SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a unique desktop configuration where an ultra-low-power, high-core-count CPU meets a mid-range discrete GPU. The data shows a system built on a fundamental asymmetry: the processor is capable of top-tier multi-threaded work, while the graphics card is positioned for solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Core Ultra 9 285T sits in the 91st percentile for all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,310. This places it in the upper echelon of processors, trading blows with rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900T, which scores 51,015 (a 0.6% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13900F, which scores 51,730 (-0.8% delta). The CPU is clearly not the limiting factor in most workloads.

The GPU, by contrast, is in the 65th percentile for all GPUs, with an average score of 20,556. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534 score, 0.1% delta) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582 score, -0.1% delta). This puts the Arc B570 in a performance class that is significantly lower than the CPU’s standing. The bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU in any graphics-intensive task.

Benchmark results indicate a massive gap in compute potential. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 39,931 and floating-point math score of 137,923 dwarf the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14,195. For gaming, this means the Arc B570 will be the primary constraint, and the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU to deliver frames. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,576 (PassMark) is strong enough to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates. The system is balanced for productivity where the CPU is the star, but unbalanced for gaming where the GPU is the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the weakest scenario for this pairing. The Arc B570’s 65th percentile standing and its nearest rivals (RTX 3070 Mobile, Arc A750) suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming, but not at high refresh rates in demanding titles. The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock and 91st percentile ranking ensure no CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU’s 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.52 TFLOPS will likely hold frame rates to the 60-100 FPS range in esports titles, and lower in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU excels here. With 24 cores and 24 threads, the Core Ultra 9 285T can handle game encoding and streaming overhead without breaking a sweat. Its PassMark data compression score of 384,140 is exceptionally high, indicating fast video encoding and processing. The GPU’s 65th percentile position is adequate for rendering the game itself, but the CPU’s headroom is the key asset.

Video Editing: The data strongly supports this use case. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 is a top-tier result, and the PassMark integer math score of 132,433 indicates strong performance in codec-heavy tasks. The Arc B570’s 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, and its OpenCL score of 83,514 provides hardware acceleration. The CPU will render exports quickly, while the GPU handles effects and previews.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed bag. CPU-based rendering will be exceptional, as indicated by the 33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, GPU-based rendering is limited by the Arc B570’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 compute. While the GPU has 18 RT cores, its performance is not in the same league as the CPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 is modest, suggesting long GPU render times for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU’s 24 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache are excellent for compilation. The PassMark extended instructions score of 27,477 and encryption score of 32,061 show strong performance in cryptographic and SIMD-heavy workloads. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant here, making this a pure CPU strength scenario.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for most tasks, but the efficiency is notable. The 35W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle basic display output. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,576 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for this workload, but the system is more than capable.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 35W TDP. This is a power-sipping processor that does not sacrifice multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its 91st percentile ranking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and productivity, reducing memory latency. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is slightly below competing high-end desktop parts but adequate for the 24 cores.

Benchmark results show a strong single-core performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,576. This translates to excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games. The multi-core scores are the real story: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33,573 and PassMark multithread of 39,931. These scores place it in the top 9% of all CPUs, slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T (0.6% delta) and behind the Intel Core i9-13900F (-0.8% delta). The 24 threads are all physical cores, no hyper-threading, which can be a benefit for power efficiency and thermal management.

The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate a dense, modern design. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the 35W TDP suggests the chip is already optimized for efficiency. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU is a bonus, providing a functional iGPU for troubleshooting or office use without the discrete card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2. This is a current-generation platform, so the upgrade path is limited to other Socket 1851 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, ensuring headroom for future high-speed NVMe SSDs and GPUs.

The platform’s memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with ECC memory support. This is a professional feature that makes the platform suitable for workstations where data integrity is critical. The PCIe Gen 5 support is forward-looking, but the current Arc B570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The GPU has a TDP of 150W and a suggested PSU of 450W. This is a modest requirement, leaving ample headroom for the 35W CPU. A 450W PSU is sufficient for this entire system, even with other peripherals. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 91st percentile score means it can easily drive a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher without becoming a bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs will be fully compatible.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, built on a 5 nm process. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 18 RT cores. The GPU operates at a fixed 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate amount of VRAM, adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but potentially limiting for 4K textures. The memory bandwidth is a key metric for the GPU’s performance class, and it aligns with its 65th percentile ranking.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. These figures are competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is its nearest rival with a 0.1% delta. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad API compatibility.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844 indicate that the GPU is solid for DX12 and Vulkan titles. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 is modest, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 7,281 shows the GPU can handle compute tasks. The 18 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the low FP32 throughput suggests that ray-traced performance will be limited to lower resolutions and settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Therefore, all FPS figures here are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores and its nearest rivals.

The Arc B570’s 65th percentile rank and its similarity to the Intel Arc A750 (-0.1% delta) and NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% delta) suggest that in ultra settings at 1080p, the GPU can deliver playable frame rates in most titles. Expect 60-80 FPS in AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, and higher in less demanding titles. At 1440p, the frame rates will drop to 40-60 FPS in many games, requiring medium or high settings for a smooth experience.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is excellent, so in CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.52 TFLOPS are the key constraints. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU can push 100+ FPS, but the 10 GB VRAM may be a limitation for future titles that require more than 8 GB at high textures.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is of a CPU that is a top-tier performer and a GPU that is a solid mid-ranger. The Core Ultra 9 285T’s average benchmark score of 51,310 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. It beats the Intel Core i9-14900T by 0.6% and the Intel Core i7-13850HX by 1.1%, but trails the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.8%. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores are 33,573 multi-core and 4,739 single-core.

The Arc B570’s average benchmark score of 20,556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. It is nearly identical to the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% delta) and the Intel Arc A750 (-0.1% delta). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 2,649, and its PassMark G3D score is 14,195.

The combined percentile for this build is 78. This indicates that the system as a whole is in the top 22% of all desktop configurations, but the CPU is dramatically stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile is dragged down by the GPU’s 65th percentile. The data implies a system that is over-provisioned for CPU workloads and under-provisioned for GPU workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance tier relative to other processors?

A: The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51,310. It is 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i9-14900T and 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-13850HX.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The GPU is in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 20,556. It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% delta) and the Intel Arc A750 (-0.1% delta).

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 78, indicating it outperforms 78% of all desktop configurations.

Q: What is the CPU’s power draw and memory support?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and upgrade potential?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The platform is current, so future upgrades are limited to other Socket 1851 processors.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for a content creator or software developer who prioritizes CPU performance and needs a capable, but not top-tier, GPU for occasional gaming. The 24-core CPU is a powerhouse for video editing, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, and code compilation. The 35W TDP makes it excellent for a compact, low-noise workstation.

For gamers, this build is suited for 1080p gaming at high settings. The GPU’s 65th percentile rank means it can handle most titles, but users targeting 1440p or high refresh rates will find the GPU to be the limiting factor. The CPU’s strength ensures no frame drops in CPU-intensive scenarios, but the GPU will cap the maximum FPS.

For students and office workers, this is overkill, but the efficiency is a benefit. The system will handle any productivity task with ease, and the low TDP means lower electricity costs. For small business workstations, the ECC memory support is a significant advantage, ensuring data integrity in financial or scientific applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor, with the Intel Arc B570, a Battlemage-generation GPU. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 65th percentile. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper quartile of desktop PCs.

The pairing is unusual: a CPU with a 35W TDP and a GPU with a 150W TDP. This creates a system that is extremely efficient for CPU-bound tasks but has a GPU that is a generation or two behind the CPU’s performance class. The system is best characterized as a professional workstation with gaming capabilities, rather than a pure gaming rig. The CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded scores and the GPU’s modest scores indicate that the user is expected to spend more time rendering, compiling, or editing than gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds