SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is a desktop configuration that combines a flagship 24-core processor with a mid-range Ampere graphics card. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all processors, while the GPU rests at the 50th percentile, creating a significant performance disparity. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark data to examine the pairing, with the explicit caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, making all gaming performance figures estimates derived from component-level scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm TSMC process. It houses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and the CPU has a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth and includes ECC memory support. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU and integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results show a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 42,522 points in multi-core and 2,377 in single-core. The R20 results are 24,003 multi-core and 3,388 single-core, while R15 shows 6,494 multi-core and 359 single-core. Geekbench reports 26,702 multi-core and 2,870 single-core. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 790,052, data encryption 57,745, extended instructions 62,277, floating point math 224,324, integer math 172,379, multithread 67,260, physics 3,938, and random string sorting 94,927. The single-thread PassMark score is 5,087.

The average benchmark score is 83,807, placing the CPU at the 96th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus with an average score of 84,003 (-0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83,090 (+0.9%), the AMD EPYC 9135 at 82,980 (+1%), and the AMD EPYC 7F72 at 85,072 (-1.5%). This indicates the 285K performs essentially on par with the 290K Plus, slightly ahead of the EPYC 4584PX and 9135, and slightly behind the EPYC 7F72. The 24 threads (matching core count, no hyperthreading) mean the chip relies on physical cores, yet its multi-core scores are competitive with server-class EPYC processors in the same score band.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 suggests heavy rendering tasks will complete quickly. The PassMark physics score of 3,938 indicates strong simulation performance, while the encryption score of 57,745 and compression score of 790,052 point to rapid data handling. Single-core performance, evidenced by the R23 score of 2,377 and Geekbench single-core of 2,870, is robust for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 3 nm process and 125 W TDP suggest efficient power delivery relative to the performance on offer.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning no hyperthreading; each core handles one thread. This is reflected in the 17,800 million transistor design on a 243 mm² die.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The 285K averages 83,807 points versus the 290K Plus’s 84,003, a delta of -0.2%. This is effectively a tie, with the 285K trailing by less than one percent in average benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true. The processor uses DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Core Ultra 9 285K?

A: The boost clock is 5.70 GHz, while the base clock is 3.70 GHz. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which is 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU uses an 8 nm process by Samsung. The CPU’s die size is 243 mm² with 17,800 million transistors, and the GPU’s die is 392 mm² with 17,400 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, indicating the pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations. The CPU alone is at the 96th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, and the memory bus provides 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, enabling fast connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU provides a basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles heavy graphics work.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The GPU’s TDP is 220 W, and it draws power from a single 8-pin connector. The card is triple-slot, measuring 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The CPU’s 125 W TDP combined with the GPU’s 220 W TDP means the 550 W power supply suggestion accounts for the graphics card alone, but the total system draw will be higher; a PSU with adequate headroom for both components is advisable, though specific combined wattage figures are not provided.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU is near the top of the processor hierarchy. The data shows the CPU at the 96th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th. Replacing the RTX 3070 TiM with a higher-tier card would better match the CPU’s capabilities. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible with newer GPUs that may use PCIe 5.0, though the CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for other devices. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on the GPU is a potential bottleneck for high-resolution textures, so a GPU with more memory would be a logical upgrade. The platform itself supports DDR5, so increasing memory capacity or speed is possible, though specific speed ratings are not listed.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 5,087 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,377 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB memory limit may constrain frame rates at higher resolutions. The pairing is likely capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming, with the GPU being the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 67,260 and extended instructions score of 62,277 suggest the 285K can handle simultaneous gameplay, encoding, and broadcast tasks without significant performance drops. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 184 tensor cores also support hardware encoding acceleration.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 and Geekbench multi-core of 26,702 indicate fast rendering and export times. The PassMark data compression score of 790,052 helps with codec operations. The GPU’s 8 GB memory may limit complex effects or 4K timelines, but the CPU’s processing power is more than sufficient for most editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 cores deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 24,003, which is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 46 RT cores provide acceleration for GPU-rendered scenes, though the 8 GB memory is a constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,870) and multi-thread capabilities (PassMark integer math 172,379) are well-suited for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth facilitate rapid code execution. The GPU is adequate for general development, with 8 GB memory sufficient for most testing scenarios.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s 24 threads and 5.70 GHz boost clock ensure zero lag in productivity apps. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is underutilized. The 125 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP mean higher power draw than typical office machines, but performance is never a concern.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 73 reflects a pairing where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU. The Core Ultra 9 285K is at the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 3070 TiM is at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This 46-point gap indicates the CPU is the dominant component and the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 50th percentile score suggest it will limit frame rates, especially at higher resolutions or with demanding textures. The CPU’s performance headroom means it will not be the constraining factor in most scenarios.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compression, and encryption, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The PassMark multithread score of 67,260 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 42,522 show the 285K excels, and the GPU’s role is secondary. In mixed workloads like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the task; rendering uses the CPU, while effects and previews may leverage the GPU. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 184 tensor cores provide acceleration, but the 8 GB memory can cause bottlenecks with large datasets. The 448.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth is respectable, but the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is a fraction of that, creating a potential data transfer bottleneck if the CPU must feed the GPU rapidly. The lack of measured FPS data means these bottlenecks are inferred from component scores rather than observed performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM combination. The FACT PACK confirms there are no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU’s 96th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile suggest the GPU will dictate gaming performance in most titles. The RTX 3070 TiM has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 1410 MHz. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory at 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is a moderate amount for modern games.

At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 5,087 in PassMark and 2,377 in Cinebench R23 single-core should allow the GPU to reach its maximum potential, with the GPU likely being the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB memory may struggle with high-texture settings, potentially causing frame drops. At 4K, the GPU is likely insufficient for ultra settings, but the CPU’s performance ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks. Given the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, frame rates are expected to be mid-range for its generation, but the CPU’s 96th percentile means it will never hold the system back. The 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance is moderate, and the 46 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing, but the 8 GB memory is the most likely constraint. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p will benefit from the CPU’s exceptional single-thread scores, ensuring high frame rates even if the GPU limits maximum FPS. Those at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU is the weak link, so this build suits gamers who plan to upgrade the GPU later. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU’s 24 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 for fast exports and renders, with the GPU providing acceleration for effects and previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 172,379 and the 36 MB L3 cache. Students and office workers will find the system massively overqualified, but the 96th percentile CPU ensures longevity. Small business workstations handling data compression (PassMark 790,052) or encryption (57,745) will see significant throughput, though the GPU’s 8 GB memory is not a concern for these tasks. The build is best suited for those who run CPU-intensive workloads and game at 1080p or plan a GPU upgrade.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-architecture GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The CPU is the flagship of the Core Ultra Series 2, released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, currently end-of-life, succeeding the GeForce 20 and preceding the GeForce 40. The combined percentile is 73, placing this pairing above most configurations but below the top quarter. The CPU’s 96th percentile is elite, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is average, resulting in an overall tier that is high-end for processing but mid-range for graphics.

The build class is desktop, and the platform uses DDR5 memory with PCIe Gen 5 support. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 220 W TDP require a substantial power supply, with the suggested PSU for the GPU being 550 W. The GPU is a triple-slot card at 270 mm length, requiring a spacious case. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pairing is conceptually strong for productivity, but the GPU’s 50th percentile score means it is not a balanced gaming rig at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 83,807, placing it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus at 84,003 (-0.2%), AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83,090 (+0.9%), AMD EPYC 9135 at 82,980 (+1%), and AMD EPYC 7F72 at 85,072 (-1.5%). The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and an average score of 0, but its percentile is 50. The combined percentile is 73.

Specific CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core 42,522 and single-core 2,377; Cinebench R20 multi-core 24,003 and single-core 3,388; Cinebench R15 multi-core 6,494 and single-core 359; Geekbench multi-core 26,702 and single-core 2,870. PassMark tests show multithread 67,260, single-thread 5,087, data compression 790,052, data encryption 57,745, extended instructions 62,277, find prime numbers 541, floating point math 224,324, integer math 172,379, physics 3,938, and random string sorting 94,927. The GPU’s specifications include 16.60 TFLOPS FP32, 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate, and a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms server-class EPYC processors in its score band, with a GPU that is average. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 is nearly double the single-core score of 2,377, indicating massive multi-thread scaling. The GPU’s 8 GB memory and 50th percentile mean it is not in the same performance tier as the CPU. Benchmark results indicate this pairing is compute-heavy, with the CPU providing most of the system’s overall capability. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is an estimate, but the component scores suggest a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and is adequate for 1080p gaming.