SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

23,219 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This benchmark entry examines the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V paired with the Intel Arc A570M, a laptop-class combination from the Core Ultra Series 2 and Arc Alchemist lineups. The data shows a system that sits at the 82nd combined percentile, indicating a strong overall performer for mobile workloads. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; therefore, all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and relative performance metrics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this mobile platform. The CPU, an Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, holds a 76th percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU, an Intel Arc A570M, ranks higher at the 88th percentile against all GPUs. This suggests that in a purely raw compute sense, the graphics processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. However, the CPU is not a slouch; its single-threaded Passmark score of 4274 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1950 indicate a very capable processor for latency-sensitive tasks.

The potential bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 58239 is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, but 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. This places it in a tier where it can handle demanding titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain performance in texture-heavy or 4K scenarios. The CPU, on the other hand, has the headroom to feed the GPU; its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 10178 is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, a proven gaming CPU.

In productivity and content creation, the balance tips the other way. The CPU’s 8 cores and 8 threads are efficient, but they are not heavily threaded. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10178 is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-11900F, a desktop part with more power headroom. This suggests that in heavily multi-threaded rendering tasks, the CPU could become the bottleneck before the GPU does. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239, which is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100, indicates strong compute potential that could outpace the CPU’s ability to feed it data in certain parallel workloads. Overall, the system is well-balanced for mixed use, but the GPU is the star for graphics-intensive tasks while the CPU holds its own for general and single-threaded performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A570M is positioned to deliver solid 1080p and potentially 1440p gaming experiences. Its benchmark score places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop card, suggesting it can handle modern titles at high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4274 Passmark) ensures that frame pacing remains stable, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture detail reductions in the most demanding games.

Streaming: This workload relies on both the CPU for encoding and the GPU for rendering. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 19810 on Passmark indicates it can handle the encoding overhead, while the GPU’s dedicated hardware (16 RT cores) ensures that the game itself continues to run smoothly. The system’s 82nd combined percentile suggests it is capable of a single-PC streaming setup for most titles.

Video Editing: The combination is strong for 1080p and 1440p video editing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10178, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 4124P, provides enough processing power for timeline scrubbing and effects. The GPU’s 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerate export and rendering tasks, making this a capable mobile workstation for editors.

3D Rendering: The CPU will be the primary constraint in CPU-based renderers. Its 8-core, 8-thread configuration scores 10178 in Cinebench R23, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-11900F. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 RT cores provide substantial acceleration, making it a better choice for real-time viewports and GPU-rendered final frames.

Software Development: The CPU excels in this scenario. The single-thread score of 4274 in Passmark is excellent for compilation times of smaller projects and IDE responsiveness. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth help with large codebases. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capabilities can be used for local testing of machine learning models.

Student and Office Work: This system is overpowered for basic office tasks, but that is not a weakness. The CPU’s efficiency (30 W TDP) means long battery life for note-taking and web browsing. The integrated Arc 140V GPU handles video playback and display output, while the discrete Arc A570M remains idle, preserving power. For students in engineering or design programs, the GPU provides the necessary acceleration for CAD and creative software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is a closed book in terms of CPU upgrades. The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is soldered to the motherboard on an Intel BGA 2833 socket, meaning the processor cannot be swapped for a newer model. The memory is also fixed as LPDDR5X, which is soldered to the board. The primary upgrade path is therefore external, via the PCIe Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) interface. This allows for high-speed NVMe storage upgrades, which can improve load times and overall system responsiveness.

The GPU is also not upgradeable, as it is an integrated part of the laptop's design (slot width is listed as "IGP"). The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface for the GPU is internal and not accessible to the user. The 30 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU suggest that the system's power delivery is tuned for this specific configuration. There is no suggested PSU listed, but the low combined TDP of 105 W implies a relatively modest power adapter is sufficient. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be expanding NVMe storage to accommodate a growing game library or video project files, rather than attempting to improve core compute performance.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V a good processor for gaming?

A: Yes, it is well-suited for gaming. Its Passmark single-thread score of 4274 is strong, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1950 indicates excellent per-core performance. The data shows it is a capable partner for the Arc A570M GPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this laptop handle 4K video editing?

A: The system is better suited for 1080p and 1440p editing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may be limiting for complex 4K timelines, though the GPU's compute performance (58239 OpenCL score) is strong.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5, but it is limited to 4 lanes (CPU only). This is intended for connecting high-speed NVMe storage devices.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a total memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the GPU perform relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has an average benchmark score of 58239, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, placing it in a competitive mid-to-high range.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, indicating that the CPU is not unlocked for overclocking. The 30 W TDP also suggests it is designed for efficient, sustained performance rather than manual tuning.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is targeted at users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the Arc A570M's performance, which is within 0.3% of the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL benchmarks, sufficient for high-refresh-rate esports titles and demanding AAA games. Content creators, specifically video editors working with 1080p and 1440p footage, will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-thread score (10178 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth for fast exports.

Developers will appreciate the high single-thread performance (4274 in Passmark) for snappy code compilation and the 12 MB L3 cache for frequently accessed data. Students in technical fields, such as engineering or computer science, can leverage the CPU's efficiency (30 W TDP) for all-day battery life, while the GPU's compute capabilities (5.325 TFLOPS FP32) are ready for CAD or simulation projects. Small business workstations that require occasional 3D rendering or video processing will find this a capable machine, as the combined 82nd percentile ranking indicates it sits above most competing laptops. The system is less ideal for users who require extreme multi-threaded rendering power, as the CPU's 8 threads are a limiting factor compared to higher-core-count desktop parts.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial. It delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). The rasterization rates are 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s for pixel and texture fill, respectively. For ray tracing, the GPU includes 16 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This score is 0.3% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100, a professional-grade card, and 0.7% lower than the AMD Radeon PRO V710. This suggests that the A570M is not just a gaming GPU; its compute performance is competitive with professional workstation parts, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering and compute tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most current games at 1080p and 1440p, but it may be a limiting factor for 4K textures or large machine learning models.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V demonstrates strong CPU performance across various benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10178 in multi-core and 1950 in single-core tests. The multi-core score is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-11900F, a desktop processor, and 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 4124P. The single-core score of 1950 is robust for a mobile chip. In Passmark, the CPU achieves a single-thread score of 4274 and a multi-thread score of 19810, with a data encryption score of 14141 and a floating-point math score of 59536. The CPU's average benchmark score is 23219, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs.

The Intel Arc A570M GPU has a single benchmark entry: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. This score places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is identical at 58239. The nearest rivals for the GPU include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.3% higher score), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% lower score), and the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.5% higher score). This data indicates that the GPU is a high-performing mobile part, outperforming the majority of its peers.

The combined picture is a laptop that performs well above average. The system holds an 82nd combined percentile, indicating that it outperforms 82% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. Since no measured FPS data is available, these benchmark scores are the primary indicator of gaming performance. The CPU and GPU scores suggest that the system can handle modern games at high settings in 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU providing the majority of the graphics horsepower.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, a mobile processor from the Lunar Lake architecture, with the Intel Arc A570M, a mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is explicitly "laptop," indicating this is a mobile platform designed for portability without sacrificing performance. The CPU is built on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the GPU uses a 6 nm TSMC process.

Overall, this is a high-tier mobile configuration. The combined percentile of 82 places it above the vast majority of competing laptops. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking is solid for a mobile processor, while the GPU's 88th percentile ranking is excellent, making the discrete graphics the strongest component of this pairing. This is a balanced system where the GPU is the performance leader, but the CPU is more than capable of keeping up. The 30 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU suggest a well-tuned power envelope that balances performance with battery life, a crucial factor for a laptop. This is a system built for users who need desktop-class graphics performance in a portable chassis.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Lunar Lake architecture and built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU is designed for a 30 W TDP, making it highly power-efficient. It is soldered to the motherboard via the Intel BGA 2833 socket and is not upgradeable.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The memory controller supports LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. This high bandwidth is critical for feeding both the CPU cores and the integrated Arc 140V GPU. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for high-speed storage devices.

In benchmark tests, the CPU shows strong single-thread performance, which is essential for gaming and general responsiveness. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1950 and Passmark single-thread score of 4274 are competitive with the best mobile processors. The multi-thread performance is good but not exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10178. This is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-11900F, a desktop part with a higher TDP. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 19810 and data compression score of 186521 indicate that it handles everyday multitasking and file operations with ease. The CPU's average benchmark score of 23219 places it in the 76th percentile, making it a top-tier mobile processor for a wide range of tasks, though not the absolute fastest in multi-threaded scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds