AMD A8-9600 vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a consistent advantage for the Intel Core i3-1110G4 across every shared Cinebench test. In the multi-core Cinebench R15 test, the Intel part scores 322 against 281 for the AMD A8-9600, a difference of 14.6%. The same pattern holds in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the Intel chip posts 1344 points versus 1174 for the AMD, a 14.5% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel processor reaches 3202 while the AMD A8-9600 manages 2797, again a 14.5% gap.

Single-core results tell the same story, with slightly larger relative differences. The Intel Core i3-1110G4 scores 189 in Cinebench R20 single-core, while the AMD A8-9600 scores 165, a 14.5% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel part records 452 against 394 for the AMD, a 14.7% advantage, the largest delta in the entire comparison.

The head-to-head summary confirms the sweep: the Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins all five shared tests, with the AMD A8-9600 taking none. The deltas are remarkably uniform, hovering between 14.5% and 14.7% across every workload. This consistency suggests the performance gap is structural rather than workload-specific. Notably, the Intel chip accomplishes this with only 2 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Intel processor's higher boost clock of 3.90 GHz, compared to 3.40 GHz for the AMD, likely contributes to the single-core advantage, while the architectural efficiency of Tiger Lake appears to offset the core-count deficit in multi-threaded tests.

For context, the Intel Core i3-1110G4 has an average benchmark score of 945, placing it at the 25th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD A8-7670K (944, 0.1% delta), the AMD Phenom II X6 1045T (946, -0.1%), the Intel Xeon X5560 (946, -0.1%), and the Intel Pentium Gold G5400T (946, -0.1%). The AMD A8-9600 has an average benchmark score of 962, placing it at the 26th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Pentium Gold G5500T (963, -0.1%), the Intel Core i3-4360T (963, -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 (958, 0.4%), and the Intel Celeron N5100 (966, -0.5%). Despite the AMD A8-9600 having a slightly higher average score and percentile, the head-to-head data shows the Intel chip winning decisively in every direct comparison.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins in every category where both processors have recorded scores. This includes multi-core workloads across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as single-core workloads in Cinebench R20 and R23. The Intel part's advantage is consistent, ranging from 14.5% to 14.7%, which makes it the clear choice for both lightly threaded and heavily threaded applications.

The AMD A8-9600, despite having more cores (4 versus 2), does not win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Its single-core scores are particularly weak relative to the Intel part, with a 14.5% deficit in Cinebench R20 single-core and a 14.7% deficit in Cinebench R23 single-core. Even in multi-core tests, where the AMD chip's additional cores could theoretically help, it still trails by 14.5% to 14.6%. This suggests that the Excavator architecture's older design and lower boost clock cannot compensate for the Intel Tiger Lake processor's modern instructions per clock (IPC) and higher clock speed.

For users prioritizing single-threaded responsiveness, such as web browsing, office productivity, or light coding, the Intel Core i3-1110G4 is the superior choice based on the data. For users prioritizing multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the Intel part also wins, despite having fewer cores. The only area where the AMD A8-9600 might hold an edge is in its socket compatibility, as it uses the AMD Socket AM4, which is common in desktop systems, while the Intel chip uses the BGA 1598 socket, typically found in mobile devices. However, this is a platform consideration, not a performance one.

The data also shows that the Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a higher memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s compared to 38.4 GB/s for the AMD A8-9600. This memory bandwidth advantage likely contributes to the Intel part's performance in memory-sensitive workloads, although the benchmark scores alone do not isolate this factor.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-1110G4 outperforms the AMD A8-9600 in every head-to-head test. Users seeking better raw CPU performance, whether for single-core or multi-core tasks, should choose the Intel part. The Intel chip delivers a 14.5% to 14.7% advantage across all Cinebench variants, with no workload where the AMD A8-9600 closes the gap.

The AMD A8-9600, while having more cores and a higher base clock (3.10 GHz versus 1.80 GHz for the Intel part), cannot overcome its older Excavator architecture and lower boost clock. Its average benchmark score of 962 is slightly higher than the Intel's 945, but this is due to the different mix of benchmark data and does not reflect direct competition. In head-to-head tests, the Intel chip wins all five.

For mobile users, the Intel Core i3-1110G4 is the clear pick, given its lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts for the AMD part, which is a significant efficiency advantage. For desktop users, the AMD A8-9600 offers a standard AM4 socket, which may be easier to integrate into existing systems, but the performance data does not support choosing it over the Intel part on merit. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core i3-1110G4 is the superior processor in every measured dimension.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in single-core benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins in both shared single-core tests. It scores 189 versus 165 in Cinebench R20 single-core (14.5% higher) and 452 versus 394 in Cinebench R23 single-core (14.7% higher).

Q: Does the AMD A8-9600's higher core count help in multi-core tests?

A: No. Despite having 4 cores versus 2, the AMD A8-9600 loses all multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 3202 versus 2797 for the AMD, a 14.5% deficit for the AMD chip.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has an average benchmark score of 945, while the AMD A8-9600 has an average score of 962. The AMD part sits at the 26th percentile of all CPUs, slightly above the Intel's 25th percentile.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 supports 59.7 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the AMD A8-9600 supports 38.4 GB/s. Both use dual-channel DDR4 memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the AMD A8-9600 has a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The Intel part also has a lower base clock of 1.80 GHz versus 3.10 GHz for the AMD.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor in the database?

A: For the Intel Core i3-1110G4, the nearest rivals are the AMD A8-7670K (944, 0.1% delta), AMD Phenom II X6 1045T (946, -0.1%), Intel Xeon X5560 (946, -0.1%), and Intel Pentium Gold G5400T (946, -0.1%). For the AMD A8-9600, the nearest rivals are the Intel Pentium Gold G5500T (963, -0.1%), Intel Core i3-4360T (963, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 (958, 0.4%), and Intel Celeron N5100 (966, -0.5%).

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 is built on the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically the Tiger Lake-U codename, using a 10 nm process node from Intel. The core generation is listed as Core i3 (Willow Cove-U). This modern architecture provides high instructions per clock (IPC) and efficient power usage. The processor has 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics G4, and the processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The AMD A8-9600 is built on the Excavator architecture, with the codename Bristol Ridge, using a 28 nm process node from GlobalFoundries. The generation is listed as A8 (Bristol Ridge). This is an older, less efficient architecture compared to Tiger Lake. The processor has 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. Its cache consists of 320 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with no L3 cache listed. The integrated graphics are Radeon R7, and the processor supports PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part has 3,100 million transistors and a die size of 250 mm², while the Intel part does not have transistor or die size data in the database.

The key architectural difference is the process node: 10 nm for Intel versus 28 nm for AMD. This translates into better power efficiency and higher clock speeds for the Intel part, as reflected in its lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts for the AMD. The Intel chip also has a more advanced cache design with a shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip relies solely on L2 cache. The PCIe generation difference (Gen 4 versus Gen 3) and lane count (16 versus 8) also favor the Intel processor for peripheral connectivity.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors, based on the database records.

First, core and thread counts differ: the Intel Core i3-1110G4 has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Clock speeds differ: the Intel part has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the AMD part has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the Intel chip is rated at 15 watts, while the AMD chip is rated at 65 watts.

Socket types differ: the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1598, while the AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM4.

Process nodes differ: the Intel chip is built on a 10 nm node from Intel, while the AMD chip is built on a 28 nm node from GlobalFoundries.

Cache configurations differ: the Intel chip has 96 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache; the AMD chip has 320 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with no L3 cache.

Memory bandwidth differs: the Intel chip supports 59.7 GB/s, while the AMD chip supports 38.4 GB/s.

PCIe support differs: the Intel chip supports Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD chip supports Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ: the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics G4, while the AMD chip uses Radeon R7.

Market segments differ: the Intel chip is for mobile devices, while the AMD chip is for desktop systems.

Transistor count and die size are listed only for the AMD chip: 3,100 million transistors and 250 mm², respectively; no such data is available for the Intel chip.

Release dates differ: the Intel chip was released on September 1, 2020, while the AMD chip was released on July 26, 2017.

The part number for the AMD chip is AD9600AGABBOXAD9600AGM44AB; no part number is listed for the Intel chip.

Both processors support dual-channel DDR4 memory and do not support ECC memory or unlocked multipliers.