SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080: A Desktop Powerhouse with Unusual Constraints

This desktop build pairs Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake flagship with NVIDIA's Ampere-generation RTX 3080, creating a system that sits at the 80th percentile overall among all tracked combinations. The CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded throughput with an extremely low 35W TDP, while the GPU offers strong 1440p and 4K rasterization performance despite being two generations old. The data shows a system where the processor's efficiency and the graphics card's raw bandwidth create a balanced but peculiar pairing—one that excels in productivity workloads while remaining competitive in gaming, though with notable caveats around the GPU's aging feature set and the absence of measured frame data for this exact configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on TSMC's 3 nm process node, featuring the Arrow Lake architecture from the Core Ultra Series 2 family. With a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, this chip prioritizes efficiency over raw sustained clocks—the 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core desktop part, suggesting heavy reliance on the boost behavior to deliver performance when needed. The processor integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a functional iGPU fallback, and supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds.

Benchmark results illustrate a processor that punches well above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the 285T scores 33,573 points in multi-core and 4,739 in single-core. The multi-core figure places it firmly in high-end desktop territory, while the single-core score indicates strong per-thread performance for lightly threaded applications. PassMark results reinforce this picture: the multithread score of 39,931 and single-thread score of 4,576 show balanced capability across both metrics. The data compression score of 384,140 and floating-point math score of 137,923 suggest the CPU handles data-heavy and scientific workloads with ease, while the integer math score of 132,433 and extended instructions score of 27,477 indicate robust general-purpose and SIMD performance.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 285T sits in a tight competitive cluster. The data shows it is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T, 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, while trailing the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.8%. These deltas are within noise for most workloads, meaning the 285T effectively matches its closest competitors while offering the distinct advantage of a far lower TDP. The 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier processor, and the average benchmark score of 51,310 reflects consistent high performance across the suite.

The architecture's 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die demonstrate a dense, modern design. The cache hierarchy—192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3—provides ample on-die storage for demanding workloads. For real-world tasks, this translates to rapid data access in multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and simulation scenarios. The 24 threads (no hyperthreading) mean the CPU relies on physical cores alone, which is sufficient for most parallel workloads but can be a minor limitation in heavily oversubscribed scenarios. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option—users must rely on the factory boost behavior.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, featuring 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GA102 chip includes 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, along with 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. Clock speeds are set at 1,440 MHz base and 1,710 MHz boost, with memory running at 19 Gbps effective. The 10 GB of GDDR6X memory operates across a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth—a figure that remains competitive even against newer cards. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark performance shows a card that still holds its own in the current landscape. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 152,423 and 33,620 respectively reflect strong compute and graphics capabilities. PassMark results are more mixed: the G3D score of 25,086 is respectable, but the DirectX 12 score of 100 is notably low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 207 and DirectX 9 score of 258—suggesting that the card's older architecture may not fully optimize for the latest API features. The GPU compute score of 14,397 confirms adequate compute throughput for non-gaming tasks. The pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s indicate the card can fill frames quickly at high resolutions.

The RTX 3080's percentile ranking of 68th among all GPUs places it in the upper-mid range, and its average benchmark score of 23,172 shows consistent performance. However, the nearest rivals listed are surprising: the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X all sit within 0.4% of the 3080's score. This clustering suggests that the average benchmark score may be skewed by the low DirectX 12 result, pulling the 3080 down relative to its raw rasterization capabilities. In practice, the RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate it should outperform these rivals in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where bandwidth matters most. The 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, though the first-generation RT implementation on Ampere is less efficient than newer architectures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 9 285T and RTX 3080 is unusual due to the CPU's extreme efficiency. With a 35W TDP, the CPU draws a fraction of the GPU's 320W TDP, meaning the GPU is the dominant power consumer and likely the primary constraint in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile suggests the processor has significant headroom over the graphics card in most scenarios—the 285T can feed frames faster than the 3080 can render them in CPU-bound situations. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU pulling the system's overall position upward.

In gaming at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU's single-thread performance (4,576 PassMark single-thread score) and high boost clock of 5.40 GHz should prevent most CPU bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to be the limiting factor. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput become the primary drivers of frame rates, and the 10 GB VRAM may become a constraint in the most demanding titles. The CPU's 24 cores are unlikely to be fully utilized in most games, meaning the 285T's multi-threaded advantages (33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core) are more relevant to productivity workloads than gaming. The data shows a system where the CPU has ample headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the current pairing is well-matched for 1440p gaming and content creation, with the GPU being the first component to reach its limits.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance without the power draw of traditional high-end processors. The 285T's 35W TDP makes it ideal for small form factor or power-constrained builds, while the RTX 3080 provides sufficient graphics power for high-refresh 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth handle GPU-accelerated effects and previews. Students and small business workstations that require reliable multi-tasking and occasional GPU acceleration would find this pairing capable, though the GPU's 320W TDP and dual-slot footprint may be excessive for purely office-oriented tasks. Gamers at 1440p will see strong performance, while those targeting 4K should temper expectations given the 3080's 68th percentile ranking.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285T delivers standout CPU benchmark scores across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,384 in multi-core and 477 in single-core; in R20, 14,100 multi-core and 1,990 single-core; and in R23, 33,573 multi-core and 4,739 single-core. PassMark results show 39,931 in multithread, 4,576 in single-thread, 137,923 in floating-point math, 132,433 in integer math, and 384,140 in data compression. The CPU's average benchmark score is 51,310, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival comparisons show it within 1.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and 1.1% of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, while leading the Intel Core i9-14900T by 0.6% and trailing the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.8%.

The RTX 3080's benchmark results are more varied. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407, Geekbench OpenCL is 152,423, and Geekbench Vulkan is 33,620. PassMark shows 25,086 in G3D, 14,397 in GPU compute, and notably low DirectX scores: 100 in DX12, 207 in DX11, 170 in DX10, and 258 in DX9. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it at the 68th percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.4%—a clustering driven by the inconsistent DirectX results. The combined picture is a CPU that ranks in the top 10% and a GPU in the upper third, resulting in a system at the 80th combined percentile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, along with the 285T's strong single-thread score of 4,576, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock should prevent bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to push well above 100 FPS in esports titles and competitive shooters. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth advantage becomes more pronounced, with estimated frame rates in the 80-120 FPS range for AAA games on ultra settings. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM and 68th percentile GPU ranking suggest frame rates will drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, with reduced settings required for smoother play. The low DirectX 12 PassMark score of 100 raises concerns about API overhead, potentially limiting performance in DX12-heavy games, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,407 suggests the card can handle modern DX12 workloads. Ray tracing performance will be modest given the 68 RT cores, and DLSS support via the 272 tensor cores can help offset the VRAM and bandwidth constraints at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285T uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. Memory support is limited to DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with ECC capability for error-sensitive workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the RTX 3080 uses PCIe 4.0 x16—this means the GPU operates at a lower PCIe generation than the CPU supports, but this is unlikely to bottleneck performance given the 3080's bandwidth requirements. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 35W TDP and the GPU's 320W TDP combined, plus other system components. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with higher VRAM capacity and better DirectX 12 performance, as the CPU's 24 cores and 91st percentile ranking will remain relevant for several years. However, the 285T's non-unlocked multiplier limits CPU overclocking, so any performance gains must come from GPU or memory upgrades. The GPU's end-of-life status means no new features will arrive, but its 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth remain sufficient for current games.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data-integrity-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the 285T compare to the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The 285T scores 0.6% higher in average benchmark score (51,310 vs. 51,015), placing it slightly ahead of the i9-14900T.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 still competitive in 2025?

A: The GPU ranks at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 23,172, indicating it remains in the upper-mid range but lags newer cards.

Q: What is the TDP of the Core Ultra 9 285T?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, which is exceptionally low for a 24-core desktop processor.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 is notably low.

Q: What socket does the 285T use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1851, which is exclusive to Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) CPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, paired with the 285T's 5.40 GHz boost clock, should deliver well over 100 FPS at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, though the GPU's 68th percentile ranking limits 4K performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for encoding and overlays, while the GPU's 272 tensor cores can offload encoding tasks, though the 10 GB VRAM may be tight for simultaneous gaming and streaming at high resolutions.

Video editing: The 285T's 384,140 data compression score and 137,923 floating-point math score excel in codec-heavy workloads, while the 3080's 14,397 GPU compute score accelerates effects and exports; the 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores deliver strong multi-threaded rendering (33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core), and the GPU's 68 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, though render times will be slower than with newer GPUs.

Software development: The 285T's 132,433 integer math score and 24 threads handle compilation and testing efficiently, while the 35W TDP keeps power draw low during long build sessions.

Student and office work: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a display output without the discrete GPU, and the CPU's 35W TDP enables quiet, low-power operation, though the RTX 3080 is overkill for document processing and web browsing.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, a 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with a 35W TDP and 91st percentile CPU ranking, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, an Ampere-generation GPU with 10 GB GDDR6X memory, 68 RT cores, and a 68th percentile GPU ranking. The system sits at the 80th combined percentile among all tracked builds, reflecting a CPU that far outclasses its GPU partner in relative performance. The 285T's exceptional efficiency and multi-threaded throughput make it a standout choice for productivity-focused users, while the RTX 3080 provides competent but aging graphics performance. This is a desktop-class build that balances raw compute power with moderate gaming capability, though the GPU's end-of-life status and the absence of measured FPS data mean real-world gaming performance should be validated independently. The 35W CPU TDP combined with the 320W GPU TDP results in a system that is power-efficient for its class, and the 700 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom.