor. Its 17.1% lead across all Cinebench tests, 42.3% lead in floating point math, and 31.5% lead in encryption make it the default for rendering, scientific computing, and data-heavy workloads. The 19% PassMark multi-thread advantage reinforces this. For users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness, the AMD EPYC 4245P holds an 11% edge in PassMark single-thread and wins physics and prime number tests, making it competitive for lightly threaded tasks.

However, the EPYC’s server credentials matter. ECC memory support, integrated Radeon Graphics, and a higher memory bandwidth figure (89.6 GB/s) position it for workstation reliability. The Intel part’s lack of ECC and integrated graphics limits its appeal in those contexts. The 86th percentile ranking for both CPUs confirms they are closely matched in overall CPU population, but the benchmark distribution is lopsided. Choose Intel for maximum throughput across most workloads; choose AMD for single-thread-specific tasks, ECC requirements, or a smaller physical footprint with the 70.6 mm² die versus 257 mm².

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD EPYC 4245P | Intel Core i7-13700F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.90 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 70.6 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | None |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-05-12 | 2023-01-03 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700F wins every Cinebench test, all PassMark math and encryption tests, and PassMark multithread, data compression, and random string sorting. This makes it the clear pick for rendering, video encoding, data compression pipelines, and any workload that scales with core count. Its 16 cores and 24 threads deliver a 42.3% advantage in floating point math, which is decisive for scientific simulations and financial modeling.

The AMD EPYC 4245P wins PassMark single-thread, physics, and find prime numbers. The 23.7% lead in prime number finding indicates strong integer performance per core, and the 17.9% physics win suggests better handling of simulation logic. The 11% single-thread advantage matters for legacy applications that rely on one core. Its ECC memory support and server segment classification make it the safer choice for data integrity in workstation environments, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provides display output without a discrete GPU. The EPYC also has more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) and a higher memory bandwidth figure, which benefits storage and network-heavy server tasks.