Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a capable, if not top-tier, experience in Fivem, ranking 2980th out of 3707 tested combos. This places the pairing in the lower-middle tier of the database, indicating that while it can handle the game, there is significant headroom above it in terms of raw performance. The data shows a system that is fundamentally sound for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2980 out of 3707 combos (approximately the 80th percentile) is a sobering statistic. It suggests that in the broader ecosystem of tested hardware pairings, this specific CPU-GPU combination is not near the top. This is not a verdict on its playability, but rather a measure of its standing. The data indicates that a significant portion of other tested systems outperform it, likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs that can push higher frame rates in Fivem's multiplayer environments.

This ranking is a direct consequence of the individual components' positions. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for multi-threaded workloads. The GPU, Intel Arc B570, however, is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU is the limiting factor in this pair, pulling the combined rank down from what the CPU alone might suggest. The data implies that the system is well-balanced for its intended use, but it is not a high-end combination; it is a practical, mid-range pairing that prioritizes a strong processor foundation.

The implicit message from the rank is that the experience will be defined more by the GPU's capabilities than the CPU's. For a game like Fivem, which is often heavily CPU-dependent in busy multiplayer servers, this combination might actually be more favorable than the raw GPU percentile suggests. The rank, however, does not account for such game-specific nuances; it is a general measure of the hardware pairing's overall performance profile.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in which component dominates performance as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system's performance is robust, with the Ultra preset achieving 67 FPS. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU, and the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as frame rates scale directly with the graphical load. The jump from Low (136 FPS) to Ultra (67 FPS) is a 69 FPS difference, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's load increases, and the CPU's role diminishes. The Medium preset still manages 71 FPS, but the Ultra preset drops to 44 FPS. The data shows a more pronounced performance hit when moving from Medium to Ultra at this resolution, suggesting that the GPU is nearing its limits. The CPU is still capable, but its performance headroom is less relevant as the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. No preset achieves 60 FPS, with the Low preset only reaching 50 FPS and Ultra falling to 24 FPS. The CPU's power is effectively irrelevant at this resolution because the Arc B570 cannot render the frames fast enough. The scaling between 1440p Medium (71 FPS) and 4K Medium (39 FPS) shows a 32 FPS drop, a substantial decline that points directly at the GPU's bandwidth and compute limitations at higher pixel counts.

The data indicates that for this game, the CPU is more than sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The GPU is the deciding factor for achieving higher frame rates and higher presets. In Fivem, where CPU load can be high due to many players and scripts, the Ryzen 7 9700F's 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 architecture provides a solid foundation, but the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are what determine the final output.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1920x1080 with all settings maximized?

A: Yes. The data shows that at 1080p, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset is also playable at 86 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Fivem?

A: The best experience is at 1920x1080, where all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable. At 2560x1440, only the Low and Medium presets remain playable, with Medium being the best visual option at 71 FPS.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F or the Intel Arc B570 more important for performance?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. While the CPU is in the 94th percentile, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking means it limits performance more significantly, especially at 1440p and 4K.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750?

A: The benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Arc B570 has an average score of 20556, while the Arc A750 is at 20582. The delta is a mere -0.1%, meaning they are statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: Does the CPU's performance headroom matter for Fivem?

A: Yes, but only up to a point. At 1080p, the CPU is likely sufficient to keep up with the GPU. However, at 4K, the GPU is so constrained that the CPU's extra headroom does not translate into higher frame rates, as seen by the 4K Ultra preset dropping to 24 FPS.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 24 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset. The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 33 FPS at 1440p with the Medium preset.

The Verdict

The data provides a clear verdict: this PC can run Fivem, but the playable experience is resolution-dependent. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all presets clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings here are Ultra, yielding an average of 67 FPS. This is a definitive "yes" for 1080p gaming.

For 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but with fewer options. The verdict shows that the Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the best at 71 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls to 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and not recommended for a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS on any preset. The best effort is the Low preset at 50 FPS, which is still below the playable threshold. Therefore, 4K gaming is not a viable option for this combination in Fivem. The verdict is that this is a solid 1080p and a good 1440p machine, but not a 4K machine.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875) is 0.2% slower, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF (avg score 70163) is 0.2% faster. These are effectively equivalent in processing power. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515) and Intel Core i7-14700K (69355) are also within 0.9% of the 9700F's score, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver a nearly identical experience in Fivem.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A750 (avg score 20582) is a near-perfect match, being 0.1% faster than the Arc B570. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) is 0.1% slower, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662) is 0.5% faster. These GPUs would all produce very similar frame rates in Fivem, making them suitable alternatives when considering a comparable build.

The data suggests that a system with any of these rival CPUs paired with any of these rival GPUs would land in the same performance tier. The differences are so marginal that they would not be perceptible in gameplay. This reinforces the idea that the combo's performance is defined by the GPU's class, and the CPU is not a differentiator at this level.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured data identifies the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding playable option, achieving an average of 67 FPS. This is the best visual quality you can get while staying above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the most demanding playable option, with an average of 71 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual fidelity and performance.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The highest average FPS is 50 on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Therefore, no settings are recommended for 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is the complete breakdown of measured frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B570 in Fivem.

3840x2160

  • Low: Average FPS 50.
  • Medium: Average FPS 39, Minimum FPS 33, Maximum FPS 45.
  • High: Average FPS 31.
  • Ultra: Average FPS 24.

2560x1440

  • Low: Average FPS 89.
  • Medium: Average FPS 71, Minimum FPS 60, Maximum FPS 81.
  • High: Average FPS 56.
  • Ultra: Average FPS 44.

1920x1080

  • Low: Average FPS 136.
  • Medium: Average FPS 107, Minimum FPS 91, Maximum FPS 123.
  • High: Average FPS 86.
  • Ultra: Average FPS 67.

The data shows a predictable pattern of decreasing performance with higher resolutions and more demanding presets. The minimum FPS figures for Medium presets indicate that the system can hold above the playable threshold in most cases, though the 4K Medium preset dips to 33 FPS, reinforcing that 4K is not a viable option.