SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

40,518 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A550M: Database Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 16-core Panther Lake mobile processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, creating a laptop platform that ranks at the 87th percentile overall. The CPU and GPU each sit close to their respective rivals in aggregate benchmark scores, with the processor at 87th percentile and the GPU at 86th percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare to its closest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 40518, placing it 0.1% behind the Intel Core 7 253PE (40557) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 223PE (40585). It edges ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Xeon 6507P, both at 0.2% delta.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 49737 is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001).

Q: What are the CPU's single-core and multi-core Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 3984 in single-core and 28221 in multi-core Cinebench R23. These results indicate strong single-thread performance for its mobile class, with the multi-core score reflecting the 16-core, 16-thread configuration.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform provide?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s. The GPU has its own 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's rendering throughput in FP32 and FP16?

A: The Arc A550M delivers 8.397 TFLOPS in FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1 ratio). Its pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H includes integrated Arc B390 graphics. This provides a fallback display output and basic rendering capability when the discrete A550M is not in use.

Q: What is the production status of both components?

A: The CPU is marked as Active production status, while the GPU is listed as End-of-life. The CPU was released in January 2026.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is modest for the GPU's compute capabilities but adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering workloads.

The shading engine consists of 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, with the GPU supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS places this GPU in a competitive mid-range mobile segment, while the FP16 rate of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) indicates strong compute potential for workloads that can utilize reduced precision.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580, with an average benchmark score of 49737. This places it at the 86th percentile, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 0.4% higher average score (49957). The GPU trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% (50951) but leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% (48477). For rendering tasks, the pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate capable fill rates, though the 128-bit memory bus may constrain performance in bandwidth-heavy scenarios such as high-resolution texture streaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15, it scores 401 in single-core and 2844 in multi-core. Cinebench R20 results show 1673 single-core and 11852 multi-core. The R23 scores of 3984 single-core and 28221 multi-core represent the most modern rendering test, with the multi-core result driven by the 16-core configuration. PassMark results are broadly consistent: single-thread score of 4005, multithread score of 32956, and a physics score of 2857. Integer math scores 88083, floating-point math scores 105681, and extended instructions score 25669, demonstrating well-rounded compute capability.

The CPU's percentile rank of 87 places it above the majority of all processors. Its average benchmark score of 40518 sits within 0.2% of its nearest rivals, indicating that performance is tightly clustered in this segment. The GPU's average score of 49737 at the 86th percentile similarly places it at the upper end of the GPU distribution, with rivals within a 2.6% band. Combined, this build achieves an overall percentile of 87, reflecting a balanced pairing where both components sit at nearly the same tier.

The combined picture shows a laptop platform that delivers strong CPU compute with single-core performance that will handle everyday responsiveness and multi-core throughput suitable for content creation. The GPU adds dedicated rendering power that, while not top-tier, competes with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, as indicated by its proximity to the RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile rank and estimated FPS capabilities suggest this laptop can drive 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supporting modern titles at competitive settings. The CPU's single-core score of 3984 in Cinebench R23 ensures strong frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. PassMark data compression score of 312927 and encryption score of 25228 indicate strong throughput for encoding pipelines, while the GPU's dedicated hardware assists in rendering the game itself.

Video Editing: The 28221 multi-core Cinebench R23 score suggests the CPU handles timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates effects and transitions that leverage half-precision compute, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large projects.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering workloads benefit from the 16-core configuration, as shown by the 11852 Cinebench R20 multi-core score. GPU-accelerated rendering can utilize the Arc A550M's 16 ray tracing cores and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, providing hybrid rendering capability for smaller scenes.

Software Development: The single-core score of 4005 in PassMark indicates fast compilation of single-threaded build steps and responsive IDE interactions. The 32956 PassMark multithread score accelerates parallel builds, while 18 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency in large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The 25 W TDP CPU combined with the 60 W GPU creates a power-efficient platform for extended battery operation. The integrated Arc B390 graphics provide a low-power display output for document work, while the discrete GPU activates for more demanding tasks. The 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multitasking across numerous office applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU both rank at the 87th and 86th percentiles respectively, creating a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40518 is within 0.2% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU's score of 49737 is within 2.6% of its competition. This alignment minimizes bottleneck conditions in most workloads.

In CPU-bound scenarios such as physics simulation or data compression, the processor's 16 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 2857 indicates strong, but not exceptional, single-thread physics performance. In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the Arc A550M's 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become the constraint, particularly at resolutions above 1440p where texture data exceeds the 8 GB VRAM capacity.

The 2.6% lead over the RX 6800 XT in GPU average score suggests the Arc A550M holds its own in raw compute, but the memory bandwidth difference will manifest in real-world gaming where texture streaming demands exceed the available bandwidth. The CPU's 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, shared with the GPU via the system, may also create contention in data-heavy workloads that simultaneously stress both processors. Overall, the platform is balanced for mixed workloads, with the GPU being the more likely bottleneck in gaming and the CPU limiting in heavily threaded productivity tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile rank and its benchmark proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% behind) and RX 6900 XT (2.4% behind), this laptop is expected to deliver high settings performance at 1080p in most modern titles. The 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest frame rates in the 60–100 FPS range for demanding AAA games at 1080p ultra settings. At 1440p, performance is likely to drop to the 40–70 FPS range, with the 8 GB VRAM potentially causing texture quality reductions in VRAM-heavy titles.

Esports and competitive titles, which are typically CPU-bound, will benefit from the processor's 3984 single-core Cinebench R23 score. Games like first-person shooters and MOBAs should sustain high refresh rates at 1080p with reduced graphics settings. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though performance will be substantially lower than rasterized rendering given the GPU's mid-range positioning. The 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance may provide a boost in games that utilize variable-rate shading or other half-precision techniques.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming and are willing to accept 1440p at moderate settings. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and proximity to desktop-class GPUs like the RX 6900 XT make it suitable for esports and mainstream AAA titles. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the 16-core CPU and the GPU's compute capabilities, particularly in hybrid CPU+GPU workflows where the 28221 multi-core Cinebench R23 score accelerates export times.

Software developers will find the strong single-thread performance (4005 PassMark single-thread) useful for compilation and the 16 threads beneficial for parallel build systems. The 18 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in data-intensive applications. Students and office workers will appreciate the power efficiency of the 25 W CPU TDP, which enables longer battery life for portable use, while the integrated Arc B390 graphics handle basic display tasks without engaging the discrete GPU. Small business workstations can leverage the platform's balanced performance for productivity suites, data analysis, and light creative work, with the 87th overall percentile ensuring no major performance deficiencies.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H processor with the Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3, built on Intel's 3 nm process with the Panther Lake architecture (Panther Lake-H generation). The GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip from the Alchemist generation, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process.

The platform ranks at the 87th percentile overall, placing it in the upper tier of all builds. The CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are nearly identical, indicating a harmonious pairing where neither component significantly drags down the other. The combined average benchmark scores (CPU: 40518, GPU: 49737) are competitive with rivals, and the build occupies a strong position for a laptop platform, delivering desktop-class compute in a mobile form factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It features a 3 nm process node from Intel's foundry, with the Panther Lake architecture and a BGA 2540 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This 16-core configuration without hyperthreading suggests a design optimized for physical cores rather than thread duplication, which can benefit power efficiency in mobile applications.

The CPU's TDP of 25 W is remarkably low for a 16-core processor, indicating the 3 nm process delivers significant efficiency gains. Memory support includes dual-channel LPDDR5X with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth, providing adequate throughput for both CPU and GPU data access. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 4 CPU lanes offers fast connectivity for NVMe storage and other peripherals, though the limited lane count means the GPU likely connects via a separate chipset path.

Benchmark results show strong performance across productivity and compute workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 is substantial for a 25 W TDP part, demonstrating the efficiency of the Panther Lake architecture. Single-core performance of 3984 in R23 indicates competitive per-thread performance, important for applications that scale poorly across cores. PassMark results show 312927 in data compression and 25228 in data encryption, suggesting strong throughput for data-centric workloads. The floating-point math score of 105681 versus integer math at 88083 indicates the architecture favors FPU-intensive tasks, which bodes well for scientific computing and rendering workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning CPU upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense. The memory support is dual-channel LPDDR5X with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth, and the system likely uses soldered memory given the laptop form factor, limiting upgradeability. PCIe Gen 5 with 4 CPU lanes provides fast connectivity for compatible storage devices, though expansion options are constrained by the mobile platform.

The GPU is marked as End-of-life, and as a mobile component (slot width: IGP), it is likely soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined TDP of 25 W (CPU) and 60 W (GPU) indicates a total platform power draw that is modest for a laptop, suggesting a power adapter in the 100–150 W range would suffice based on typical mobile platform overhead. The production status of the GPU as End-of-life means replacement parts may become scarce, though the CPU remains Active.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to an external GPU enclosure if the laptop supports Thunderbolt or USB4 connectivity, leveraging the PCIe Gen 5 interface for bandwidth. Alternatively, upgrading to a laptop with a newer generation Arc GPU would provide improved ray tracing and memory bandwidth, as the current 128-bit bus is a known limitation. For users seeking more CPU performance, a higher-tier Panther Lake-H processor with a higher boost clock or additional cache would be the natural progression, though this would require a full system replacement given the BGA socket.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds