AMD A10-5800B vs Intel Celeron G5920 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Celeron G5920 and the AMD A10-5800B. Instead, the database provides separate benchmark suites for each processor, which makes direct comparison difficult but still informative when examined side by side.

The Intel Celeron G5920 was measured across the Cinebench suite, a demanding rendering workload. Its multi-core scores are 226 in Cinebench R15, 945 in Cinebench R20, and 2252 in Cinebench R23. Single-core results are 133 in Cinebench R20 and 318 in Cinebench R23. These numbers place the Celeron at the 21st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 775.

The AMD A10-5800B was measured using Geekbench, yielding a multi-core score of 1128 and a single-core score of 459. Its average benchmark score is 794, which places it at the 21st percentile as well. Interestingly, both processors land on the same percentile despite the A10 having a higher average raw score, which indicates that the percentile calculation accounts for the distribution of scores across the entire database.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each processor provides additional context. The Celeron G5920's closest match is the Intel Core i3-3250T with an identical average score of 775, showing a 0% delta. The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 scores 776 (0.1% higher), the AMD Athlon X4 760K scores 777 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i7-3687U scores 773 (0.3% lower). The A10-5800B's nearest rivals include the AMD A6-9400 at 794 (0.1% lower), the AMD A10-7850K at 796 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G at 797 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 at 790 (0.5% lower).

The most notable difference in the data is the A10-5800B's higher raw average score of 794 versus the Celeron's 775, a gap of 19 points. However, the Celeron's single-core performance in Cinebench R23 (318) suggests a strong per-thread capability, which is typical of newer architectures with higher instructions per clock. The A10's Geekbench single-core score of 459, while from a different test, indicates a lower per-core output relative to its multi-core result.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD A10-5800B has an average benchmark score of 794, while the Intel Celeron G5920 scores 775. The A10 leads by 19 points, though both sit at the 21st percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two?

A: The AMD A10-5800B has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Celeron G5920 has 2 cores and 2 threads. The A10 offers double the physical cores, which can benefit multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The AMD A10-5800B was released on 2012-10-01, while the Intel Celeron G5920 was released on 2020-04-29. The Celeron is roughly seven and a half years newer.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The Intel Celeron G5920 has a production status of "Active," while the AMD A10-5800B is marked as "End-of-life."

Q: What integrated graphics do they feature?

A: The Intel Celeron G5920 includes Intel UHD 610 graphics, while the AMD A10-5800B includes a Radeon HD 7660D. The A10's graphics are part of its APU design, integrating the GPU on the same die.

Q: Do they support the same memory type?

A: No. The Intel Celeron G5920 supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD A10-5800B supports DDR3 memory, also dual-channel, but with a lower bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and eras. The Intel Celeron G5920 is built on the Comet Lake architecture, using a 14 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. It belongs to the Celeron generation within the Comet Lake family. In contrast, the AMD A10-5800B uses the Piledriver architecture, codenamed Trinity, built on a 32 nm process node from GlobalFoundries. The process node difference is significant: 14 nm versus 32 nm, which typically translates to better power efficiency and higher transistor density for the newer Intel part.

The transistor counts reflect this generational gap. The AMD A10-5800B contains 1,303 million transistors on a 246 mm² die. The Intel Celeron G5920's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database, but the architectural differences are clear from the cache structures. The Celeron has a per-core L1 cache of 64 KB and per-core L2 cache of 256 KB, plus a shared 2 MB L3 cache. The A10 has a total L1 cache of 192 KB and a shared L2 cache of 4 MB, with no L3 cache present. This means the Intel chip relies on a three-level cache hierarchy, while the AMD chip uses only two levels, with a larger shared L2 pool.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Intel Celeron G5920 uses UHD 610, which is part of Intel's modern graphics architecture. The AMD A10-5800B integrates Radeon HD 7660D, a more powerful iGPU in its era but based on older technology. The A10's design as an APU emphasizes balanced CPU and GPU performance, whereas the Celeron's UHD 610 is more of a basic display output solution.

Memory architecture is another key difference. The Intel part supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the AMD part supports DDR3 with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the newer DDR4 standard provides higher bandwidth. PCIe support also differs: the Celeron offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the A10 offers Gen 2.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. Starting with cores and threads, the AMD A10-5800B has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Celeron G5920 has 2 cores and 2 threads. The base clock speeds are close: the Celeron runs at 3.50 GHz, while the A10 runs at 3.80 GHz. However, the A10 also has a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, while the Celeron has no boost clock listed.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The Intel Celeron G5920 has a TDP of 58 watts, while the AMD A10-5800B has a TDP of 100 watts. This makes the Celeron significantly more power-efficient on paper, a direct result of its newer 14 nm process versus the A10's 32 nm process.

The sockets are incompatible: the Celeron uses Intel Socket 1200, while the A10 uses AMD Socket FM2. The memory support differs as noted: DDR4 for Intel versus DDR3 for AMD. The PCIe generation also differs: Gen 3 for Intel versus Gen 2 for AMD.

Production status marks a clear divide. The Intel Celeron G5920 is listed as "Active," while the AMD A10-5800B is "End-of-life." Release dates are far apart: 2020-04-29 for the Celeron versus 2012-10-01 for the A10. The part numbers also differ: SRH42 for Intel, AD580BWOA44HJ for AMD.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both have an ECC memory support of false. The Intel Celeron's market segment is Desktop, as is the AMD A10's.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD A10-5800B wins on raw multi-threaded throughput potential due to its 4 cores versus 2. This is reflected in its higher average benchmark score of 794 versus 775. The A10 also has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 3.50 GHz) and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, which the Celeron lacks entirely. For workloads that scale with core count and clock speed, such as video encoding or multitasking, the A10 holds an advantage.

The A10 also wins on integrated graphics performance. Its Radeon HD 7660D is a more capable iGPU than Intel's UHD 610, making it better suited for light gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks without a discrete card. This is a notable advantage for budget desktop builds where a separate GPU is not planned.

The Intel Celeron G5920 wins on architectural efficiency and platform modernity. Its 14 nm process node, DDR4 memory support, and higher memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s versus 29.9 GB/s give it a clear edge in memory-intensive tasks. The Celeron also has a much lower TDP of 58 watts versus 100 watts, making it easier to cool and cheaper to run over time.

The Celeron's single-core performance appears stronger based on the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 318, which suggests better per-thread performance. This benefits older software, lightly threaded applications, and everyday tasks like web browsing or office work where single-core speed matters most.

The Verdict

The data presents two very different processors for different use cases. The AMD A10-5800B, despite being end-of-life and built on older 32 nm technology, offers more cores, higher clocks, and a stronger integrated GPU. Its average benchmark score of 794 is higher than the Celeron's 775, and it sits at the same 21st percentile. For users running multi-threaded applications or needing capable integrated graphics without a discrete GPU, the A10 is the better choice based on the recorded benchmarks.

The Intel Celeron G5920 is the newer part, released in 2020 versus 2012, and is still in active production. It offers a modern platform with DDR4 support, higher memory bandwidth, and a much lower TDP of 58 watts. Its single-core performance in Cinebench R23 (318) indicates a strong per-thread capability, which is valuable for everyday tasks. The Celeron also benefits from PCIe Gen 3 support, which allows for faster connectivity with modern storage and expansion cards.

Users who prioritize power efficiency, modern platform features, and single-threaded performance should choose the Intel Celeron G5920. Users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, higher clock speeds, or better integrated graphics from the database's perspective should choose the AMD A10-5800B. Both processors sit at the same 21st percentile, meaning they are both entry-level performers, but they excel in different areas. The A10's higher average score of 794 gives it a slight edge in overall raw performance, while the Celeron's newer architecture offers a more efficient and modern computing experience.