AMD A10-5800B vs Intel Pentium Silver J5005 Comparison

The AMD A10-5800B and Intel Pentium Silver J5005 are both four-core, four-thread processors aimed at low-cost computing, but they come from very different eras and design philosophies. The recorded data in the database shows that both chips land at the 21st percentile of all CPUs, yet their average benchmark scores differ by only a small margin. The A10-5800B posts an average score of 794, while the J5005 records 776, a gap of roughly 2%. This near-parity in overall standing masks significant differences in how each processor achieves its performance, with the AMD chip relying on raw clock speed and the Intel part depending on architectural efficiency. Benchmark results indicate that the A10-5800B holds a clear edge in single-core workloads, while the J5005 counters with superior multi-core scores in modern rendering tests, making the choice highly dependent on the intended use case.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, so the analysis relies on their respective benchmark suites. The A10-5800B has recorded scores in Geekbench tests, where it achieves 1128 in multi-core and 459 in single-core. The J5005, by contrast, has been tested across multiple Cinebench versions, including R15, R20, and R23. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the J5005 scores 268, and in single-core it records 78.3. In the newer Cinebench R20, the same processor scores 1117 multi-core and 157 single-core. The most recent test, Cinebench R23, shows the J5005 reaching 2660 multi-core and 375 single-core.

These numbers reveal a clear pattern. The A10-5800B, with its 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock, dominates in older, clock-sensitive workloads. The Geekbench single-core score of 459 is particularly telling, as it reflects the AMD processor's ability to execute single-threaded tasks quickly. The J5005, with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2.80 GHz, cannot match this raw frequency advantage. However, the Cinebench results for the J5005 show that it scales well across cores in modern rendering benchmarks, suggesting that its Goldmont Plus architecture is more efficient per clock.

The average benchmark scores place the A10-5800B at 794, which is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770, one of its nearest rivals. The J5005 averages 776, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i3-3250T and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Celeron G5920. These comparisons highlight that while the two processors are close in overall standing, their performance profiles diverge sharply. The A10-5800B relies on high clock speeds to push through legacy workloads, while the J5005 compensates for lower clocks with architectural improvements that yield better results in multi-threaded rendering.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The A10-5800B is built on AMD's Piledriver architecture, codenamed Trinity, and manufactured on a 32 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 1,303 million transistors on a 246 mm² die. The J5005 uses Intel's Goldmont Plus architecture, codenamed Gemini Lake, and is fabricated on a 14 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 93 mm², and the database does not list a transistor count for this part.

Cache configurations also differ. The A10-5800B has 192 KB of L1 cache and 4 MB of shared L2 cache, with no L3 cache. The J5005 has 56 KB of L1 cache per core and 4 MB of shared L2 cache, also without L3 cache. While the total L2 cache is identical at 4 MB, the per-core L1 allocation is notably smaller on the Intel chip. This suggests that the A10-5800B may have an advantage in workloads that repeatedly access small data sets, while the J5005's larger shared L2 could benefit multi-threaded tasks.

Memory support is another key differentiator. The A10-5800B supports DDR3 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering a maximum bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. The J5005 supports DDR4 memory, also dual-channel, but with a higher bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. This 8.5 GB/s advantage for the Intel part reflects the newer memory standard and contributes to its stronger performance in memory-intensive applications. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both operate on PCIe Gen 2, with the J5005 limited to 6 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics are also different. The A10-5800B includes a Radeon HD 7660D, while the J5005 features UHD Graphics 605. The database does not provide direct performance comparisons for these iGPUs, but the architectural differences are clear: the AMD part is a desktop-oriented APU from 2012, while the Intel part is a mobile-focused SoC from 2017.

Where Each One Wins

The A10-5800B wins in scenarios that demand high clock speeds and legacy software compatibility. Its 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock are significantly higher than the J5005's 1500 MHz base and 2.80 GHz boost. This makes the AMD processor the better choice for older applications that are not optimized for multi-threading, such as legacy office suites, web browsing with single-threaded JavaScript, or older games that rely on a single core. The Geekbench single-core score of 459 supports this, as it outpaces what the J5005 could achieve in comparable tests, though direct comparisons are not available in the database.

The J5005 wins in modern multi-threaded workloads, particularly rendering tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 2660 is a strong indicator that the Intel processor scales efficiently across its four cores. The 14 nm process and Goldmont Plus architecture allow it to maintain competitive performance while drawing significantly less power, though the database does not include power consumption figures for comparison. The J5005's higher memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s also gives it an edge in tasks that stream large data sets, such as video encoding or scientific simulations.

For everyday general-purpose computing, the choice is less clear. The A10-5800B's higher clock speeds make it feel snappier in single-threaded interactions, but the J5005's architectural efficiency and newer memory support may provide better sustained performance in mixed workloads. The database shows both chips at the 21st percentile of all CPUs, indicating that neither is a performance leader, but each excels in its own niche.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD A10-5800B has an average benchmark score of 794, while the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 averages 776. The difference is approximately 2%, with the AMD part holding a slight edge.

Q: How do their single-core performances compare?

A: The A10-5800B records a Geekbench single-core score of 459, while the J5005 achieves 78.3 in Cinebench R15 single-core and 375 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These are different tests, so direct comparison is not possible, but the AMD processor's higher clock speeds suggest an advantage in single-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD A10-5800B has a TDP of 100 watts, while the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has a TDP of 10 watts. The Intel part draws significantly less power, making it more suitable for compact or fanless designs.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, neither the AMD A10-5800B nor the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 supports ECC memory.

Q: What are their memory bandwidth specifications?

A: The A10-5800B supports DDR3 memory with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s, while the J5005 supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Intel processor has the higher memory bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a larger die size?

A: The AMD A10-5800B has a die size of 246 mm², while the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has a die size of 93 mm². The AMD chip is significantly larger, reflecting its 32 nm process node and older architecture.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The A10-5800B has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, while the J5005 has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2.80 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 100 watts, compared to the J5005's 10 watts. The socket types are different: the A10-5800B uses AMD Socket FM2, while the J5005 uses Intel BGA 1090.

The architectures are distinct, with the A10-5800B based on Piledriver and the J5005 based on Goldmont Plus. The process nodes are 32 nm for AMD and 14 nm for Intel. The transistor count for the A10-5800B is 1,303 million, while the J5005 does not have a listed transistor count. Die sizes are 246 mm² for the AMD part and 93 mm² for the Intel part.

Cache configurations differ in L1 size: the A10-5800B has 192 KB total, while the J5005 has 56 KB per core. Both have 4 MB of shared L2 cache and no L3 cache. Memory support differs, with the A10-5800B using DDR3 and the J5005 using DDR4. Memory bandwidth is 29.9 GB/s for the AMD part and 38.4 GB/s for the Intel part. PCIe support is Gen 2 for both, but the J5005 specifies 6 lanes from the CPU only.

The integrated graphics are also different: the A10-5800B has a Radeon HD 7660D, while the J5005 has UHD Graphics 605. The market segment is Desktop for the AMD part and Mobile for the Intel part. Release dates are October 2012 for the A10-5800B and December 2017 for the J5005. The J5005 has a launch MSRP of $161, while the A10-5800B does not have a listed launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD A10-5800B is the better choice for users running legacy software that depends on high clock speeds. Its 3.80 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clocks are unmatched by the J5005, and its Geekbench single-core score of 459 demonstrates strength in single-threaded tasks. The A10-5800B also holds a slight edge in average benchmark score at 794 versus 776, making it the more balanced performer in the database's overall ranking.

The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is the better option for modern, multi-threaded workloads and power-sensitive applications. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 2660 shows that it handles rendering tasks effectively, and its 10-watt TDP makes it far more efficient than the 100-watt A10-5800B. The J5005's DDR4 memory support and higher bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s further enhance its suitability for newer systems.

Users who prioritize raw clock speed and legacy compatibility should choose the A10-5800B. Users who need efficient multi-core performance for modern applications, or who require a low-power processor for mobile or compact systems, should choose the J5005. Both processors occupy the same performance tier, but their strengths lie in different areas. The A10-5800B wins on single-core and overall average score, while the J5005 wins on architectural efficiency and multi-core rendering. The choice ultimately depends on whether the workload is old and clock-sensitive or new and thread-hungry.