AMD Athlon X4 830 vs AMD PRO A10-8750B Comparison
AMD Athlon X4 830
PRO A10-8750B
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Athlon X4 830 vs AMD PRO A10-8750B
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark data shows a consistent, if narrow, edge for the AMD PRO A10-8750B across every recorded test. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the PRO A10-8750B scores 254 against 248 for the Athlon X4 830, a 2.4% advantage. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the PRO A10-8750B posts 1060 versus 1035, again a 2.4% gap. These are not dramatic margins, but they are uniform across all five head-to-head comparisons, suggesting a systematic performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.
Single-threaded results tell the same story. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the PRO A10-8750B records 149 against 146 for the Athlon X4 830, a 2% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 356 versus 348, a 2.2% gap. The consistency of these deltas, all between 2% and 2.4%, points to a clock-speed-driven difference rather than any architectural superiority, as both processors share the same core design.
The Athlon X4 830 wins zero head-to-head tests. Its average benchmark score of 848 does sit slightly above the PRO A10-8750B's 821, but that figure includes a broader set of tests for the PRO part, including Geekbench results where it scores 985 multi-core and 416 single-core. When the same Cinebench workloads are compared directly, the PRO A10-8750B is ahead in every instance. The data indicates the Athlon's lower clocks cost it across the board, though the small deltas mean real-world differences would be subtle.
Looking at the nearest rivals places these chips in context. The Athlon X4 830 sits within 0.9% of the Intel Core i5-5250U (856 average) and within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-3520M and AMD FX-8800P (both 843). The PRO A10-8750B lands within 0.8% of the AMD A10 PRO-7850B (828) and 0.6% of the Intel Core i5-L16G7 (816). Both parts occupy a similar performance tier, but the PRO A10-8750B's average score of 821 places it below the Athlon's 848, despite winning every direct comparison. This discrepancy reflects the different benchmark sets included in each average.
Architecture Differences
Both processors are built on the same Steamroller architecture, fabricated on a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The transistor count is identical at 2,411 million, and the die size matches at 245 mm². Both use the AMD Socket FM2+ platform, support dual-channel DDR3 memory with 34.1 GB/s bandwidth, and do not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.
The core configuration is also the same: 4 cores and 4 threads, with 256 KB of L1 cache and 4 MB of L2 cache. Neither processor has L3 cache. The memory controllers and cache hierarchy are effectively unchanged between the two parts.
The headline architectural difference is the integrated graphics. The AMD PRO A10-8750B includes a Radeon R7 iGPU, while the Athlon X4 830 has no integrated graphics at all. This is a fundamental distinction for system builders: the PRO A10-8750B can drive a display without a discrete GPU, while the Athlon X4 830 requires a separate graphics card. The PRO A10-8750B also carries the "PRO" branding, which in AMD's lineup typically indicates business-oriented features, though the recorded data does not specify what those entail beyond the product name.
The codenames differ slightly: the Athlon X4 830 is listed as Kaveri, while the PRO A10-8750B is listed as Godaveri. Both are Steamroller-based 28 nm parts from the same foundry, so this is a packaging and naming distinction rather than a fundamental design change. The Athlon X4 830 belongs to the Athlon (Kaveri) generation, and the PRO A10-8750B belongs to the A10 (Godaveri) generation.
Clock speeds are the other major difference. The Athlon X4 830 runs at a 3.00 GHz base clock with a 3.40 GHz boost. The PRO A10-8750B runs at 3.60 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost, a 600 MHz advantage at base and 600 MHz at boost. This clock advantage explains the consistent 2% to 2.4% benchmark deltas. The PRO A10-8750B also has a higher TDP at 95 watts versus 65 watts for the Athlon, which is the trade-off for the higher clocks and the integrated GPU.
The multiplier situation differs as well. The Athlon X4 830 has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking. The PRO A10-8750B's multiplier is locked, so users cannot adjust it beyond the factory settings. This is a notable divergence for enthusiasts, though the PRO part's higher stock clocks partially compensate.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher clock speed?
A: The AMD PRO A10-8750B runs at 3.60 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost, compared to 3.00 GHz base and 3.40 GHz boost for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?
A: No. The AMD PRO A10-8750B includes a Radeon R7 iGPU, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 has no integrated graphics listed in the data.
Q: Are these processors on the same socket?
A: Yes, both use AMD Socket FM2+ and support dual-channel DDR3 memory with 34.1 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Which chip performs better in Cinebench R23 multi-core?
A: The AMD PRO A10-8750B scores 2525 versus 2465 for the AMD Athlon X4 830, a 2.4% advantage. The PRO part wins all five recorded head-to-head tests.
Q: Can the Athlon X4 830 support ECC memory?
A: No, neither processor supports ECC memory, according to the recorded data.
Q: Which processor has an unlocked multiplier?
A: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD PRO A10-8750B is locked.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key fields. The base clock is 3.00 GHz for the Athlon X4 830 and 3.60 GHz for the PRO A10-8750B. The boost clock is 3.40 GHz versus 4.00 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts for the Athlon and 95 watts for the PRO. The integrated graphics field is null for the Athlon and Radeon R7 for the PRO. The codename differs: Kaveri for the Athlon, Godaveri for the PRO. The generation line reads "Athlon (Kaveri)" for the Athlon and "A10 (Godaveri)" for the PRO. The multiplier is unlocked for the Athlon and locked for the PRO. The part numbers are AD830XYBI44JA for the Athlon and AD875BYBI44JC for the PRO. The PRO A10-8750B has a release date of September 28, 2015, while the Athlon X4 830 has no release date recorded. The PRO A10-8750B also has Geekbench scores in its benchmark set (985 multi-core, 416 single-core), while the Athlon X4 830 does not.
The specifications that remain identical are extensive: both have 4 cores, 4 threads, 256 KB L1 cache, 4 MB L2 cache, no L3 cache, 28 nm process, GlobalFoundries foundry, 2,411 million transistors, 245 mm² die size, DDR3 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 34.1 GB/s memory bandwidth, no ECC support, PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, Desktop market segment, and end-of-life production status.
The Verdict
The data clearly favors the AMD PRO A10-8750B in raw performance. It wins every head-to-head benchmark, with margins ranging from 2% to 2.4%. The higher base and boost clocks, 3.60 GHz and 4.00 GHz versus 3.00 GHz and 3.40 GHz, deliver a consistent edge in both single-core and multi-core workloads. The integrated Radeon R7 graphics also makes it a more complete package for systems without a discrete GPU.
However, the Athlon X4 830 has its own advantages. Its 65 watt TDP is significantly lower than the PRO A10-8750B's 95 watts, which matters for power-constrained builds or systems with modest cooling. The unlocked multiplier opens the door to overclocking, potentially closing the performance gap or even surpassing the locked PRO part in tuned systems. The Athlon's higher average benchmark score of 848 versus 821 is worth noting, though it reflects different benchmark sets rather than direct comparisons.
For a buyer who values out-of-the-box performance and integrated graphics, the PRO A10-8750B is the data-backed choice. For a buyer who prioritizes power efficiency, overclocking flexibility, and is already planning a discrete GPU, the Athlon X4 830 presents a compelling alternative. The PRO part's 2% to 2.4% lead in head-to-head tests is real but modest, and the Athlon's overclocking headroom could erase that advantage in practice.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD PRO A10-8750B wins in every recorded benchmark comparison. It leads in Cinebench R15 multi-core (254 vs 248), Cinebench R20 multi-core (1060 vs 1035), Cinebench R20 single-core (149 vs 146), Cinebench R23 multi-core (2525 vs 2465), and Cinebench R23 single-core (356 vs 348). Its integrated Radeon R7 graphics gives it a functional advantage for systems without a discrete GPU, and its higher clocks make it the better choice for stock-performance scenarios.
The AMD Athlon X4 830 wins on power efficiency with its 65 watt TDP versus 95 watts, and on overclocking flexibility with its unlocked multiplier. Its lack of integrated graphics means it requires a discrete GPU, but for users already planning one, that is not a drawback. The Athlon's lower power draw makes it easier to cool and less demanding on power supplies. The unlocked multiplier allows users to push the chip beyond its 3.40 GHz boost clock, which could bring it in line with or ahead of the locked PRO A10-8750B in tuned systems. The data records zero benchmark wins for the Athlon, but the specification differences suggest scenarios where it could win in practice.