SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + Intel Arc A580: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 35 W Arrow Lake flagship CPU with the 175 W Arc A580 GPU, creating a desktop build that sits at the 89th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU holds a 91st percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a system built around efficiency and broad capability, but the data reveals a significant performance imbalance that shapes every workload discussed below.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2 family. This socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that require data integrity. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes directly from the processor, while the Arc A580 GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the GPU will operate at the older standard but with sufficient bandwidth for its class.

The CPU's 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for a 24-core processor, and the Arc A580's 175 W TDP brings the total system draw to a manageable level. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 450 W, which provides a sensible baseline for the entire system. Given the low CPU power draw, a 450 W power supply would leave headroom for the rest of the platform components, though users adding multiple storage drives or peripheral cards would want to consider the total system load. The power connectors on the GPU are 2x 8-pin, which is standard for this performance class.

A sensible next upgrade path from this build would focus on the GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The Arc A580 is the weaker link in this pairing, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the interface. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support is sufficient for most workloads, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is modest compared to higher-end platforms. Users looking to extend the life of this build could also consider adding more DDR5 memory, as the platform supports standard dual-channel configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T demonstrates strong multi-core performance in the Cinebench suite. The R23 multi-core score of 33573 places the CPU in a competitive position, while the single-core score of 4739 indicates solid per-thread performance. The R20 results show 14100 multi-core and 1990 single-core, and the R15 tests yield 3384 multi-core and 477 single-core. These scores suggest a processor that handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads with consistent capability.

The PassMark results paint a broader picture. The multithread score of 39931 and single-thread score of 4576 align with the Cinebench findings. Integer math scores 132433, floating-point math scores 137923, and extended instructions score 27477. Data compression reaches 384140, while data encryption hits 32061. Random string sorting scores 47695, and find prime numbers scores 345. The physics test scores 2842. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at a wide range of computational tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51310, which places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T, scores 51015, putting the Ultra 9 285T just 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730, which is 0.8% higher. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761, 1.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718, 1.2% behind. This tight grouping shows that the Ultra 9 285T sits squarely in the upper-midrange of desktop processors, trading blows with previous-generation flagship chips.

The Intel Arc A580 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 91657 and the Vulkan score is 79381. The GPU's average benchmark score is 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, scores 58085, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367, 0.7% lower. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58239, 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392, 1.1% higher. The GPU sits in a competitive mid-range tier, but the delta to some rivals is notable.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms most processors but a GPU that, while above average, does not match the CPU's relative standing. The 89th combined percentile reflects this mismatch, as the pairing's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's lower percentile position.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 91st percentile rank versus the GPU's 87th percentile rank indicates that the processor is the stronger component. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will typically be the limiting factor, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the graphics card without becoming a constraint. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4739 in R23 supports this, as gaming performance often depends on single-thread capability.

Conversely, in compute-heavy workloads such as 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance. The Arc A580's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance are respectable for its class, but the CPU's multi-core scores of 33573 in R23 and 39931 in PassMark multithread suggest that CPU-bound tasks will see a larger performance delta from this pairing. The GPU's 175 W TDP and 8 GB VRAM also limit its ability to handle very large datasets or high-resolution textures in professional applications.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not directly measured for this pairing, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at lower resolutions, the Ultra 9 285T's strong single-core performance would allow the GPU to reach its maximum output. In GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the Arc A580 would become the bottleneck, limiting frame rates regardless of the CPU's capability. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads provide substantial parallel processing power, which benefits productivity workloads but does not directly translate to higher FPS in games that cannot utilize that many threads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps values for any game or resolution, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 87th percentile provide a reference point for expected performance.

Based on the CPU's strong single-core score of 4739 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229, this pairing should handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The Arc A580's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 1440p gaming, though 1440p would require more careful settings adjustments. The GPU's 24 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that ray tracing at high resolutions would be demanding.

At 1080p, the CPU would not be the limiting factor in most games, given its high single-thread performance. The GPU would likely deliver playable frame rates in competitive titles and moderate settings in AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU's performance would drop, and users would need to reduce settings to maintain smooth gameplay. At 4K, this pairing would struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute performance would be insufficient. The data suggests this is a 1080p-first gaming system, with 1440p possible at reduced settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core strength supports high frame rates, but the GPU's 87th percentile rank limits overall FPS. At 1080p, this pairing could achieve high refresh rates in esports titles, but AAA games would likely hover around 60-100 FPS depending on settings. The GPU's 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate are solid for 1080p throughput.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores provide ample encoding headroom for software-based streaming. The 33573 R23 multi-core score indicates that simultaneous gaming and encoding would not strain the processor. The GPU's 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance also supports hardware-accelerated encoding tasks, though the Intel Arc software ecosystem is less mature than rivals.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with 384140 in data compression and 137923 in floating-point math. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 assists with effects and rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit timeline complexity. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache helps with large project files.

3D rendering: The CPU's 33573 R23 multi-core score is excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance is mid-range. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads accelerate compilation and testing. The 132433 integer math score supports build processes, while the 32061 data encryption score handles cryptographic operations. The ECC memory support is valuable for development servers or long-running builds.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's 35 W TDP makes it efficient for daily use, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 477 R15 single-core score ensures snappy application responsiveness.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is connected via a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming but becomes a constraint at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS places it in the mid-range tier, while the FP16 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) supports AI-assisted workloads. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the overall compute density is not sufficient for heavy ray tracing loads.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 places the GPU at the 87th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, scores 0.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 0.7% lower. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 indicate strong compute performance for its class. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting high refresh rate monitors.

The GPU's 175 W TDP and dual-slot design require a 450 W PSU, which is modest for this performance class. The 2x 8-pin power connectors are standard. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs, though the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU upgrade would have access to newer standards.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance and efficiency over raw GPU power. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings would find this system capable, especially in competitive titles where the CPU's strong single-core performance shines. The GPU's 87th percentile rank ensures playable frame rates, but users seeking 1440p or 4K gaming would need to consider a more powerful GPU.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development would benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 33573 R23 multi-core score. The ECC memory support is an advantage for professionals who require data integrity. The 35 W TDP makes this an efficient choice for long-running workloads, keeping power consumption low while maintaining high throughput.

Students and small business users would find this build more powerful than necessary for typical office tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity. The integrated graphics provide a fallback, and the 35 W CPU TDP means lower electricity costs. The 89th combined percentile reflects a system that is above average overall, but users should understand the CPU-heavy balance before purchasing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 89th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile.

Q: How does the Ultra 9 285T compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51310, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T's 51015 and 1.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT's 50718, but 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900F's 51730.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data-integrity-focused builds.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The Arc A580 has a suggested PSU of 450 W, and it uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. The GPU's TDP is 175 W, while the CPU's TDP is 35 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What socket does the CPU use and what PCIe generation does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes directly from the processor. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 1.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 35 W TDP is notably low for a processor with this core count, making it an efficiency-focused flagship. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 demonstrates strong parallel performance, while the single-core score of 4739 shows excellent per-thread capability. The R20 scores of 14100 multi-core and 1990 single-core follow the same pattern, as do the R15 scores of 3384 multi-core and 477 single-core. The PassMark multithread score of 39931 and single-thread score of 4576 corroborate these results. The data compression score of 384140 and integer math score of 132433 are particularly strong, indicating robust general-purpose compute.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51310 places it at the 91st percentile. The nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the i9-14900T at 0.6% lower, the i7-13850HX at 1.1% lower, and the Ryzen 9 5900XT at 1.2% lower. Only the i9-13900F scores higher at 0.8% above. This suggests the Ultra 9 285T delivers performance comparable to previous-generation flagship desktop processors while consuming significantly less power. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is high for a 35 W part, indicating Intel has tuned this chip for efficiency without sacrificing peak performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake flagship with the mid-range Arc A580 GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile rank and the GPU's 87th percentile rank combine to place the system at the 89th combined percentile. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-midrange, with the CPU punching above its class and the GPU matching its class expectations.

The defining characteristic of this pairing is the significant CPU advantage. The Ultra 9 285T's 35 W TDP and strong multi-core performance make it an excellent choice for productivity workloads, while the Arc A580's 8 GB VRAM and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle gaming at 1080p with moderate settings. The system is balanced toward compute-heavy tasks rather than high-end gaming, and users should calibrate their expectations accordingly. The 89th combined percentile reflects a system that outperforms most builds in the database, but the GPU remains the limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.