SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

40,518 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the Intel Arc A730M presents a notably balanced mobile platform, though the data reveals distinct workload-specific constraints. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 40518, placing it at the 87th percentile among all processors, while the GPU scores 45592 on average, sitting at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 86 indicates that neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate performance, but the individual benchmark deltas tell a more nuanced story.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the processor demonstrates exceptional single-thread capability with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3984, which is a strong indicator of responsive gaming and lightly-threaded application performance. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 28221 shows that the 16-core configuration scales effectively, though the lack of hyper-threading — evidenced by 16 threads matching 16 cores — means heavily parallel workloads will not benefit from additional logical threads beyond the physical core count. This creates a potential bottleneck for workloads that rely on thread oversubscription, such as certain video encoding tasks or virtual machine hosting.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 places it in a competitive position against its nearest rivals. It trails the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 0.8 percent and the RTX A2000 by 1 percent, while leading the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT by 0.5 percent and the RTX 5090 Mobile by 1 percent. These narrow margins suggest that the Arc A730M delivers consistent performance around a well-established baseline, but it does not decisively outperform any of its direct competitors. The relative parity means that frame pacing and driver efficiency will likely determine real-world outcomes more than raw compute capability.

In gaming workloads, the balance tilts toward the CPU in most scenarios. The 87th percentile CPU ranking combined with the 84th percentile GPU ranking indicates the CPU has slightly more headroom relative to its peer group, which could prevent GPU bottlenecking in CPU-light titles. Conversely, in GPU-intensive scenarios such as 4K gaming or ray tracing, the Arc A730M's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 24 ray tracing cores will become the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-thread advantage cannot compensate for insufficient graphics throughput.

The memory subsystem reveals another potential constraint. The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU accesses its own 12 GB GDDR6 memory at 336.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. This separation means the CPU and GPU do not contend for the same memory bandwidth, which is advantageous for multitasking scenarios. However, the CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while generous for a mobile part, may prove insufficient for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, potentially causing the CPU to stall while waiting on memory operations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded independently of the motherboard. This is a non-negotiable constraint for laptop builders — the processor is permanently affixed, and any future CPU upgrade requires a complete system replacement. The production status of the CPU is listed as active, indicating ongoing availability, but the platform itself does not offer socket-level flexibility.

Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth. LPDDR5X is soldered onto the motherboard in most mobile designs, which means memory capacity and speed are fixed at the time of purchase. Users who anticipate needing more than the factory-installed memory should plan accordingly, as there is no upgrade path for system RAM. ECC memory is not supported, which excludes this platform from error-correcting workstation workloads that demand data integrity guarantees.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 4 lanes allocated to the CPU. This is a modest allocation for a mobile processor, but it is sufficient for connecting a high-speed NVMe SSD or a discrete GPU. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for graphics data transfer. However, the CPU's limited 4-lane Gen 5 allocation means that any additional expansion devices, such as capture cards or secondary storage controllers, will compete for available lanes, potentially creating bandwidth contention.

The CPU's thermal design power is 25 watts, while the GPU is rated at 80 watts, giving a combined TDP of 105 watts for the core compute components. No suggested PSU is provided in the data, and since this is a laptop platform, power delivery is handled by the system's internal power supply and battery. The relatively modest TDP figures suggest that a well-designed cooling solution should manage thermals without excessive throttling, but the absence of PSU guidance means users should verify that the laptop's power adapter can sustain peak loads during simultaneous CPU and GPU stress.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform does not exist in the traditional sense, given the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU. The only viable upgrade path is to the system as a whole — replacing the laptop with a newer model that offers a more powerful processor or graphics solution. For users who require additional storage or connectivity, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate a fast NVMe drive, and the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with external GPU enclosures if the laptop supports Thunderbolt or equivalent connectivity.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Panther Lake architecture at a 3 nm process node. The absence of hyper-threading is a significant architectural decision — with threads equal to cores, the processor relies entirely on physical cores for parallelism, which simplifies scheduling but forfeits the performance boost that simultaneous multithreading can provide in certain workloads. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is conservative, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz represents a substantial 2.5x frequency increase, indicating strong single-thread burst capability.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The per-core L2 allocation is generous, which should reduce latency for frequently accessed data and improve single-thread performance. The 18 MB L3 cache is shared across all 16 cores, providing a moderate pool for inter-core communication and shared data structures. The 3 nm process node, manufactured by Intel's foundry, contributes to the 25-watt TDP, which is remarkably low for a 16-core processor and speaks to the efficiency of the Panther Lake architecture.

Benchmark results demonstrate strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2844 and single-core score of 401 show a 7.1x scaling factor from single to multi-core, which is below the theoretical 16x maximum but realistic given thermal constraints and memory bandwidth limitations. The Cinebench R20 scores of 11852 multi-core and 1673 single-core represent a 7.1x scaling ratio, while the R23 scores of 28221 multi-core and 3984 single-core show a 7.1x ratio as well. This consistent scaling pattern suggests that the processor's multi-core performance is limited by factors other than core count, likely memory bandwidth or power delivery.

PassMark results provide additional insight into workload-specific behavior. The data compression score of 312927 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in compression algorithms that benefit from the large L2 cache and high clock speeds. Data encryption scores 25228, while extended instructions score 25669, showing balanced performance in cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The floating-point math score of 105681 significantly exceeds the integer math score of 88083, suggesting the architecture favors floating-point operations, which is beneficial for scientific computing and 3D rendering. The find prime numbers score of 321 is comparatively low, reflecting the processor's relative weakness in integer-heavy, branch-intensive workloads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the CPU is tightly clustered. The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40557, just 0.1 percent higher, while the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585 at 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, 0.2 percent lower, and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40426, also 0.2 percent lower. This clustering within a 0.4 percent band indicates that the Ultra X7 368H delivers performance essentially equivalent to these competing processors, making architectural features and platform characteristics more important differentiators than raw benchmark scores.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the Arc A730M targets users who need a mobile workstation-class laptop with balanced CPU and GPU performance. Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p experiences will find the combination suitable, as the CPU's 87th percentile ranking ensures strong frame pacing while the GPU's 84th percentile provides adequate graphics throughput for modern titles at medium to high settings. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU offers headroom for texture-heavy games and future titles with increasing memory demands.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 indicates capable rendering performance, while the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352 and Vulkan score of 64693 demonstrate substantial compute throughput for GPU-accelerated effects and encoding. The 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports real-time previews and moderate rendering workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's balanced performance across integer and floating-point operations, as well as the robust data encryption score of 25228, which accelerates secure compilation and cryptographic operations. The 16 cores provide ample parallelism for build systems that support multi-threaded compilation, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded toolchains.

Students and small business users who require a capable laptop for productivity, research, and light creative work will find this platform well-suited. The efficient 25-watt CPU TDP contributes to longer battery life, while the combined 105-watt CPU and GPU TDP keeps thermal output manageable in a portable chassis. The integrated Arc B390 graphics in the CPU provides a fallback for power-saving modes, while the discrete Arc A730M handles demanding workloads when needed.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 40518, placing it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE, scores 40557, a 0.1 percent advantage, while the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585 at 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, 0.2 percent lower, and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40426, also 0.2 percent lower. This tight grouping indicates that the Ultra X7 368H performs essentially at parity with its closest competitors, with differences well within measurement noise.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 45592 places it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, scores 45384, which is 0.5 percent lower, while the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972, 0.8 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, 1 percent lower, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043, 1 percent higher. The GPU's performance relative to these rivals is characterized by narrow margins, with the largest delta being just 1 percent in either direction.

The combined percentile of 86 reflects the overall system capability, which is slightly lower than the CPU's individual 87th percentile but higher than the GPU's 84th percentile. This suggests that the platform as a whole performs at a level between its two primary components, with the CPU slightly boosting the overall tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 provides a modern gaming metric, while the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 70352 and 64693 respectively demonstrate strong compute performance for both general-purpose and graphics APIs.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and 5.00 GHz boost clock ensure that frame generation is not CPU-limited in most titles, while the GPU's 84th percentile provides sufficient throughput for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The 12 GB VRAM accommodates large texture sets without spillover to system memory.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221, supports simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The GPU's Vulkan score of 64693 indicates capable hardware encoding support, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores may limit AI-accelerated streaming features.

Video editing: The CPU's floating-point math score of 105681 and data compression score of 312927 benefit video codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering and color grading, while the 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution frame buffers.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11852 provides solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 3072 shading units and 192 texture mapping units deliver capable GPU-accelerated rendering. The 24 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible applications.

Software development: The CPU's balanced integer score of 88083 and floating-point score of 105681 serve compilation and testing workloads effectively. The data encryption score of 25228 accelerates secure build pipelines, and the 16 physical cores without hyper-threading provide predictable scheduling for parallel builds.

Student and office work: The 25-watt CPU TDP contributes to efficient operation, while the processor's single-thread score of 4005 in PassMark ensures responsive application launches and document editing. The integrated Arc B390 graphics provides a low-power display output option when discrete GPU performance is unnecessary.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H support hyper-threading?

A: No, the processor has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning each core handles exactly one thread without simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A730M have?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is rated at 25 watts and the GPU at 80 watts, giving a combined thermal design power of 105 watts.

Q: Is the CPU socket upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform that does not support processor replacement.

Q: What API support does the GPU provide?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H?

A: The Ultra X7 368H scores 40518 on average, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen 9 7940H's score of 40431.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H processor with the Intel Arc A730M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake architecture processor on a 3 nm process node, while the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm process node. The combined percentile of 86 places this system in the upper tier of overall performance, with the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile among their respective categories.

The system is designed for mobile use, with the CPU's 25-watt TDP and the GPU's 80-watt TDP enabling a portable form factor while delivering substantial compute capability. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 2050 MHz boost clock provide strong peak performance, while the 12 GB GDDR6 VRAM ensures adequate graphics memory for modern workloads. The pairing represents a balanced mobile platform that performs near parity with its closest rivals across both CPU and GPU benchmarks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so the following discussion is framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and the GPU's 84th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be competitive with systems in a similar performance tier, but exact frame rates cannot be stated without measured data.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 indicates modern DirectX 12 gaming capability, while the 12 GB VRAM provides ample memory for high-resolution textures. The CPU's single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 3984 supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the multi-core score of 28221 ensures smooth performance in games that utilize multiple threads. Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 45592 and its position relative to rivals like the RTX 5090 Mobile and RTX A2000, users can expect frame rates roughly in line with those competing GPUs, though specific game and resolution combinations will vary.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across 406 mm², giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1100 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration provides substantial capacity for modern games and compute workloads, though the bandwidth is moderate compared to higher-end mobile GPUs. The 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units drive a pixel rate of 196.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.6 GTexel/s. The 24 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1) provide strong compute performance.

The GPU's benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 64693. These scores place the GPU at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 45592. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384 (0.5 percent lower), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972 (0.8 percent higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45152 (1 percent lower), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46043 (1 percent higher). The production status is listed as end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support and availability. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs and features.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds