SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a modern, mid-range desktop configuration built around AMD’s Zen 5 architecture and Intel’s Battlemage GPU generation. The processor delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance with an average benchmark score of 69,996, placing it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card offers solid 1080p and 1440p gaming capabilities with a 65th percentile standing. This combination targets users who need strong CPU horsepower for productivity and respectable GPU performance for gaming, though the data reveals a significant imbalance where the processor far outpaces the graphics card in raw capability.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996 on average, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515). It trails the Intel Core i7-14700KF by just 0.2% (70,163) and beats the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.9% (69,355).

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Arc B570 GPU?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20,582 (0.1% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.1% lower).

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured FPS data shows 4K performance is generally below playable thresholds. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 138 FPS. Only lighter titles like Valorant (207 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (119 FPS) achieve high frame rates at 3840x2160.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 80, and its average FPS across all tested games is 87.1 at 1080p. It ranks 3012th out of 3732 pairs tested, meaning roughly 19% of tested configurations deliver higher average frame rates.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc B570 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, which aligns with the GPU’s 150 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 9700F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU like the Arc B570 is mandatory for display output.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, delivering 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The GPU operates at a fixed 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing hardware includes 18 dedicated RT cores, though the benchmark data shows mixed results in RT-heavy titles. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory pool with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 160-bit bus limits performance at higher resolutions. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and GPU compute score of 7,281 place it in the mid-range segment, while Geekbench scores of 83,514 (OpenCL) and 96,844 (Vulkan) indicate strong compute capability for its class.

In real-world gaming, the Arc B570 demonstrates its strengths in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 133 FPS at 1080p, Valorant hits 304 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 293 FPS. However, demanding AAA games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 19 FPS at 1080p. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 confirms this positioning, showing the GPU is competitive with the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% difference) and Arc A750 (0.1% difference) but not designed for ultra-high refresh rates in modern titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 4691 single-thread score and 36,470 multi-thread score ensure no bottleneck in esports, where the GPU delivers 133 FPS in CS2, 304 FPS in Valorant, and 293 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p. At 1440p, these drop to 88, 259, and 201 FPS respectively, still well above 144 Hz monitors. However, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS) at 1080p fall short of high-refresh targets.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with a 94th percentile CPU standing provides ample headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth multitasking, and the GPU’s 65th percentile position means game capture at 1080p is feasible. The measured 87.1 average FPS across games suggests streamers should stick to 1080p for consistent quality.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 77,955 and integer math score of 120,788 indicate strong compute for rendering and effects. The GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 performance and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline playback and exports. The 10 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines, though the 160-bit bus may slow large multi-layer projects.

3D rendering: The 36,470 multi-thread score places this CPU near the Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% higher) and Core i7-14700K (0.9% higher), making it a capable renderer. The GPU’s 7,281 compute score supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 is modest. Data compression score of 421,988 and encryption score of 21,488 further confirm strong CPU-side performance.

Software development: With 8 cores and 16 threads, the CPU handles compilation and virtualization well. The 94th percentile ranking means it outperforms the Ryzen 9 7940HX and 7950X in average score. Memory support for DDR5 with ECC capability adds reliability for long build processes. The GPU is less critical here, but its Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support covers modern graphics APIs.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 ensures snappy application response. The GPU’s 661 PassMark G2D score handles 2D workloads easily. For office tasks and browsing, this build is overkill, but the 94th percentile CPU ensures years of relevant performance. The 450 W suggested PSU keeps system costs and noise low.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700F uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, providing headroom for future high-bandwidth storage and GPUs. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, leaving significant thermal and power headroom within the 450 W PSU recommendation for more power-hungry components.

The Arc B570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for current games but may bottleneck future GPUs that require x16 bandwidth. The 450 W PSU supports a GPU upgrade to models with higher TDP, though the 1x 8-pin connector limits options to cards requiring a single connector. The AM5 socket ensures processor upgrades are possible within the same platform, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract more performance from the 3.80 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost clocks.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU’s 94th percentile performance outpaces the GPU’s 65th percentile. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs won’t be bandwidth-limited by the motherboard. Memory upgrades are also viable, as the dual-channel DDR5 controller can scale with faster kits. The 4 nm process and 8,315 million transistors indicate the CPU is a modern design with longevity.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge codename) using TSMC’s 4 nm process. It features 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache, totaling a die size of 70.6 mm² with 8,315 million transistors. Base clock is 3.80 GHz with a 5.50 GHz boost, and the 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient for this performance level.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded capabilities: the PassMark multi-thread score of 36,470 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 69,996. This edges out the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.7% and matches the Core i7-14700K within 0.9%. Single-thread performance is equally strong at 4,691, which is critical for gaming and daily responsiveness. The extended instructions score of 33,688 and prime number finding score of 183 indicate strong AVX-512 and integer workloads.

The CPU excels in data-intensive tasks, scoring 421,988 in data compression and 21,488 in encryption. Floating-point math at 77,955 and integer math at 120,788 show balanced compute. Physics score of 2,122 and random string sorting at 45,890 round out the profile. These numbers suggest the 9700F is a top-tier productivity CPU that rivals much higher-priced processors, making it the dominant component in this build. The 94th percentile ranking means it outperforms 94% of all CPUs tested, a remarkable position for a 65 W part.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This build delivers excellent esports performance, with Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and CS2 at 133 FPS. For AAA titles, expect 39 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 36 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, which is playable but not ideal. The 87.1 average FPS across all games suggests most titles run well at 1080p.

Content creators: The CPU’s 94th percentile performance makes this a strong choice for video editing and 3D rendering. The multi-thread score of 36,470 rivals the Ryzen 9 7950X, and the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates effects. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p projects.

Software developers: With 16 threads and strong single-thread performance (4,691), this build handles compilation, testing, and virtualization. The ECC memory support and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth add reliability. The GPU’s compute score of 7,281 supports GPU-accelerated development tasks.

Students and professionals: The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP keep power costs low, and the 450 W PSU is efficient. The CPU’s 94th percentile ensures longevity for demanding software. The GPU handles general-purpose tasks and light gaming without issue.

Small business workstations: The combination of high CPU performance and moderate GPU capability suits data analysis, financial modeling, and office productivity. The 65th percentile GPU is adequate for business applications, while the 94th percentile CPU handles heavy spreadsheets and databases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69,996, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This is 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875) and 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515), while trailing the Core i7-14700KF by 0.2% (70,163) and beating the Core i7-14700K by 0.9% (69,355). The multi-thread score of 36,470 and single-thread score of 4,691 are both strong, with the latter being critical for gaming.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile. This is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) and 0.4% ahead of the Quadro M4000M (20,480), but 0.1% behind the Arc A750 (20,582) and 0.5% behind the Radeon R9 M390X (20,662). The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 and PassMark G3D of 14,195 confirm mid-range positioning.

Measured gaming performance shows an average of 87.1 FPS across all games at 1080p. The best results are in Valorant (304 FPS) and CS:GO (293 FPS), while the worst are in Ark: Survival Ascended (19 FPS) and The Medium (28 FPS). At 1440p, the average drops to around 55-60 FPS for many titles, with CS2 at 88 FPS and Warzone at 163 FPS. The combined percentile of 80 indicates this build outperforms 80% of all tested configurations, though the pair rank of 3012 out of 3732 shows it’s not in the top tier.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) 8-core, 16-thread processor on AM5, while the GPU is a Battlemage (Arc 5) Xe2-HPG chip with 10 GB GDDR6. The combined percentile of 80 places this in the upper-mid range of all builds tested, with an average FPS of 87.1 across games.

The CPU is the standout component, with a 94th percentile ranking that rivals much more expensive processors. The GPU, at 65th percentile, is competent but clearly the weaker link. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compilation, and simulation, while providing solid 1080p gaming performance. The 450 W PSU recommendation and 65 W CPU TDP make this an efficient build.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $289, and the GPU is $219 USD. The 4 nm CPU and 5 nm GPU processes are modern, and both are production active. The system supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 (CPU) and Gen 4 (GPU), and has a dual-slot GPU with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU’s 94th percentile vastly exceeds the GPU’s 65th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render, as seen in Valorant (304 FPS) where the CPU’s single-thread strength shines. At 1440p, the gap narrows, but the GPU still limits performance in demanding titles.

The bottleneck shifts by workload. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (421,988 score) and encryption (21,488), the processor operates at full capacity. In GPU-bound tasks like 3DMark Steel Nomad (2,649) and PassMark G3D (14,195), the graphics card determines performance. For gaming, the bottleneck is almost always the GPU, as evidenced by the FPS scaling: Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 39 FPS at 1080p to 29 at 1440p and 19 at 4K, showing GPU limitations rather than CPU.

The measured FPS data confirms this. Games like CS2 (133 FPS at 1080p) and Warzone (183 FPS) benefit from the CPU’s strength, but AAA titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (36 FPS) and Ark (19 FPS) are GPU-bound. The pair rank of 3012 out of 3732 indicates that many builds with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs achieve higher average FPS. For a balanced upgrade, the GPU should be replaced first, as the CPU has headroom for a significantly more powerful graphics card within the 450 W PSU budget.