AMD EPYC 4244P vs Intel Core i5-13450HX Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13450HX and AMD EPYC 4244P occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their average benchmark scores are remarkably close. The Intel mobile part posts an average score of 34333, while the AMD server/workstation chip trails by a hair at 34220, a difference of just 0.3%. Both sit at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, and their nearest rival lists overlap heavily, including each other and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. Despite this overall parity, the head-to-head data reveals a clear split: the EPYC wins 13 of 17 direct comparisons, while the i5 takes 4, with margins ranging from negligible to massive.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for either side comes in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the EPYC 4244P scores 3259 against the i5-13450HX’s 1746, a 46.4% advantage. This is not a small gap; it reflects a fundamental difference in per-thread capability that shows up in every single-threaded test. The EPYC also leads Cinebench R15 single-core by 24.4% (328 vs 248) and R20 single-core by 9.9% (1368 vs 1232). The pattern is consistent: AMD’s Zen 4 cores are substantially faster per thread than Intel’s Raptor Lake mobile cores.

Multi-core results are more mixed, but the EPYC still holds the edge in most cases. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 23089 versus 16797 for Intel, a 27.3% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core goes to the EPYC by 10% (9697 vs 8728), and PassMark multithread favors AMD by 6.4% (26797 vs 25084). However, the Intel part wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with 2503 against 2327, a 7.6% margin. This is the only Cinebench multi-core test the i5 wins, and it is the oldest version of the benchmark in the data.

The PassMark suite splits along workload type. Intel wins floating point math by a wide 35.6% margin (61776 vs 45546), and integer math by 5.7% (83209 vs 78709). Data compression goes to Intel by a slim 1.1% (305990 vs 302606). AMD counters with wins in data encryption (18232 vs 16632, an 8.8% edge), extended instructions (22149 vs 19083, 13.8%), find prime numbers (187 vs 83, a 55.6% blowout), physics (1981 vs 1504, 24.1%), and random string sorting (38048 vs 31940, 16.1%). Single-thread PassMark also goes to AMD, 3710 vs 3553, a 4.2% difference.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13450HX has an average benchmark score of 34333, while the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220. The difference is 0.3% in favor of Intel, and both CPUs sit at the 84th percentile of all processors.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 3259 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 46.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-13450HX’s 1746. This is the largest single-core margin in the entire head-to-head dataset.

Q: Does the Intel chip win any multi-core benchmarks?

A: Yes. The Intel Core i5-13450HX wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with a score of 2503, beating the EPYC’s 2327 by 7.6%. It also wins PassMark floating point math (61776 vs 45546) and integer math (83209 vs 78709), though those are not strictly multi-core tests.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The closest result is PassMark data compression, where Intel scores 305990 and AMD scores 302606, a 1.1% difference. The average benchmark scores are also extremely close, at 34333 vs 34220.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD EPYC 4244P has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the EPYC wins most multi-threaded benchmarks.

Q: How do the two compare in PassMark find prime numbers?

A: The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 187, which is 55.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13450HX’s 83. This is the largest percentage margin in any PassMark test.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from fundamentally different designs. The Intel Core i5-13450HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. It has a die size of 257 mm². The AMD EPYC 4244P uses Zen 4, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of just 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. The process node difference is significant: 10 nm vs 5 nm, which helps explain the EPYC’s higher clock speeds and efficiency.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 20 MB of shared L3. AMD gives each core 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, but shares 32 MB of L3. The EPYC’s larger L3 pool is likely a contributor to its strong performance in single-threaded and latency-sensitive workloads.

Memory support diverges as well. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The EPYC lists a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the i5 has no bandwidth figure in the data. Both support ECC memory. PCIe lanes also differ: Intel offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while AMD offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only). The socket types are entirely different: Intel BGA 1964 for the mobile chip, AMD Socket AM5 for the server part.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious split. Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads; AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads. Clock speeds favor AMD substantially: the EPYC has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost of 5.10 GHz, while the i5 runs at 2.40 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. The EPYC also has a higher TDP at 65 watts versus Intel’s 55 watts.

The process node and foundry differ: Intel uses 10 nm at its own foundry, while AMD uses 5 nm at TSMC. Die size and transistor counts also favor AMD’s density, with 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors versus Intel’s 257 mm² with no transistor count listed. Cache configurations differ in every level. Memory support is broader on Intel (DDR4 and DDR5) but narrower on AMD (DDR5 only), though AMD lists a specific memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. PCIe lanes favor AMD at 28 versus Intel’s 20, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ as well: Intel has UHD Graphics 710, while AMD has Radeon Graphics. The market segments are different: Intel is aimed at mobile, AMD at server/workstation. Release dates are far apart: Intel launched on 2023-01-03, AMD on 2024-05-20. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part does not. Launch MSRP for Intel is $326; for AMD it is $229.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 4244P is the clear winner in single-threaded performance. Every single-core benchmark in the dataset goes to AMD, with margins from 4.2% in PassMark single-thread to 46.4% in Cinebench R23. It also dominates most multi-threaded rendering workloads, including Cinebench R20 and R23 multi-core. For server and workstation tasks like encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, physics simulation, and random string sorting, the EPYC is ahead by double digits in most cases.

The Intel Core i5-13450HX wins in specific computational domains. Floating point math is its strongest category, where it beats AMD by 35.6%. Integer math also goes to Intel by 5.7%. Data compression is nearly a tie but favors Intel by 1.1%. In the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test, Intel holds a 7.6% edge. These wins suggest Intel’s architecture is better suited to certain math-heavy workloads, even if it falls behind in broader multi-threaded tests.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the AMD EPYC 4244P is the more capable processor in most benchmarks, despite having 4 fewer cores and 4 fewer threads than the Intel Core i5-13450HX. AMD wins 13 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, including all single-threaded tests and the most demanding multi-core Cinebench runs. Its 27.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 46.4% lead in single-core are decisive. The Intel chip is not without merit—floating point math, integer math, and data compression all favor Intel—but those wins are narrower or more specialized.

For buyers who prioritize raw single-thread speed, rendering performance, or server-specific workloads like encryption and physics, the EPYC 4244P is the clear choice based on the benchmark data. For those who need a mobile processor with strong floating point and integer math performance, the i5-13450HX holds its own in those specific areas. The EPYC also offers more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) and a larger L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB), while the i5 counters with broader memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) and an unlocked multiplier. The choice depends on workload, but the benchmark results favor AMD in most scenarios.