AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Core i5-4430S Comparison
AMD Athlon 200GE
Core i5-4430S
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Core i5-4430S
The Intel Core i5-4430S and AMD Athlon 200GE are both desktop processors, but they represent very different design philosophies and eras. The data shows a clear overall winner: the Intel part secures 7 benchmark wins out of 7 head-to-head comparisons, with its largest margin being a 45% lead in Geekbench multi-core. However, the AMD Athlon 200GE is a much newer, more power-efficient part with a significantly higher base clock and newer memory support, making it a compelling option for specific, low-power builds. The Intel Core i5-4430S wins on raw compute performance in every measured test, while the AMD Athlon 200GE counters with superior platform modernity and efficiency, as indicated by its 35W TDP compared to Intel's 65W.
The Verdict
Based strictly on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-4430S is the performance pick. It wins every single head-to-head benchmark, from a narrow 5.9% margin in Geekbench single-core to a dominant 45% margin in Geekbench multi-core. Its four physical cores give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads, evident in the 6.6% lead across all Cinebench multi-core tests (R15, R20, R23). Users prioritizing maximum compute throughput, especially in applications that scale with core count, should choose the Intel i5-4430S.
The AMD Athlon 200GE is the efficiency pick. Its 35W TDP is nearly half of the Intel's 65W TDP, and it supports faster DDR4 memory with a rated bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, whereas the Intel part is limited to DDR3. While it loses every performance benchmark, the deltas are often modest. In single-core tests, the AMD chip trails by only 5.9% to 6.5%, and in Cinebench multi-core tests, it lags by 6.6%. This indicates that for lightly-threaded tasks or power-constrained systems, the Athlon 200GE offers competitive performance per watt and a more modern platform foundation. The data suggests the AMD part is better suited for a quiet, low-power home theater PC or a basic office machine, while the Intel part is for users who need the extra multi-core headroom regardless of power draw.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and fabrication nodes. The Intel Core i5-4430S uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process, featuring 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. In contrast, the AMD Athlon 200GE is based on the Zen architecture (Raven Ridge) on a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, packing 4,950 million transistors onto a larger 209.8 mm² die.
Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Intel i5-4430S has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Intel part also has a larger shared L3 cache at 6 MB, compared to the AMD's 4 MB. However, the AMD chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, versus 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core on the Intel. This suggests the AMD design is tuned for higher per-core efficiency, while the Intel relies on more physical cores.
Memory support is another major divergence. The Intel i5-4430S uses DDR3 memory with a dual-channel bus, while the AMD Athlon 200GE supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and a rated bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part also features a newer PCIe implementation (Gen 3, 8 Lanes CPU only) and a Radeon Vega 3 integrated GPU, while the Intel uses Intel HD 4600 graphics. The Intel part uses an Intel Socket 1150, whereas the AMD uses AMD Socket AM4. The AMD processor is listed as "Active" in production, while the Intel has no production status, and its release date is earlier (2013 vs. 2018).
FAQ
Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core Cinebench tests?
A: The Intel Core i5-4430S wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 373 vs 350 in R15, 1558 vs 1461 in R20, and 3710 vs 3479 in R23, each representing a 6.6% lead over the AMD Athlon 200GE.
Q: Is the AMD Athlon 200GE competitive in single-core performance?
A: Yes, it is very close. The Intel i5-4430S leads by only 5.9% in Geekbench single-core (980 vs 925) and by 6.3% to 6.5% in Cinebench R20 and R23 single-core tests. The AMD chip's higher base clock of 3.20 GHz helps keep the gap small.
Q: What is the biggest performance disparity between the two?
A: The largest gap is in Geekbench multi-core, where the Intel Core i5-4430S scores 2773 compared to the AMD Athlon 200GE's 1912, a 45% difference. This is attributed to the Intel's two additional physical cores.
Q: Which CPU is more power-efficient?
A: The AMD Athlon 200GE has a TDP of 35W, significantly lower than the Intel Core i5-4430S's 65W TDP. This makes the AMD part more suitable for low-power or compact systems.
Q: Do these processors support the same memory type?
A: No. The Intel Core i5-4430S supports DDR3 memory, while the AMD Athlon 200GE supports DDR4. The AMD part also has a specified memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Intel.
Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i5-4430S has an average benchmark score of 1274, while the AMD Athlon 200GE has an average of 1261. This places the Intel part in the 35th percentile of all CPUs, just one point above the AMD's 34th percentile.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core i5-4430S | AMD Athlon 200GE |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 3.20 GHz | None |
| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Architecture | Haswell | Zen |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | 4,950 million |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | 209.8 mm² |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 42.7 GB/s |
| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Release Date | 2013-06-01 | 2018-09-05 |
| Production Status | Not specified | Active |
| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $55 |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark results paint a consistent picture: the Intel Core i5-4430S outperforms the AMD Athlon 200GE in every test, but the margin varies significantly by workload. The most striking result is in Geekbench multi-core, where the Intel part scores 2773 against the AMD's 1912. This 45% difference is the largest of any benchmark and highlights the impact of the Intel's four physical cores versus the AMD's two cores.
In Cinebench multi-core tests, the Intel wins are consistent but much narrower. In Cinebench R15, the i5-4430S scores 373 versus 350, a 6.6% lead. The same 6.6% delta appears in Cinebench R20 (1558 vs 1461) and Cinebench R23 (3710 vs 3479). This consistency suggests a stable performance advantage in threaded rendering workloads, likely due to the extra cores, though the AMD's higher clock speed and newer architecture prevent a larger gap.
Single-core results show the closest competition. In Geekbench single-core, the Intel wins 980 to 925, a 5.9% margin. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Intel scores 219 against 206, a 6.3% lead, and in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel wins 523 to 491, a 6.5% margin. These figures indicate that while the AMD Athlon 200GE has a higher base clock (3.20 GHz vs 2.70 GHz), the Intel's boost clock of 3.20 GHz and older architecture still provide a slight edge in single-threaded performance.
The overall average benchmark scores reflect the head-to-head results. The Intel Core i5-4430S has an average score of 1274, placing it at the 35th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Athlon 200GE has an average of 1261, at the 34th percentile. The Intel's nearest rival is the Intel Atom x7425E, with a deltaPct of 0.1%, while the AMD's closest rival is the Intel Core i7-3615QM, with a deltaPct of 0.0%. This proximity in average scores indicates that despite the Intel's 7-0 win streak, the overall performance levels are extremely close, with the differences concentrated in specific multi-threaded workloads.