SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

40,518 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Arc A770M form a laptop-class pairing that sits at the 75th combined percentile of all benchmarked builds, placing it comfortably in the upper-midrange tier of mobile systems. The CPU, a 16-core Panther Lake part from Intel's Core Ultra Series 3, posts an average benchmark score of 40,518 and ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A770M GPU, built on the Xe-HPG architecture, lands in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 18,383. This combination of a top-tier processor and a mid-pack graphics card creates a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks but is more measured in pure graphics throughput, and the following analysis details exactly where each component shines and where the pairing may leave performance on the table.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, which is a substantial single-core headroom for a mobile part with a 25 W TDP. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s, and it connects to the rest of the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps feed the 16 cores in multithreaded workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28,221 points in the multicore test and 3,984 points in single-core, while the older Cinebench R20 run yields 11,852 multicore and 1,673 single-core points. The Cinebench R15 scores are 2,844 multicore and 401 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that scales well across all cores, with the multicore scores being roughly seven times the single-core figures, which is expected for a 16-thread part. The PassMark suite reinforces this: the multithread score is 32,956, with integer math at 88,083 and floating-point math at 105,681, while the single-thread score is 4,005. The data compression score of 312,927 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in archiving and file-handling tasks, and the encryption score of 25,228 shows capable security workload throughput.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra X7 368H is effectively tied with several other high-end mobile parts. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core 7 253PE (which scores 40,557), 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 223PE (40,585), and 0.2% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40,431) and the Intel Xeon 6507P (40,426). This means the 368H is not a standout leader in raw CPU throughput, but it is firmly within a tight cluster of top-tier mobile processors, and any differences in real-world performance would be negligible. The 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a high-end processor, and the average benchmark score of 40,518 places it in the same league as desktop-class parts from a few years ago.

For real workloads, the 16 cores without hyperthreading (16 threads) mean that the CPU relies on physical cores rather than SMT, which can be beneficial for power efficiency and thermal management in a laptop chassis. The high boost clock of 5.00 GHz is notable for single-threaded responsiveness, and the 18 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks like compiling code or running large spreadsheets. The 3 nm process node and 25 W TDP suggest that this is a power-efficient part, which is crucial for sustained performance in a thin-and-light form factor, and the integrated Arc B390 graphics provide a fallback for light graphics work when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by a stark contrast between the processor and graphics card. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,518 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 18,383 places it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 75, which reflects the CPU's dominance pulling the system upward despite the GPU being more modest.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks specifically, the Arc A770M scores 2,278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 89,494 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 74,422 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 11,774, a G2D score of 711, and a GPU compute score of 4,778. The DirectX tests within PassMark are notably low: 178 in DX9, 56 in DX10, 69 in DX11, and 70 in DX12, which suggests that the card's raw rasterization performance in legacy APIs is not its strong suit, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 is a more modern indicator of DX12 gaming capability.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context: it is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18,373), 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro D500 (18,533), 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18,189), and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18,159). These deltas are tiny, meaning the Arc A770M performs nearly identically to a desktop RX 460 and a mobile RTX 3060 in average benchmark terms. However, the RTX 3060 Mobile is a well-known 1080p gaming GPU, so the Arc A770M should be expected to deliver similar frame rates in many titles, though driver maturity and API support may vary.

The combined picture is a system that will crush CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, but will be held back in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or heavy graphics workloads. The CPU is in the top 13% of all processors, while the GPU is only in the top 38%, so the balance is skewed toward compute rather than graphics. For a laptop, this could be an ideal configuration for a developer or content creator who needs fast compile times and smooth multitasking, but it is not a dedicated gaming rig.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile means that in any task that relies heavily on the GPU, the Arc A770M will be the bottleneck, capping performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support. This is evident in the PassMark scores: the CPU's multithread score of 32,956 is over 2.8 times the GPU's G3D score of 11,774, which is an unusual imbalance for a laptop pairing.

In gaming, the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 69 and DirectX 12 score of 70 in PassMark are low, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 suggests that modern DX12 titles can still run, albeit not at high settings or high resolutions. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,005 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,984 ensure that it will never be the bottleneck in frame generation, meaning that any FPS limitations in games will come directly from the GPU's rendering throughput. For CPU-bound tasks like physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 2,857 is strong, and the data compression score of 312,927 shows that the CPU can handle heavy data manipulation without breaking a sweat.

The memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s from the LPDDR5X dual-channel setup is shared between the CPU and the discrete GPU (which has its own 16 GB of GDDR6 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth), so there is no system memory contention for graphics. However, the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 lanes could limit data transfer to the GPU if the GPU were more powerful, but at this GPU tier, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the Arc A770M is sufficient. Overall, the bottleneck is squarely on the GPU for any graphics workload, and the CPU will sit idle waiting for frames in most games, while in productivity tasks the CPU will run at full tilt and the GPU will be underutilized.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE?

A: The Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40,518, which is 0.1% lower than the Core 7 253PE's score of 40,557. This means the two processors perform virtually identically in average benchmark terms, with the 368H being slightly behind but within the margin of error.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does that mean for gaming?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18,383. This places it in the upper-midrange tier, roughly equivalent to a mobile RTX 3060, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle with high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H does not support ECC memory. It supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, which is typical for mobile processors where ECC is not a requirement.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process node, while the GPU is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The CPU's process is more advanced, which contributes to its lower 25 W TDP, while the GPU has a 120 W TDP.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18,383, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile's score of 18,159. In average terms, they are nearly identical, though real-world game performance may differ due to drivers and optimizations.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and can it be upgraded?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a ball-grid array design, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. This is a mobile processor, so it is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; the entire laptop would need to be replaced for a CPU upgrade.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This is a large memory pool for a mobile GPU, which is beneficial for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is built on the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, so there is no CPU upgrade path without replacing the entire laptop. The system supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the current GPU and most peripherals. The GPU, an Intel Arc A770M, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has a 120 W TDP, but there is no suggested PSU rating in the data, which is typical for a laptop where power delivery is integrated.

For a sensible next upgrade, the primary lever is the GPU, since the CPU has significant headroom (87th percentile) compared to the GPU (62nd percentile). However, in a laptop, the GPU is also soldered and not upgradeable, so the only real upgrade path is to move to a different laptop platform. If the user were building a desktop equivalent, they would pair a CPU of this caliber with a much stronger GPU to balance the system, but within this mobile form factor, the user is limited by the integrated design. The memory is also fixed, so the user should ensure they have enough LPDDR5X capacity at purchase time. The lack of ECC support means this is not suited for mission-critical server workloads, but for a high-end mobile workstation, the 25 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable for a large laptop chassis, and the 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is future-proof for texture-heavy applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1650 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mobile GPU and exceeds what many desktop cards offer. The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, with a pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 524.8 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 16.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

In benchmark terms, the Arc A770M scores 2,278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), which is a modern test that stresses ray tracing and DX12 features, and it performs well in compute with 89,494 in Geekbench OpenCL and 74,422 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score of 11,774 is respectable, but the GPU compute score of 4,778 is lower than expected, suggesting that the card's compute throughput is not its strongest attribute relative to its rasterization capabilities. The DirectX 9 score of 178 is high, but the DX10, DX11, and DX12 scores are all below 70, which is unusual and may indicate driver overhead or architectural quirks in legacy API paths.

The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it future-proof for modern APIs. The 16 GB of VRAM is a standout feature, as it allows for large texture sets and high-resolution rendering without running out of memory, which is rare in the 62nd percentile tier. For rendering workloads like 3D modeling or video editing, the GPU's compute scores are moderate, but the high VRAM capacity means it can handle complex scenes that would exceed the memory limits of rivals with only 8 GB. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the memory does not become a bottleneck for the 4096 shading units, and the 2050 MHz boost clock is competitive for a mobile part.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is adequate for 1080p at medium settings, but the GPU's 62nd percentile and PassMark DX12 score of 70 indicate that it will not sustain high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,005 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, so users should expect around 60 FPS in esports titles and lower in AAA games.

Streaming is a mixed bag: the CPU's 16 cores and high multithread score of 32,956 can handle encoding without impacting game performance, but the GPU's modest compute score of 4,778 means hardware encoding via the Arc A770M may not be as efficient as dedicated streamer GPUs. The system can handle streaming at 1080p, but the GPU may struggle if the game is also demanding.

Video editing benefits greatly from the CPU's 87th percentile, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 28,221 and PassMark data compression of 312,927, which speed up rendering and export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for timeline previews and effects, but the GPU compute score of 4,778 limits heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering is CPU-bound in most engines, and the 16-core processor with a floating-point math score of 105,681 will handle Blender or similar workloads well. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but its compute performance is not top-tier, so final renders will rely mostly on the CPU.

Software development is a strong use case, with the CPU's integer math score of 88,083 and multithread score of 32,956 accelerating compilation and testing. The 18 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces build times.

Student and office work is overkill for this hardware, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,005 ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and browsers, while the GPU's 711 G2D score is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration. The 25 W CPU TDP also means long battery life for all-day use.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, a 16-core mobile processor from the Panther Lake generation, with the Intel Arc A770M, a 16 GB discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is laptop, and the combined percentile is 75, meaning this system outperforms 75% of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU is in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, which is exceptional, while the GPU is in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, which is solidly midrange. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,518 is 2.2 times the GPU's average score of 18,383, highlighting the imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is based on Intel's 3 nm process with a 25 W TDP, while the GPU is on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 120 W TDP, so the system is CPU-heavy in terms of compute capability but GPU-light in terms of graphics throughput. This is a workstation-oriented laptop configuration that prioritizes processing power over gaming performance, and it sits in the upper-midrange tier of mobile systems.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for content creators who work with large datasets, video editors who need fast export times, and software developers who compile code frequently, as the CPU's 87th percentile and high multithread scores will significantly reduce wait times. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A770M sufficient, but those seeking high-refresh or 1440p gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 62nd percentile and low DX12 scores will be the limiting factor. Students and office workers will benefit from the CPU's snappy single-thread performance and long battery life due to the 25 W TDP, though the discrete GPU adds weight and power draw. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive simulations or financial modeling will appreciate the 16 cores and 18 MB of L3 cache, and the 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU can handle large visualization tasks. However, this is not a build for gamers or GPU-accelerated rendering specialists, as the GPU's compute score of 4,778 and PassMark G3D of 11,774 place it well below the CPU's capabilities.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A770M's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 and its 62nd percentile ranking suggest it can handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at 1080p with high settings, likely achieving 100+ FPS due to the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 4,005 in PassMark. For AAA games at 1080p, the GPU's PassMark DX12 score of 70 and comparison to the RTX 3060 Mobile (1.2% difference in average score) indicate that medium settings would yield around 60 FPS in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed, but high settings would drop below 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM helps with textures, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute are insufficient for smooth high-refresh gaming, so users should expect 30-45 FPS at medium settings. The CPU will never be the bottleneck, as its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,984 ensures frame generation is not limited by the processor, but the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 69 suggests that older games may run worse than expected due to driver overhead. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming laptop at medium settings, not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming machine, and the estimates should be treated as rough guidelines given the lack of measured FPS data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds