AMD A10-9700E vs Intel Core i3-1110G4 Comparison

The AMD A10-9700E and Intel Core i3-1110G4 are two very different processors that land in the same performance bracket, but they achieve that position through opposite design philosophies. The AMD chip is a 35W desktop part built on a mature 28nm process with four physical cores, while the Intel chip is a 15W mobile part on a modern 10nm process with only two cores but four threads. Benchmark data shows the Intel part wins every single head-to-head test, yet the AMD part holds its own in overall average scores, making the choice between them a matter of platform fit rather than raw capability.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD A10-9700E has an average benchmark score of 951, which is slightly higher than the Intel Core i3-1110G4's average of 945. The difference is just 6 points, or roughly 0.6%, placing both chips in the 25th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core rendering performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins all multi-core tests by a consistent margin of 13.7%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 3202 versus AMD's 2762, and in Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 322 versus AMD's 278.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 boosts to 3.90 GHz, which is higher than the AMD A10-9700E's 3.50 GHz boost clock. Intel's base clock is also configurable, listed at 1800.00 MHz, while AMD's base clock is fixed at 3.00 GHz.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 offers significantly higher memory bandwidth at 59.7 GB/s, compared to the AMD A10-9700E's 38.4 GB/s. Both support dual-channel DDR4 memory.

Q: Which CPU supports PCIe Gen 4?

A: The Intel Core i3-1110G4 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD A10-9700E is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), giving Intel a substantial advantage for modern expansion cards and NVMe storage.

Q: How do the single-core scores compare between the two?

A: Intel wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 452 versus AMD's 390, a 13.7% advantage. In Cinebench R20 single-core, Intel scores 189 versus AMD's 163, a 13.8% margin.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins all five head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with a consistent 13.7% to 13.8% lead across both single-core and multi-core workloads. If you are choosing purely on benchmark performance, the Intel chip is the clear winner. However, the AMD A10-9700E is not a loser in the broader context — its average benchmark score of 951 actually edges out Intel's 945, and it matches Intel's 25th percentile standing among all CPUs.

The real deciding factor is platform and use case. The AMD A10-9700E is a desktop processor on Socket AM4, meaning it fits into standard desktop motherboards and is not limited by laptop thermal constraints. The Intel Core i3-1110G4 is a mobile chip on BGA 1598, which means it is soldered to the board and typically appears in ultra-portable laptops. If you are building a desktop and need a low-power 35W drop-in for an AM4 board, the AMD chip is the only option. If you are evaluating a laptop purchase, the Intel chip delivers better performance per watt at 15W TDP.

For pure compute throughput, pick the Intel Core i3-1110G4. For desktop compatibility and a slightly higher aggregate benchmark score, the AMD A10-9700E is defensible. Neither chip is a performance leader — both sit at the 25th percentile — but they serve different physical environments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 dominates every benchmark test, and the margins are remarkably uniform. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 322 while AMD scores 278, giving Intel a 13.7% advantage. The same 13.7% gap appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where Intel scores 1344 versus AMD's 1160. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows the same pattern: Intel scores 3202, AMD scores 2762, again a 13.7% difference.

Single-core performance tells an identical story. In Cinebench R20 single-core, Intel scores 189 against AMD's 163, a 13.8% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 452 versus AMD's 390, which is a 13.7% advantage. The consistency of these deltas suggests the Intel chip's architectural efficiency advantage is uniform across all workload types, rather than being specific to certain instruction mixes.

The only test where AMD is not directly compared is Cinebench R15 single-core — the AMD chip has no score listed for that test, while Intel scores 160.4. In the multi-core R15 test, Intel's 322 beats AMD's 278 by the same 13.7% margin seen elsewhere. The head-to-head table shows AMD wins zero tests, and Intel wins five.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The AMD A10-9700E has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Core i3-1110G4 has 2 cores and 4 threads — meaning Intel trades physical core count for simultaneous multithreading to match thread count. Base clocks diverge sharply: AMD runs at 3.00 GHz fixed, while Intel's base is listed at 1800.00 MHz but boosts to 3.90 GHz, which is higher than AMD's 3.50 GHz boost.

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The AMD part draws 35W TDP, while the Intel part is rated at just 15W TDP, a 20W difference that makes Intel far more suitable for thin-and-light mobile designs. Sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM4, Intel uses BGA 1598. Process technology also separates them — AMD is on GlobalFoundries' 28nm node with 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die, while Intel is on its own 10nm node with no transistor or die size listed.

Cache configurations are entirely different. AMD has 320 KB L1 and 2 MB L2, with no L3 cache. Intel has 96 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory bandwidth favors Intel at 59.7 GB/s versus AMD's 38.4 GB/s. PCIe support is also different: Intel provides 16 Gen 4 lanes, AMD provides 8 Gen 3 lanes. Both support DDR4 dual-channel memory, neither supports ECC, and both are unlocked for multiplier adjustments.

Architecture Differences

The AMD A10-9700E is built on the Excavator architecture, codenamed Bristol Ridge, which is a 28nm design from GlobalFoundries. This is a mature, older architecture that relies on four full physical cores to deliver its performance. The die size is 250 mm² and packs 3,100 million transistors. AMD's integrated graphics are Radeon R7, and the chip was released on 2017-07-26.

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 uses the Tiger Lake architecture, codenamed Tiger Lake-U, built on Intel's 10nm process. This is a much newer design (released 2020-09-01) that uses two Willow Cove cores with Hyper-Threading to reach four threads. Intel's architecture is notably more efficient per clock, which explains how a 2-core chip at 15W can beat a 4-core chip at 35W in every benchmark. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics G4.

The architectural gap is most visible in single-core performance, where Intel's 10nm Willow Cove cores score 452 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus AMD's 390. That 13.7% lead in single-threaded work comes from a combination of higher boost clock (3.90 GHz vs 3.50 GHz) and superior instructions-per-clock from the newer architecture. Intel also benefits from 6 MB of shared L3 cache, which AMD lacks entirely.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 wins everywhere that compute performance matters. It is faster in multi-threaded rendering, as shown by the 13.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core (3202 vs 2762) and the same margin in Cinebench R20 multi-core (1344 vs 1160). It is also faster in single-threaded tasks, winning Cinebench R20 single-core by 13.8% (189 vs 163) and Cinebench R23 single-core by 13.7% (452 vs 390). For any workload that is CPU-bound — whether that is video encoding, 3D rendering, or general productivity — the Intel chip is the better performer.

The AMD A10-9700E's wins are not in benchmark scores but in platform characteristics. It offers a desktop socket (AM4) that allows for easy upgrades and replacement, whereas Intel's BGA 1598 is soldered and non-upgradable. AMD also has a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus Intel's 1800.00 MHz, which means it delivers consistent performance without relying on boost behavior. The AMD chip's 35W TDP, while higher than Intel's 15W, is still low for a desktop part and fits into compact AM4 builds.

For memory capacity, AMD's 38.4 GB/s bandwidth is lower than Intel's 59.7 GB/s, but both support dual-channel DDR4, so the difference only matters in memory-intensive tasks. The AMD chip's 4 physical cores may also be preferable in scenarios where true parallel execution without SMT overhead is desired, though the benchmark data shows no such advantage materializing. In practical terms, choose AMD for AM4 desktop compatibility and a slightly higher aggregate benchmark score; choose Intel for every measurable performance metric and drastically lower power consumption.