SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor in the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake and designed for Intel Socket 1851. It brings 24 cores, 24 threads, DDR5 memory support, ECC capability, and a 96th-percentile standing among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 83807. The Intel Arc B770 is a Battlemage-generation GPU using the Xe2-HPG architecture, equipped with 16GB of GDDR6 and listed at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined desktop build sits at the 73rd percentile overall. This pairing is heavily CPU-skewed, and the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means any gaming performance discussion has to be treated as an estimate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1851, which pairs with the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The Core Ultra 9 285K is an active, unlocked part, so the CPU itself is not a locked-down choice for builders who want to adjust clocks. The memory path is DDR5 only, running on a dual-channel interface with a listed bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation-style builds where data integrity is a priority. The CPU also includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU solution, meaning the system can fall back to integrated graphics if the discrete GPU is removed or during troubleshooting.

On the expansion side, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The Arc B770, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, so the GPU will run on the PCIe 4.0 path rather than consuming CPU Gen 5 lanes directly. Builders should still account for the motherboard and other devices when planning how to use the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, since the CPU only exposes 20 of them.

Power planning is straightforward. The CPU is rated at 125 W TDP, and the GPU is rated at 225 W TDP. The Arc B770's suggested PSU is 550 W, which gives a clear reference point for the minimum power supply size in this build. The B770 uses two power connectors, one 6-pin and one 8-pin, and the card is a dual-slot design, so physical clearance and connector availability matter.

The most sensible next upgrade, based on the data, is not the CPU. The Core Ultra 9 285K already sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, so most workloads that move frames or compute data will not be starved by the processor. The Arc B770, in contrast, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no benchmark rows and no nearest rivals listed. That makes the GPU the obvious component to replace if the user wants more graphics performance. Memory can also be expanded within the DDR5 dual-channel framework, and the ECC support gives the platform headroom for more reliability-oriented configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark data is extensive. In Cinebench R15, the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 6494 multi-core and 359 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 24003 multi-core and 3388 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42522 multi-core and 2377 single-core. Geekbench results are 26702 multi-core and 2870 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 67260, a single-thread result of 5087, integer math at 172379, floating-point math at 224324, data compression at 790052, data encryption at 57745, extended instructions at 62277, random string sorting at 94927, prime number finding at 541, and physics at 3938. These numbers combine into an average benchmark score of 83807, placing the CPU at the 96th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rival data reinforces the CPU's positioning. The closest listed rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, has an average score of 84003 with a deltaPct of -0.2. The AMD EPYC 4584PX scores 83090 with a deltaPct of 0.9. The AMD EPYC 9135 scores 82980 with a deltaPct of 1. The AMD EPYC 7F72 scores 85072 with a deltaPct of -1.5. The deltaPct values range from -1.5 to 1, so the Core Ultra 9 285K sits in a tight cluster with all four of these rivals. None of them is far ahead or far behind in the database's comparison metric.

The GPU side is much less populated. The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearestRivals list. Its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, which is the only performance-classification number the database provides for this GPU. The combined build percentile is 73, sitting between the CPU's 96 and the GPU's 50. That is the clearest picture of this pairing: a top-tier processor carrying a mid-tier GPU into the upper-middle portion of the database.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 285K is built on Arrow Lake, with a 3 nm process from TSMC. The die is 243 mm² and contains 17,800 million transistors. It uses 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The cache layout includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class part with a 125 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier.

The benchmark results show a processor that is strong in both multi-threaded and single-threaded work. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 42522 is a high absolute score, and it is backed by the Passmark multithread result of 67260. Single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2377, Geekbench single-core at 2870, and Passmark single-thread at 5087. The 5.70 GHz boost clock is reflected in those single-thread results. The CPU's 96th percentile overall ranking means it is above the vast majority of processors in the database.

The extra Passmark workloads add context beyond synthetic render tests. Integer math at 172379 is useful for general compute and compilation workloads. Data compression at 790052 points to strong performance in archiving, file manipulation, and similar I/O-heavy compute tasks. Data encryption at 57745 is a solid result for security-related workloads. Floating-point math at 224324 supports scientific and simulation workloads. The CPU's 24 threads provide enough parallelism for rendering, encoding, and heavy multitasking, while the high single-thread score keeps latency-sensitive tasks responsive.

Who Should Build It

This build should appeal to users who need a very strong CPU and are willing to pair it with a mid-tier GPU. The data shows a CPU at the 96th percentile and a GPU at the 50th percentile, so the user base is not primarily GPU-first gamers. Instead, it suits content creators, developers, students, and small business workstation builders who value CPU throughput and also need a modern discrete GPU for acceleration and display output.

For gamers, the build is better suited to high-refresh competitive scenarios where the CPU's high single-thread score matters, rather than to maximising quality in the most demanding titles. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so resolution-specific claims cannot be made from the database. Still, the CPU side is not going to be the limiting factor for most gaming scenarios.

Content creators benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and multi-core scores. Video editing, rendering, and batch processing workloads that use parallel CPU threads will have plenty of headroom. The Arc B770's 16GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth add useful GPU memory capacity for larger textures and frames, though the GPU itself sits at only the 50th percentile.

Developers and students working on compilation, data analysis, or simulation workloads can lean on the CPU's integer math score of 172379 and data compression score of 790052. ECC memory support is also relevant for longer-running data-processing tasks where memory errors are undesirable. Small business workstations can use the same strengths for office productivity, database tasks, and moderate GPU acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most unbalanced point in this pairing is the gap between CPU and GPU percentile. The Core Ultra 9 285K sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B770 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. In gaming, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck because the processor has a much higher ranking and far more benchmark data supporting that ranking. The lack of measured FPS scaling rows for this exact combination means the database cannot show how frame rates scale with settings between the CPU and GPU. The available evidence is the percentile gap, not measured frame data.

In CPU-heavy workloads, the balance is reversed. The CPU's high multi-core scores and 24 threads mean it will not be the limiting component in rendering, encoding, or compilation tasks. The GPU may still contribute in GPU-accelerated workloads, but its 50th percentile rank suggests it will not push far beyond mid-tier expectations. The combined percentile of 73 reflects that mixed position: the CPU drags the system upward, while the GPU keeps it from reaching the top tier.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS expectations in this section are estimates from the available benchmark scores, not measured results.

The CPU-side material for gaming is strong. A 96th-percentile CPU with a Passmark single-thread score of 5087 and a 5.70 GHz boost clock should be able to feed frames without holding back the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU side is less clearly defined because it has no benchmark entries. The Arc B770's 50th percentile rank, 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 RT cores define its architectural capability. Memory bandwidth is 512.0 GB/s, backed by a 256-bit bus and 16GB of GDDR6. Raw FP32 throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS.

The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so modern game APIs are covered. The GPU should be able to handle high-refresh esports titles and medium-to-high settings in more demanding games, but those expectations are estimates. The CPU is unlikely to be the cause of low frame rates in this build; the GPU, given its 50th percentile position, is the more probable limiter.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is a 96th-percentile part with a single-thread Passmark score of 5087, so CPU-driven frame generation should be strong. The Arc B770 is only at the 50th percentile on the GPU side, so frame rates in gaming will likely be GPU-limited. All gaming expectations are estimates because no measured FPS exists.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 provide enough parallel headroom to handle a game plus background encoding and streaming tasks. The 125 W CPU TDP also leaves power room in a 550 W suggested PSU system.

Video editing: The combination of a strong multi-core CPU and 16GB of GDDR6 GPU memory supports timeline editing, effects work, and exports. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 67260 and the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are the relevant figures.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 42522 and Passmark floating-point math at 224324 make this a capable CPU rendering system. The GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores also provide hardware acceleration for renderers that use DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan 1.4.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads, integer math score of 172379, and data compression score of 790052 support frequent compilation, test runs, and dependency management. ECC memory support is useful for long-running validation tasks.

Student and office work: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU means the system has a display output solution even without the discrete GPU. DDR5 dual-channel memory at 102.4 GB/s and ECC support provide a solid foundation for everyday productivity and more serious coursework.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, matching the buildClass field in the data. It combines the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor, with the Intel Arc B770, a Battlemage-generation GPU based on Xe2-HPG. The CPU is an active part with an unlocked multiplier and a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

The overall tier of this build comes from the percentiles. The CPU is at the 96th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 73, placing the system in the upper-middle portion of the database. This is not a balanced build; it is a CPU-dominant desktop system with a mid-tier GPU attached. The platform has strong memory, storage, and expansion fundamentals, but the GPU is the component that will hold back graphically demanding workloads.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What memory support does the CPU offer?

A: It supports DDR5 with a dual-channel interface, 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: How much cache does the Core Ultra 9 285K have?

A: It has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B770 have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the GPU has 32 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame data is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The average benchmark score is 83807, and it sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Arc B770?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W. The GPU is rated at 225 W TDP, and the CPU is rated at 125 W TDP.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds