SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and Intel Arc A770 pairing is a high-end desktop configuration that ranks in the 91st percentile overall, placing it firmly above most competing builds. The data shows a CPU that trades raw multi-threaded dominance for exceptional efficiency, paired with a GPU that offers formidable rasterization and ray tracing capabilities for its class. This is a balanced, premium-tier desktop build with distinct strengths in productivity and high-resolution gaming, though it requires careful consideration of its platform limitations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features a modest 1.40 GHz base clock that scales up to a 5.40 GHz boost clock, which is a significant dynamic range for a processor with a 35 W TDP. The lack of hyper-threading (24 threads for 24 cores) is a notable design choice that prioritizes power efficiency over sheer thread count. The cache hierarchy includes a 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a low-power chip.

In benchmark results, the CPU demonstrates strong single-core performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4739, which is competitive for modern workloads like gaming and lightly-threaded applications. Multi-core performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573, indicating that the 24 physical cores are well-utilized despite the absence of hyper-threading. The PassMark multi-thread score of 39931 and integer math score of 132433 confirm that this processor handles parallel tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering effectively. The floating-point math score of 137923 is particularly strong, suggesting solid performance in scientific and engineering simulations.

The CPU holds a 91st percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 51310. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T (avg score 51015) and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX (avg score 50761). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.8% (avg score 51730) and leads the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT by 1.2% (avg score 50718). These deltas are minimal, placing the 285T in a performance tier where architectural efficiency and power draw, rather than raw score, differentiate it from its rivals. For real workloads, the data suggests the 285T is ideal for multi-threaded content creation, software compilation, and heavy multitasking, all while maintaining a low thermal footprint that allows for compact cooling solutions.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using a 6 nm TSMC process, with the DG2-512 chip containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory operating at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The shader configuration includes 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, alongside 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1).

The A770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs. Its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which is forward-looking for high refresh rate monitors. Data from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows a score of 2969, while Geekbench scores are 109175 for OpenCL and 94284 for Vulkan, indicating strong compute and rendering performance. The GPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the A770 is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg score 69000) and 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870), while leading the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 by 0.4% (avg score 68562) and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 by 1.7% (avg score 69986). These figures indicate the A770 performs in the same league as professional workstation cards, albeit with consumer-focused feature sets. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K video editing, 3D modeling, and GPU-accelerated effects, while the 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the data does not quantify RT-specific performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system that excels in both CPU and GPU metrics. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14100 and R15 multi-core score of 3384 confirm its high throughput, while the single-core scores of 1990 (R20) and 477 (R15) reflect strong responsiveness. The PassMark suite further breaks down performance: data compression at 384140, data encryption at 32061, extended instructions at 27477, and find prime numbers at 345. The random string sorting score of 47695 and physics score of 2842 round out a comprehensive view of the CPU’s capabilities.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 and Geekbench scores (109175 OpenCL, 94284 Vulkan) show that it is a capable performer for gaming and compute tasks. When combined, the CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 90th percentile yield a combined percentile of 91, indicating that this pairing is well-matched in overall performance tier. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51310 and GPU’s 68809 suggest that the GPU contributes more raw compute throughput, but the CPU’s efficiency ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The data indicates that this is a system designed for high-fidelity gaming at 1440p or 4K, as well as for content creation workflows that leverage both multi-core CPUs and GPU acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285T uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, along with ECC memory support for enhanced stability in professional workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for the Arc A770’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck for the GPU. The platform is fresh, with the CPU released on 2025-01-06, but the GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its release date on 2022-10-11 and a successor in Battlemage.

The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and the CPU has a TDP of 35 W, creating a total thermal load that is manageable. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector setup, and it is a dual-slot card. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU has longevity due to its recent release and low power draw, while the GPU is at the end of its production cycle. Users could consider upgrading the GPU to a newer generation when available, as the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 20-lane configuration will support future high-bandwidth cards. The memory support for DDR5 and ECC also allows for future capacity increases without changing the motherboard. The platform’s power efficiency (35 W CPU TDP) means that existing PSUs with 550 W or higher ratings are unlikely to need replacement, making the GPU the primary upgrade target.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a balanced pairing, but with distinct workload-dependent dynamics. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile are close, indicating that neither component is drastically outclassed by the other. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data compression, the Core Ultra 9 285T’s scores (PassMark physics 2842, data compression 384140) will drive performance, and the GPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary determinant, with the CPU having sufficient headroom to feed the GPU.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that bottleneck analysis must rely on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core score of 4739 (Cinebench R23) is high enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games, as modern titles typically require single-core scores above 4000 for smooth performance with high-end GPUs. The GPU’s pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s suggest it can handle high resolutions without being starved by the CPU. However, in multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 24 threads may be a limiting factor compared to rivals with hyper-threading, but the data shows it remains competitive. The 1.2% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT in CPU benchmarks indicates that the 285T is not a bottleneck in mixed workloads, and the GPU’s 0.3% gap behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX shows it is similarly well-positioned. Overall, the system is balanced, with the GPU being the slight bottleneck in gaming and the CPU in heavy multi-threaded compute, but neither is a severe constraint.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which are the primary APIs for modern games. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for high-resolution textures and 4K gaming, where memory capacity is often a limiting factor on lesser cards.

Estimated gaming performance suggests that at 1080p, the CPU’s single-core strength (Cinebench R23 score 4739) will allow the GPU to reach high frame rates in esports titles, likely exceeding 144 fps in competitive shooters, though this is an estimate. At 1440p, the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance should deliver 60-100 fps in AAA titles with high settings, based on its percentile ranking relative to similar cards. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, but the GPU’s 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate may limit frame rates to 30-60 fps in demanding games. Ray tracing performance, supported by 32 RT cores, is expected to be moderate, with playable frame rates at 1080p with DLSS-like upscaling (though the data does not specify upscaling support). The CPU’s 35 W TDP and boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensure it will not throttle during extended gaming sessions, maintaining consistent performance. These figures are estimates only, as the data is not measured for this exact pairing.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a high-performance desktop for both productivity and gaming without excessive power consumption. The CPU’s 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache make it ideal for content creators, including video editors who use multi-threaded encoding (evidenced by a PassMark data compression score of 384140) and 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573). Software developers and students in computer science will benefit from the CPU’s strong integer math (132433) and extended instructions (27477) for compilation and algorithm testing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and Vulkan support (Geekbench Vulkan score 94284) make it suitable for game developers targeting modern APIs, as well as for machine learning inference tasks requiring large memory footprints.

For gamers, this build is best suited for 1440p and 4K gaming at high settings, where the GPU’s bandwidth and VRAM are fully utilized, and the CPU’s single-core performance ensures high frame rates. Small business workstations that run financial modeling, database management, or CAD software will find the CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score 109175) sufficient for daily tasks. The low TDP of both components (35 W CPU, 225 W GPU) makes this a viable option for users in warm environments or those seeking quieter operation with smaller coolers, though the data does not specify cooler requirements. The build is not targeted at extreme overclockers, as the CPU’s multiplier is locked, but it offers a stable, high-performance platform for professional and enthusiast use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and Intel Arc A770. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake, and the GPU is from the Alchemist (Arc 7) generation. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, and the GPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 91. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51310, and the GPU’s is 68809, indicating that the GPU provides more raw compute throughput. This pairing is a high-tier desktop configuration that excels in multi-threaded workloads and high-resolution gaming, with the CPU’s exceptional efficiency (35 W TDP) complementing the GPU’s substantial power draw (225 W TDP, 550 W suggested PSU). The platform is forward-looking with PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory, but the GPU is end-of-life, making this a build that is powerful today with potential for a future GPU upgrade. The data confirms this is a well-balanced, high-performance desktop for demanding users.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and Intel Arc A770 is 91, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285T compare to the Intel Core i9-14900T in benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51310, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T’s average score of 51015.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A770, and how much VRAM does it have?

A: The Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Arc A770?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A770 is 550 W, and it requires a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector setup.

Q: What are the CPU’s clock speeds and TDP?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Is the Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life, with its release date on 2022-10-11 and a successor named Battlemage.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds