SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus

84,003 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop combination with a flagship 24-core CPU and a mid-range 8 GB GPU. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact pairing; all gaming expectations are derived from the component benchmark scores and percentiles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It runs on the Intel Socket 1851 platform and is manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and the TDP is 125 W. The chip supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC support. For expansion, it provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself.

Cache is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool. This hierarchy supports the high throughput seen in the benchmark suite. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 51,731 points in multi-core and 7,303 points in single-core. The R20 run yields 21,727 multi-core and 3,067 single-core; R15 shows 5,214 multi-core and 736 single-core. PassMark results reinforce the pattern: multithread score 60,860, single-thread 4,823, integer math 166,194, floating-point math 214,760, and data compression 698,346.

The CPU sits in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 84,003. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (average 83,807, delta 0.2% – the 290K is slightly higher), AMD EPYC 4584PX (83,090, delta 1.1%), AMD EPYC 9135 (82,980, delta 1.2%), and the AMD EPYC 7F72 (85,072, delta −1.3%, meaning the EPYC is 1.3% ahead). This places the 290K among the top desktop and server chips, with the edge over the 285K being marginal but real.

For real workloads, the 24 physical cores (no hyperthreading, hence 24 threads) deliver massive parallel throughput. Cinebench multi-core scores indicate strong performance in rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks. The high single-core boost of 5.80 GHz supports snappy response in games and lightly threaded applications. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU is the primary workhorse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the Intel Arc A750. The FACT PACK contains no `measuredFpsUltraByGame` entries, so all frame-rate expectations below are estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612, and its PassMark G3D score is 12,534. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 7,303 indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A750, with its 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, is likely the limiting component. The GPU’s 66th percentile among all GPUs suggests it can handle high refresh rates at 1080p with reduced settings, but not consistently at ultra details in the latest AAA titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck; the CPU still has headroom. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will restrict the experience. The CPU’s 96th percentile means it can feed the GPU effectively at any resolution, so the GPU is the determining factor in frame rate.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 places the A750 in the same performance tier as the Arc B570 (average 20,556, delta 0.1%) and the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, delta 0.2%). This is a mid-range tier, so expectations should be high-end 1080p or entry-level 1440p gaming, with no 4K high-fidelity ambitions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming – The CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 7,303) and the GPU’s 3DMark score of 2,612 suggest that 1080p high-refresh gaming is viable. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough for most e-sports and moderate graphical settings.

Streaming – The CPU’s 24 threads and PassMark multithread score of 60,860 allow software encoding while gaming without severe performance loss. The GPU also supports hardware acceleration via its Xe-HPG architecture, though the CPU’s headroom makes it a strong streaming base.

Video editing – Cinebench R23 multi-core 51,731 and PassMark integer math 166,194 indicate strong export and timeline performance. The GPU’s FP32 17.20 TFLOPS assists with effects and GPU-accelerated previews.

3D rendering – The CPU’s multi-core score is excellent for CPU-based renderers, and the GPU’s 3DMark and FP32 throughput support hybrid rendering. The 8 GB VRAM may limit complex scenes, but the CPU will not be the bottleneck.

Software development – The single-core 7,303 and multi-core 51,731 provide fast compilation and script execution. The 24 threads allow parallel builds, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency.

Student and office work – The CPU’s integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG 64EU) can handle basic display tasks, and the discrete GPU is overkill for office workloads. The 125 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU make it a power-conscious workstation.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who want a very high-end CPU for productivity and a capable mid-range GPU for gaming. The CPU is in the 96th percentile, suitable for content creators, developers, and professionals who rely on multithreaded performance. The GPU, at 66th percentile, serves gamers at 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium settings. It is not a 4K gaming system. Small business workstations that run CPU-heavy calculations, compile code, or encode video will benefit from the 24 cores. Students who need a versatile desktop for coursework, light gaming, and occasional rendering will find the pair balanced, though the GPU is more than needed for office tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the stronger component in this pairing. Its 96th percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means the CPU has substantial headroom. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at any resolution—at 1080p the GPU may struggle to keep up with the CPU’s ability to feed frames, and at 1440p/4K the GPU becomes even more restrictive. The CPU’s 0.2% advantage over the Core Ultra 9 285K and its 1.1% lead over the EPYC 4584PX show that the CPU is not a bottleneck for any current game. Conversely, the GPU’s 0.1% delta over the Arc B570 and 0.2% over the RTX 3070 Mobile indicates that the GPU sits at a performance plateau. In CPU-intensive workloads (rendering, encoding), the CPU will be the dominant performer, and the GPU will play a supporting role. For gaming, the GPU limits the system; for productivity, the CPU is the star.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 (LGA1851) platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will run at 4.0 speeds, which is sufficient. The platform supports ECC memory, which is rare for consumer chips. The GPU is an end-of-life product (released October 2022, succeeded by Battlemage), but the system can accept a newer GPU later. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the CPU TDP is 125 W, leaving a combined power draw of about 350 W, so a 550 W unit has headroom. A sensible next upgrade is to replace the GPU with a higher-tier card, since the CPU has ample headroom. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: true) allows overclocking, though the boost is already 5.80 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 84,003, and the GPU’s is 20,582. The combined percentile of this pairing is 81. The CPU’s score places it in the 96th percentile, with the nearest rival being the Core Ultra 9 285K at 83,807 (0.2% lower). The AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83,090 is 1.1% behind, and the EPYC 9135 at 82,980 is 1.2% behind. The EPYC 7F72 at 85,072 is 1.3% ahead, showing the 290K is slightly below the best server part. The GPU’s 20,582 average places it at the 66th percentile, with the Arc B570 at 20,556 (0.1% higher), the RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.2% higher), and the R9 M390X at 20,662 (−0.4% lower). The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier chip, the GPU is a mid-range part, and the overall 81st percentile indicates a well-balanced desktop for most tasks, with the CPU carrying the performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A750 have?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory in its dual-channel DDR5 configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A750’s memory bandwidth is 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Arc A750 delivers 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A750 is 550 W.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, Arc 7) and uses the DG2-512 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process. It contains 21,700 million transistors in a 406 mm² die, with a density of 53.4 million transistors per mm². The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 28 ray-tracing cores. The base clock is 2050 MHz, boost 2400 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, texture rate 537.6 GTexel/s, and it achieves 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The GPU is dual-slot, consumes 225 W TDP, and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554, and Vulkan score of 85,631. PassMark results: DirectX 9 181, DirectX 10 65, DirectX 11 72, DirectX 12 70, G2D 732, G3D 12,534, and GPU compute 5,368. The GPU sits in the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 20,582. Its nearest rivals are the Arc B570 (20,556, delta 0.1% – the A750 is slightly higher), the RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, delta 0.2%), and the AMD R9 M3900 (20,662, delta −0.4% – the R9 is 0.4% higher). The GPU is end-of-life (released October 2022) and is succeeded by Battlemage. Its launch MSRP is 289 USD.

For rendering, the GPU’s FP32 17.20 TFLOPS and 28 RT cores provide a solid foundation for ray-traced effects and compute workloads, but the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large textures and high-resolution scenes. The memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is ample for the shading and texture operations. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 2,612 places it in a mid-range tier, which aligns with its 66th percentile. In a system with a 96th-percentile CPU, the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks, but the combination is coherent for 1080p gaming and general productivity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds