AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Core i5-3570K Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Athlon 200GE

CORE STATE Zen
CORE SPECS 2 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base
CACHE 4 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-3570K

CORE STATE Ivy Bridge
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 3.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 77W
ARCHITECTURE Ivy Bridge
nm
PROCESS 22 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2012

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
350
425
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
1,461
1,772
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
206
250
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
3,479
4,221
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
491
596
geekbench_multicore
1,912
2,245
geekbench_singlecore
925
776
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
60

Analysis: AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Core i5-3570K

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits this comparison into two distinct territories. The Intel Core i5-3570K claims victory in six of the seven recorded head-to-head tests, establishing dominance across nearly every multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench workload. The AMD Athlon 200GE secures exactly one win, but it is a meaningful one: Geekbench single-core performance.

Looking at the Cinebench suite, the Intel part wins all five recorded tests. The margins are remarkably consistent, with the Intel processor leading by 21.3% to 21.4% across Cinebench R15 multicore, R20 multicore, R20 single-core, R23 multicore, and R23 single-core. This uniformity suggests a stable performance advantage that scales evenly regardless of workload type or render complexity. The Intel chip does not merely win; it wins by nearly the same proportion in every Cinebench scenario, which points to a fundamental throughput advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

Geekbench tells a more nuanced story. The Intel Core i5-3570K leads in Geekbench multicore with a score of 2245 against 1912, a 17.4% margin. Yet the AMD Athlon 200GE counters with a decisive Geekbench single-core victory, scoring 925 against Intel's 776, a 16.1% advantage in the other direction. This is the only test where the AMD part comes out ahead, and the margin is substantial. The data indicates that for lightly threaded, short-burst workloads that resemble Geekbench's single-core test, the Athlon 200GE has a real edge.

The use-case split follows directly from these results. The Intel Core i5-3570K is the choice for Cinebench-class rendering, multi-threaded productivity, and any workload where consistent throughput across all cores matters. The AMD Athlon 200GE is the choice for single-threaded responsiveness in the specific pattern measured by Geekbench, where its higher per-core score translates into faster execution of tasks that cannot use multiple threads effectively.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras and design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-3570K uses the Ivy Bridge architecture on a 22 nm process node, manufactured by Intel, while the AMD Athlon 200GE uses the Zen architecture on a 14 nm process node, manufactured by GlobalFoundries. The process node difference matters because the Intel part achieves its performance on a denser, more mature manufacturing process, whereas the AMD part relies on a larger node but compensates with architectural efficiency.

Core counts differ significantly. The Intel chip provides 4 physical cores and 4 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The AMD chip provides 2 physical cores and 4 threads via simultaneous multithreading, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and no boost clock listed in the database. Despite having half the physical cores, the AMD part still manages competitive average benchmark scores, which indicates that its Zen architecture extracts more work per core than the older Ivy Bridge design.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The Intel Core i5-3570K carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Athlon 200GE carries 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, while the Intel part has a larger shared L3 pool. The transistor counts reflect the design differences: the Intel chip integrates 1,400 million transistors on a 160 mm² die, while the AMD chip integrates 4,950 million transistors on a 209.8 mm² die. The AMD die includes a Radeon Vega 3 integrated GPU, which explains part of the transistor budget.

Memory support differs by generation. The Intel processor uses DDR3 memory with dual-channel support and 25.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD processor uses DDR4 memory with dual-channel support and 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part's higher memory bandwidth is a clear architectural advantage, even if the benchmark results do not always reflect it. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Intel chip provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD chip provides Gen 3 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

The Intel Core i5-3570K has an unlocked multiplier, making it overclockable, while the AMD Athlon 200GE does not. The Intel part is end-of-life, released in 2012, while the AMD part is active production, released in 2018. The Intel chip draws 77 W TDP, the AMD chip draws 35 W TDP. The AMD part's much lower power envelope, combined with its newer architecture, explains how a 2-core processor can produce average benchmark scores within a few percentage points of a 4-core processor from six years earlier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head results show a consistent pattern with one notable exception. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel Core i5-3570K scores 425 against the AMD Athlon 200GE's 350, a 21.4% advantage. The same margin appears in Cinebench R20 multicore, where Intel scores 1772 against AMD's 1461, a 21.3% lead. Cinebench R23 multicore follows with Intel at 4221 and AMD at 3479, again a 21.3% margin. The consistency of these multicore results across three different Cinebench versions indicates that the Intel part's two additional physical cores provide a stable, proportional advantage in heavily threaded rendering workloads.

Single-core Cinebench results mirror the multicore pattern rather than the Geekbench pattern. In Cinebench R20 single-core, Intel scores 250 against AMD's 206, a 21.4% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 596 against AMD's 491, also a 21.4% lead. This is notable because the AMD part wins Geekbench single-core, yet loses every Cinebench single-core test by the same margin as the multicore tests. The discrepancy suggests that Cinebench's single-threaded workload responds to different architectural strengths than Geekbench's single-threaded workload. The Intel Ivy Bridge architecture holds a consistent edge in Cinebench's rendering pipeline, while the AMD Zen architecture excels in the specific operations Geekbench measures.

Geekbench multicore gives Intel a 2245 to 1912 win, a 17.4% margin. This is the smallest Intel victory in the dataset, indicating that the AMD part's 4-thread configuration narrows the gap when the workload is less dependent on raw core count. The AMD Athlon 200GE's simultaneous multithreading allows its 2 physical cores to present 4 threads, which helps in Geekbench multicore but cannot fully overcome the Intel part's four dedicated physical cores.

The single AMD victory comes in Geekbench single-core, where the Athlon 200GE scores 925 against the Intel part's 776, a 16.1% margin. This is the only test where the AMD chip leads, and the margin is substantial enough to suggest a real architectural strength. The Zen core design, with its larger per-core caches and modern instruction handling, delivers meaningfully better single-threaded performance in this specific benchmark. For users whose workloads resemble Geekbench single-core, the AMD part is the faster processor despite its lower core count and older process node.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570K wins 6 of the 7 recorded head-to-head tests. The AMD Athlon 200GE wins 1 test.

Q: What is the AMD Athlon 200GE's single benchmark victory?

A: The AMD Athlon 200GE wins Geekbench single-core, scoring 925 against the Intel Core i5-3570K's 776, a 16.1% advantage.

Q: How consistent is the Intel Core i5-3570K's Cinebench advantage?

A: The Intel part leads by 21.3% to 21.4% across all five recorded Cinebench tests, covering both multicore and single-core workloads in R15, R20, and R23 versions.

Q: Do the two processors have the same number of cores?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-3570K has 4 cores and 4 threads. The AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570K has an average benchmark score of 1293, placing it in the 35th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Athlon 200GE has an average benchmark score of 1261, placing it in the 34th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth rating?

A: The AMD Athlon 200GE has a higher memory bandwidth rating at 42.7 GB/s, compared to the Intel Core i5-3570K's 25.6 GB/s.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split recommendation. For multi-threaded rendering workloads, specifically those measured by the Cinebench suite, the Intel Core i5-3570K is the stronger processor. It wins every Cinebench test by roughly 21%, whether the workload uses one core or all four. The two additional physical cores provide a consistent throughput advantage that the AMD Athlon 200GE cannot overcome, despite its newer architecture and higher memory bandwidth.

For single-threaded workloads that resemble Geekbench single-core, the AMD Athlon 200GE is the faster processor. Its 16.1% lead in that specific test is the largest margin recorded in either direction, and it suggests that Zen's per-core efficiency delivers genuine performance benefits for lightly threaded tasks. The AMD part also achieves this with a 35 W TDP, less than half the Intel chip's 77 W TDP, and with half the physical cores.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar story with different emphasis. The Intel Core i5-3570K averages 1293 across all recorded tests, while the AMD Athlon 200GE averages 1261. The difference is only 2.5%, which places both processors within a narrow performance band. The Intel part sits in the 35th percentile of all CPUs, the AMD part in the 34th. These near-identical averages mask the very different performance profiles underneath: the Intel chip wins heavily in Cinebench, the AMD chip wins heavily in Geekbench single-core.

Users who run Cinebench-class rendering or multi-threaded productivity should choose the Intel Core i5-3570K. Users whose primary workloads are single-threaded and resemble the Geekbench single-core pattern should choose the AMD Athlon 200GE. The AMD part's lower power consumption and active production status are additional considerations, but the benchmark data alone justifies both selections depending on workload.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i5-3570K has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks are 3.40 GHz for Intel and 3.20 GHz for AMD. The Intel part has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz; the AMD part has no boost clock listed. TDP ratings are 77 W for Intel and 35 W for AMD.

The Intel chip uses the Ivy Bridge architecture on a 22 nm process, with 1,400 million transistors on a 160 mm² die. The AMD chip uses the Zen architecture on a 14 nm process, with 4,950 million transistors on a 209.8 mm² die. Cache configurations differ: Intel has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core with 6 MB shared L3, while AMD has 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core with 4 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs by generation. The Intel part uses DDR3 with 25.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD part uses DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe configurations differ: Intel provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, AMD provides Gen 3 with 8 CPU lanes. The Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier; the AMD chip does not. The Intel part is end-of-life and was released in 2012, while the AMD part is active production and was released in 2018. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $212, the AMD part a launch MSRP of $55.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Athlon 200GE
i5-3570K
Core Specs
Cores
2
4 +100.0%
Threads
4
4 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.2
3.4 +6.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
—
3.8
Frequency (GHz)
3.2
3.4 +6.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
—
3.8
Multiplier
32
34 +6.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
96 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB (shared)
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
77 +120.0%
Architecture
Architecture
Zen
Ivy Bridge
Codename
Zen
Ivy Bridge
Generation
Athlon (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Core i5 (Ivy Bridge)
Process Size
14 nm
22 nm
Transistors
4,950 million
1,400 million
Die Size
209.8 mm²
160 mm²
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR3
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
42.7 GB/s
25.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1155
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series, AMD 400 Series
—
PCIe
Gen 3, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 3
Intel HD 4000
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$55
$212
Part Number
YD200GC6M20FB
SR0PM
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA12C
Tj Max
95°C
—
View Athlon 200GE Details View Core i5-3570K Details