SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

40,518 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a high-midrange mobile platform built around Intel’s latest Panther Lake architecture. With a combined percentile ranking of 88, this laptop configuration sits comfortably above the vast majority of currently benchmarked systems, though the data for this exact combination is based on synthetic benchmarks and component-level analysis rather than direct game testing. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific pairing, so all gaming performance expectations must be framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel’s 3 nm process node, part of the Panther Lake-H generation within the Core Ultra Series 3. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of just 25 watts — a remarkably efficient envelope for the performance class it occupies. The architecture is Panther Lake, a design that emphasizes power efficiency alongside sustained multi-threaded throughput, which is clearly reflected in the benchmark data.

In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 28,221 points in multi-core and 3,984 points in single-core. The multi-core score places it within striking distance of desktop-class processors from a few generations ago, while the single-core score indicates excellent per-thread performance for latency-sensitive tasks. The R20 results (11,852 multi-core, 1,673 single-core) and R15 results (2,844 multi-core, 401 single-core) follow the same pattern, showing consistent scaling across different rendering workloads.

The PassMark suite provides deeper insight into workload-specific behavior. The multi-thread score of 32,956 is strong, but the individual sub-tests reveal the CPU’s character. Integer math scores 88,083, while floating-point math reaches 105,681 — a notable gap that suggests the Panther Lake architecture handles FP-heavy workloads particularly well, which benefits scientific computing and certain content creation tasks. Data compression scores 312,927, indicating strong throughput for archiving and file management. Data encryption at 25,228 and extended instructions at 25,669 show solid but not exceptional cryptography performance. The find prime numbers test scores just 321, which is relatively weak, suggesting the architecture does not excel at purely integer-heavy algorithmic loops.

The avgBenchmarkScore for the CPU is 40,518, with a percentile rank of 87 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40,557 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40,585 (0.2% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431 (0.2% slower), and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40,426 (0.2% slower). This places the Ultra X7 368H in an extremely competitive band where performance differences between leading mobile processors are within measurement noise. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 2.5 MB per-core L2 cache provide adequate data locality for most workloads, while the dual-channel LPDDR5X memory bus delivers 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a ball-grid-array package soldered directly to the motherboard. This means the CPU itself is not upgradeable in any practical sense; users cannot swap it for a newer or higher-tier processor. The platform is designed around integrated mobility, and the upgrade path is therefore limited to other components that are user-accessible in a laptop chassis.

Memory support is LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus, delivering 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth. This is soldered memory in most implementations, so RAM upgrades are typically not possible either. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), which offers high-bandwidth connectivity for a single primary device — likely an NVMe SSD or a discrete GPU. The integrated graphics solution is the Arc B390, which handles display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is not engaged.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A570M, has a TDP of 75 W and a suggested PSU rating that is not specified in the data. Given the 25 W CPU TDP, the total platform power draw is modest by gaming laptop standards, which means the existing power delivery system should have ample headroom for the combined load. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is more than sufficient for its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

For users considering a sensible next upgrade, the locked socket and soldered memory mean the platform itself is a closed system. The most practical upgrades would be storage-related, leveraging the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for a high-speed NVMe drive, or external peripherals. The 25 W CPU TDP suggests this laptop is designed for thin-and-light form factors where cooling and battery life take precedence over raw expansion capability.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Arc A570M combination. There are no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows available, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components. The data should be interpreted as indicative of relative capability rather than absolute frame rates.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, which is a strong result for a mobile part. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, 0.3% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, 0.3% slower), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, 0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, 0.7% faster). This clustering indicates the Arc A570M performs at a level comparable to desktop GPUs from several generations ago, which bodes well for 1080p gaming at high settings.

The CPU’s single-core score of 4,005 in PassMark and 3,984 in Cinebench R23 suggest it can feed the GPU effectively in most gaming scenarios. For esports titles and lighter games, the combination should deliver very high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 Hz in many cases. For AAA games at ultra settings, the estimated performance would be playable at 1080p, with frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range depending on the title’s optimization. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would become limiting factors for texture-heavy games, and the estimated frame rates would drop to 40-60 FPS at ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for ultra settings, and users would need to reduce settings to medium or lower for playable frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and the Intel Arc A570M is well-matched for most workloads, but the data reveals where each component takes the lead. The CPU’s percentile rank of 87 and the GPU’s percentile rank of 88 are nearly identical, suggesting neither component dramatically outclasses the other in overall capability.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 2,857 indicates strong performance that would not bottleneck the GPU in gaming. The multi-thread score of 32,956 ensures that background tasks, streaming, and game logic all run smoothly without stealing cycles from the rendering pipeline. The single-thread score of 4,005 is particularly important for games that rely heavily on a single primary thread, and this result suggests minimal bottlenecking even in poorly optimized titles.

In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A570M’s 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs provide solid rasterization throughput. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1080p gaming at high settings. However, the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the most likely bottleneck at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for current titles but may become tight with future releases.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, suggests that at 1080p the CPU and GPU are well-balanced, with neither consistently holding the other back. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, and the CPU would have significant headroom to spare. Conversely, in lightly-threaded CPU tasks like data encryption (25,228 score), the GPU would be idle and the CPU’s single-thread performance would determine overall system responsiveness.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, placing this laptop configuration above 88% of all benchmarked systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40,518, which is 0.1% lower than the Core 7 253PE’s score of 40,557.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU uses a ball-grid-array (BGA) socket, so overclocking and user-level replacement are not supported.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The Intel Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and solid GPU acceleration in a mobile form factor. The 16-core processor with a 25 W TDP makes it ideal for professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads on the go, such as software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts processing large datasets, or engineers running simulations. The PassMark integer and floating-point scores of 88,083 and 105,681 indicate strong performance for these tasks.

Gamers playing at 1080p will find this configuration well-suited for high-refresh-rate play in esports titles, with estimated frame rates well above 100 FPS. For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the estimated performance is playable, and the 88th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can handle most current titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,221 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239, which together enable reasonable render times for short-form content.

Students and office workers in technical fields will appreciate the balance of performance and efficiency, with the 25 W CPU TDP enabling longer battery life than higher-power alternatives. The combination is less suitable for users who demand 1440p or 4K gaming at ultra settings, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would become limiting factors. Small business workstations that need to handle occasional rendering, video conferencing, and productivity suites would be well-served by this pairing, provided the workload does not require extreme GPU compute.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H achieves an average benchmark score of 40,518, ranking at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest competitors are remarkably close: the Intel Core 7 253PE leads by 0.1%, the Intel Core 5 223PE leads by 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Xeon 6507P trail by 0.2% each. This places the CPU in a dead heat with several strong mobile and entry-level server parts, which speaks to the efficiency of the Panther Lake architecture at just 25 W TDP.

The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, ranking at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which is 0.3% slower. The NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon PRO V710 are 0.5% and 0.7% faster, respectively. This clustering shows that the Arc A570M delivers compute performance comparable to desktop GPUs from several generations back, which is impressive for a 75 W mobile part.

The combined picture is one of balanced performance: both components rank in the high 80s percentile, within a few percentage points of their nearest rivals, and the combined percentile of 88 reflects a system that is well-above average without being flagship-tier. The CPU’s strength in floating-point math and multi-threaded workloads complements the GPU’s solid compute capabilities, making this a versatile platform for both productivity and gaming.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H as the primary processor and the Intel Arc A570M as the discrete graphics solution. The CPU is part of Intel’s Core Ultra Series 3, built on Panther Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node, while the GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The build class is explicitly laptop, meaning all components are designed for mobile power and thermal envelopes.

The overall tier of this pairing is high-midrange to near-premium, based on the 88th combined percentile. The CPU’s 87th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile both indicate strong, but not top-tier, performance. The 25 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that can maintain sustained performance without excessive heat or fan noise, making it suitable for prolonged workloads. The GPU’s 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die highlight the density of the DG2-256 chip, which delivers substantial compute in a compact package.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-256 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. The die contains 11,500 million transistors across 269 mm², yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This modest clock speed range is typical for a mobile part prioritizing thermal efficiency over raw frequency.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a balanced configuration for 1080p gaming, though it may feel constrained at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, providing a solid foundation for rasterization. It also includes 16 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests RT performance will be modest. The FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) provides headroom for workloads that leverage mixed-precision computation.

The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are competitive for the class. In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 58,239, ranking at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58,392 (0.3% higher), placing the Arc A570M within striking distance of a desktop GPU that was considered high-end just a few years ago. This suggests that for OpenCL compute workloads — such as video encoding, image processing, and some scientific applications — the Arc A570M punches well above its mobile positioning. For rendering workloads that rely on rasterization and shader performance, the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates solid 1080p capability with the expectation of playable frame rates in most titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the estimated frame rates for esports titles should comfortably exceed 144 FPS, given the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,005. The 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide enough headroom for competitive settings without compromising responsiveness.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with a PassMark multi-thread score of 32,956 can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The Arc A570M’s OpenCL score of 58,239 suggests it can assist with encoding tasks, though dedicated hardware encoders are not specified in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,221 and the GPU’s 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput make this a capable platform for 1080p video editing and light 4K work. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing timelines, but 4K multi-stream editing may require proxies.

3D rendering: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 105,681 and the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide a balanced rendering pipeline. Blender or similar CPU-based renderers would benefit from the 16 cores, while GPU-accelerated renderers would see reasonable performance at 1080p output.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 312,927 and integer math score of 88,083 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The 25 W TDP supports sustained all-core loads without thermal throttling, which is critical for long build times.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4,005 ensures snappy response in productivity applications, while the 25 W TDP enables long battery life for all-day use. The integrated Arc B390 graphics provide a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle, reducing power draw.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds