AMD Athlon PRO 200GE vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Comparison

The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B are both 14nm Zen-based parts, but they target different corners of the AMD lineup. The data shows a fascinating split: one processor dominates in raw multi-threaded throughput in older test suites, while the other posts decisive victories in both single-core and current multi-core workloads. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—1200 for the Athlon PRO 200GE versus 1196 for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B—placing both at the 34th percentile of all CPUs. This near-parity in overall average makes the per-test deltas all the more striking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the head-to-head data is the Cinebench R15 multi-core test. Here, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 654, which is a full 50.2% higher than the Athlon PRO 200GE’s 326. This is a massive gap, and it aligns with the structural difference between the two chips: the V1605B has four cores and eight threads, while the Athlon PRO 200GE is a dual-core, four-thread part. In a benchmark that scales well with core count, the V1605B’s extra physical cores deliver a crushing advantage. The Athlon PRO 200GE’s score of 326 is not just lower; it is half the rival’s output, a clear indication that this older test heavily rewards the V1605B’s wider core configuration.

However, the story flips when looking at the newer Cinebench R23 multi-core test. The Athlon PRO 200GE posts a score of 3243, edging out the V1605B’s 3160 by 2.6%. This is a surprising result given the R15 outcome. The delta is modest, but it shows that in the R23 workload, the Athlon PRO 200GE is not just competitive—it is the winner. This suggests that the R23 test’s instruction mix or memory access patterns favor the Athlon’s architecture, despite its core deficit. The win is narrow, but it is a win nonetheless, and it prevents the V1605B from sweeping the multi-core tests.

The single-core picture is far less ambiguous. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the V1605B scores 841, which is 45.7% higher than the Athlon PRO 200GE’s 457. This is a decisive victory for the V1605B, and it highlights a key performance characteristic: the V1605B’s boost clock of 3.60 GHz versus the Athlon’s fixed 3.20 GHz base clock. The V1605B also has a higher single-core score in the R15 test (128, though the Athlon’s R15 single-core score is not listed in the head-to-head data). The R23 single-core delta of 45.7% is the second-largest gap in the entire comparison, and it underscores that the V1605B is the superior choice for lightly-threaded, latency-sensitive tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the clear winner for older multi-threaded workloads and any single-threaded task. Its 50.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core makes it the go-to part for legacy rendering or compilation workloads that rely on that benchmark’s scaling characteristics. The 45.7% advantage in R23 single-core means it will dominate in everyday responsiveness, application launches, and any software that is still primarily single-threaded. The data indicates that for users running older software stacks, the V1605B is unequivocally the stronger performer.

The Athlon PRO 200GE’s win is narrower but no less real. Its 2.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core suggests that for modern multi-threaded workloads, the Athlon is slightly ahead. This could be due to the larger 4 MB shared L3 cache on the Athlon versus the 2 MB shared L3 on the V1605B, or perhaps the Athlon’s higher base clock of 3.20 GHz versus the V1605B’s 2000.00 MHz base clock (with boost to 3.60 GHz). The Athlon also benefits from a higher memory bandwidth rating of 42.7 GB/s, whereas the V1605B’s memory bandwidth is not listed in the data. For users whose primary applications are modern, multi-threaded, and cache-sensitive, the Athlon PRO 200GE holds a slight edge.

It is also worth noting the production status difference: the Athlon PRO 200GE is end-of-life, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is active. From a longevity and availability standpoint, the V1605B is the safer bet, but this does not change the benchmark outcomes. The wins are what they are: the V1605B takes two of the three head-to-head tests, including the two largest deltas, while the Athlon takes one narrow victory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has an average benchmark score of 1200, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 1196. The Athlon leads by 0.4% based on the nearestRivals deltaPct data, though both are at the 34th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the Ryzen Embedded V1605B faster in single-core performance?

A: Yes. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the V1605B scores 841 versus the Athlon PRO 200GE’s 457, a 45.7% advantage. The V1605B’s boost clock of 3.60 GHz contributes to this lead over the Athlon’s fixed 3.20 GHz clock.

Q: Does the Athlon PRO 200GE win any benchmark?

A: Yes. The Athlon PRO 200GE wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test with a score of 3243, beating the V1605B’s 3160 by 2.6%.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 2 cores and 4 threads. This explains the V1605B’s large 50.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core.

Q: What is the difference in TDP between the two?

A: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a TDP of 15 watts. The V1605B is rated for lower power consumption despite having more cores.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 2 MB of shared L3 cache. The Athlon has twice the L3 capacity.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The Athlon PRO 200GE is a 2-core/4-thread part with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and no boost clock, whereas the V1605B is a 4-core/8-thread part with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The TDPs differ significantly: the Athlon has a 35-watt TDP, while the V1605B has a 15-watt TDP. The sockets are different as well—the Athlon uses AMD Socket AM4, while the V1605B uses AMD Socket FP5.

Memory specifications also diverge. The Athlon PRO 200GE lists a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the V1605B’s memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. Both support DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, and neither supports ECC memory. The integrated graphics differ: the Athlon has Radeon Vega 3, while the V1605B has Radeon Vega 8. The Athlon also lists PCIe support as Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the V1605B’s PCIe configuration is not listed. The market segment differs, with the Athlon classified as Server/Workstation and the V1605B as Desktop. Finally, the Athlon PRO 200GE is end-of-life with a part number of YD200BC6M20FB, while the V1605B is active with no part number listed.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the Zen architecture using a 14nm process node from GlobalFoundries, but there are notable differences in their physical and logical structures. The Athlon PRO 200GE uses 4,800 million transistors on a 192 mm² die, while the V1605B uses 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The V1605B is slightly larger in both transistor count and die size.

The cache hierarchy differs in two key ways. The L1 cache is 96 KB per core on the Athlon, while the V1605B has 128 KB per core. The L2 cache is identical at 512 KB per core. However, the L3 cache is where a major divergence occurs: the Athlon has 4 MB shared, while the V1605B has 2 MB shared. This means the Athlon has double the L3 cache, which may explain its advantage in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test.

The codenames also differ, with the Athlon PRO 200GE listed under the generation "Athlon (Zen (Raven Ridge))" and the V1605B under "Ryzen Embedded (Zen (Great Horned Owl))". The release dates are different, with the V1605B released on 2018-02-20 and the Athlon released later on 2018-09-17. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part. The V1605B is from the 1000 series, while the Athlon has no series designation. Both share the same core architecture and process node, but the V1605B’s lower TDP and higher core count make it a distinct design targeting embedded and mobile applications, while the Athlon PRO 200GE is a more conventional desktop/server-oriented chip with a higher TDP and different cache configuration.