SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

43,210 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H + Intel Arc A570M

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H paired with the Intel Arc A570M is a mobile laptop combination that targets the upper tier of portable computing performance. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile of all processors, while the GPU also lands in the 88th percentile of all graphics cards, giving this pairing a combined percentile of 88. The processor is a 16-core, 16-thread Panther Lake-H part built on Intel's 3 nm process, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 2048 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a capable pairing for demanding workloads, though the data shows some interesting asymmetries between CPU and GPU capabilities.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. There is no frame rate data at any resolution or quality setting. Consequently, all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct measurement. Treat these figures as directional expectations rather than verified results.

The GPU's computed Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is exceptional for a mobile part. Benchmark results indicate this GPU sits within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (score 58392) and 0.5% below the NVIDIA P102-100 (score 58528). These are desktop-class comparisons, suggesting the Arc A570M is no lightweight. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this level of compute performance should deliver fluid frame rates in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus may become limiting factors at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads.

At 1440p, the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will likely hold up in moderately demanding games, but the GPU's position relative to the Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% ahead) suggests it is more of a high-end 1080p performer than a true 1440p ultra card. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT, but the modest 1300 MHz boost clock means ray-traced scenes will likely see significant frame rate drops compared to rasterized rendering. The CPU's single-thread score of 4218 in PassMark and multi-thread score of 35399 should prevent most CPU-bound bottlenecks in gaming, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a fairly balanced pairing with a slight GPU-lean in gaming workloads. The CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile are identical, indicating neither component dramatically outclasses the other. However, the CPU's multi-threaded scores are notably strong relative to its single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 20547 is roughly 9.9 times the single-core score of 2071.5, showing excellent scaling across the 16 cores. For gaming, where single-thread performance often matters most, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4218 is solid but not class-leading.

The GPU's FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s suggest it can feed frames faster than the CPU's single-thread performance can issue draw calls in some scenarios. Conversely, in CPU-heavy titles or at lower resolutions, the processor should be able to keep up with the GPU's output. The 16 cores with 16 threads (no hyperthreading) handle parallel workloads well, but the lack of additional threads means heavily threaded games that benefit from SMT may see slightly reduced performance compared to competitors with similar core counts and hyperthreading.

The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for the CPU when feeding the GPU, especially in games that stream large amounts of texture data. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is higher, but the CPU-to-GPU data path through the PCIe Gen 5 x8 interface (12 lanes CPU only) should provide ample throughput. Overall, the balance leans toward the GPU being the limiting factor at 1080p ultra settings, with the CPU becoming more relevant at lower resolutions or with high refresh rate targets.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 43210, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43431 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Core i9-12900 scores 42906 (0.7% lower). The Core Ultra 9 386H essentially trades blows with desktop-class i9 parts from a previous generation, which is impressive for a 25 W mobile processor.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 20547 and single-core score of 2071.5 are strong indicators of sustained performance. The R20 multi-core score of 12820 and R15 multi-core score of 3223 follow the expected scaling pattern. PassMark results show specific workload strengths: data compression scores 352365, floating point math scores 108527, and integer math scores 87284. The extended instructions score of 29138 suggests good SIMD performance, while the physics score of 3028 is moderate.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58239, also in the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 0.3% higher), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.3% lower), NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, 0.5% higher), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 0.7% higher). The fact that this mobile GPU trades within 0.7% of desktop GPUs is notable. Combined, the CPU and GPU scores indicate a system that can handle both compute-heavy and graphics-heavy tasks without a clear weak point.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who need desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor. The build class is explicitly "laptop," so this is not a desktop DIY build. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate displays will find the GPU's performance adequate for most titles, especially given the 88th percentile standing. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and strong multi-threaded scores, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 2048 shading units can accelerate rendering tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's high integer math score of 87284 and data compression score of 352365. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the balance of CPU and GPU performance suitable for both coursework and gaming. Small business users running virtual machines or data analysis workloads can leverage the 16 threads and the PassMark multithread score of 35399. The system is less suited for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing workloads, where the GPU's memory bandwidth and RT core count would be stretched thin.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 and carries the codename Panther Lake, with the specific market segment being Mobile. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 25 W, making it an efficient part for laptops. The socket is Intel BGA 2540, confirming it is soldered to the motherboard.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration supports the strong single-thread performance seen in the benchmarks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2071.5 is competitive with desktop parts, while the multi-core score of 20547 demonstrates excellent scaling across all 16 cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 4218 is solid, and the multithread score of 35399 confirms the CPU's ability to handle parallel workloads.

The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics, which provides a fallback display output but is not intended for gaming. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 12 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and storage. The production status is active, with a release date of January 4, 2026, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the DG2-256 chip, using the Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a die size of 269 mm², giving a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The TDP is rated at 75 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the laptop rather than a separate card.

The memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The shading units number 2048, with 128 texture mapping units and 64 render output units. There are 16 ray tracing cores, and the pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 10.65 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The production status is active, with a release date of July 31, 2023. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile, trading within 0.7% of desktop GPUs like the Radeon RX 6950 XT. This indicates the A570M can handle modern game rendering at 1080p with high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint for future titles with large texture packs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU cannot be upgraded in place; users would need to replace the entire laptop to change processors. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, and the memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s is fixed by the memory controller. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 12 lanes (CPU only) provides high-speed connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage.

The GPU is described as an IGP with a 75 W TDP, which in a laptop context means it is not user-upgradeable. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating no external power supply specification is provided. The GPU's TDP of 75 W combined with the CPU's TDP of 25 W suggests a total system power draw around 100 W for the core components, which is typical for a thin-and-light gaming laptop. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s is a fixed constraint. Adding a high-speed NVMe drive through the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would reduce load times. For users needing more graphics performance, the only option would be a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as the A570M cannot be replaced. The platform is otherwise well-balanced, with no obvious single point of failure in the upgrade path.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, with both the CPU and GPU individually sitting in the 88th percentile of their respective categories.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an average score of 43326, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 9 386H's score of 43210. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The base clock is 2.10 GHz, the boost clock is 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is 25 W.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 16 ray tracing cores, along with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 20547, while the single-core score is 2071.5.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile standing and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, though the 1300 MHz boost clock and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in the most demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4218 ensures minimal bottlenecking.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores handle encoding workloads well, with a PassMark multithread score of 35399 and extended instructions score of 29138 supporting efficient video encoding. The GPU's 2048 shading units can assist with rendering while streaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20547 and PassMark floating point math score of 108527 indicate strong performance for rendering and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate preview and export tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 2048 shading units provide a balanced rendering pipeline. The GPU's 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate support complex scenes, while the 18 MB L3 cache aids CPU-side geometry processing.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 87284 and data compression score of 352365 are strong for code compilation and version control operations. The 16 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock speeds up single-threaded tasks.

Student and office work: The 25 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP make this an efficient pairing for battery-conscious use. The CPU's single-thread score of 4218 and the GPU's 58239 OpenCL score handle productivity applications and light creative work with ease.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H processor with the Intel Arc A570M GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake-H part on Intel's 3 nm process, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip on TSMC's 6 nm process. Both components sit in the 88th percentile of their respective categories, giving a combined percentile of 88. The system is designed for mobile users who need high performance in gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks without the bulk of a desktop setup. The pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded compute and the GPU delivering desktop-comparable graphics performance in a portable form factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds