SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + Intel Arc A750: A Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship Arrow Lake desktop processor with Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc A750 graphics card, creating a desktop build that ranks in the 81st combined percentile. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a substantial performance gap between the two components. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 family and carries the Ultra 9 generation label. The chip integrates 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 per core. ECC memory support is present, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. An integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU unit is included, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in elite territory. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 42522 and single-core score of 2377 demonstrate strong performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 26702 multi-core and 2870 single-core reinforce this picture. The average benchmark score of 83807 places the 285K in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 96% of processors in the database. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, scores 84003, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 285K trails by just 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 7F72 scores 85072, putting the 285K 1.5% behind, while the AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83090 and AMD EPYC 9135 at 82980 are 0.9% and 1% behind respectively.

PassMark results show specialized strengths. The data compression score of 790052 and data encryption score of 57745 indicate robust throughput for storage and security workloads. Floating point math at 224324 and integer math at 172379 show balanced arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 62277 suggests strong SIMD and vector processing. The multi-thread score of 67260 reinforces the CPU's multi-core dominance, while the single-thread score of 5087 confirms it remains competitive in lightly threaded tasks. The physics score of 3938 and find prime numbers score of 541 provide additional reference points for computational intensity.

For real workloads, these numbers translate into excellent performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and other parallel tasks where all 24 threads can be utilized. The single-core performance ensures responsive everyday use and solid gaming performance in titles that rely on fewer threads. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s supports data-intensive workloads without becoming a bottleneck, though the dual-channel configuration limits absolute memory throughput compared to some HEDT platforms.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The GPU contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². It belongs to the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 7 tier, and carries a base clock of 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across an 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU features 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores specifically designed for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 17.20 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 34.41 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The card consumes up to 225 W TDP, requires a 550 W suggested PSU, and draws power through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A750 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631. PassMark results show a G3D score of 12534, G2D score of 732, and GPU compute score of 5368. Legacy DirectX tests show lower scores: DirectX 9 at 181, DirectX 10 at 65, DirectX 11 at 72, and DirectX 12 at 70. The average benchmark score of 20582 places this GPU in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rivals show how tightly clustered this performance tier is. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, a delta of 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.2% behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, putting the A750 0.4% behind, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.5% behind. These deltas indicate the A750 sits in a competitive mid-range performance band where small differences separate models.

The 8 GB VRAM with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, though the 8 GB capacity may limit texture quality in the most demanding titles. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT capability, though performance in RT-heavy workloads will be moderate given the GPU's overall tier. The FP16 throughput at 34.41 TFLOPS suggests reasonable compute capability for tasks like AI inference and certain creative workloads, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means this is general-purpose compute rather than specialized AI acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a CPU that is dramatically stronger than its GPU counterpart. The Core Ultra 9 285K's average benchmark score of 83807 sits in the 96th CPU percentile, while the Arc A750's average score of 20582 places it in the 66th GPU percentile. The overall build combined percentile is 81, reflecting the CPU's dominance in pulling the system upward while the GPU limits the ceiling.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU's multi-core score of 42522 represents strong multi-threaded performance, likely placing it among the top desktop processors for rendering workloads. The single-core score of 2377 indicates it can handle lightly threaded tasks with ease. Geekbench multi-core at 26702 and single-core at 2870 provide cross-platform reference points. The PassMark multi-thread score of 67260 and single-thread score of 5087 confirm the CPU's balanced capability across thread counts.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 indicate solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 places it in the mid-range tier. The GPU compute score of 5368 shows moderate compute throughput, which is expected given the FP32 rating of 17.20 TFLOPS.

The CPU's nearest rivals all fall within a 1.5% range, indicating the 285K is at the top of its performance class. The 0.2% gap to the Ultra 9 290K Plus is negligible in real-world terms. The GPU's rivals similarly cluster within 0.5%, showing the A750 competes closely with several other mid-range options. The combined 81st percentile indicates this build outperforms the majority of systems in the database, though the GPU prevents it from reaching the very top tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a scenario where the processor will frequently outpace the graphics card in GPU-bound workloads. In gaming, the Arc A750 will be the limiting factor at most resolutions, as the CPU can easily feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 67260 and single-thread score of 5087 indicate it can handle even CPU-intensive game logic and physics without becoming the constraint.

In compute and productivity workloads, the balance shifts. Tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation that leverage the CPU's 24 threads will see the processor as the dominant factor, with the GPU contributing only where applicable. The CPU's data compression score of 790052 and floating point math score of 224324 suggest it will excel in these scenarios. The GPU's compute capabilities, while moderate at 5368 in PassMark GPU compute, are secondary to the CPU's raw processing power in most non-gaming workloads.

The FPS scaling in gaming will be governed almost entirely by the GPU. The Arc A750's 66th percentile position means it delivers mid-range frame rates, while the CPU's 96th percentile ensures it never becomes the bottleneck. This creates a system where upgrading the GPU in the future would yield significant gaming performance gains without requiring a CPU change. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A750's 66th GPU percentile and the Core Ultra 9 285K's 96th CPU percentile provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should support smooth frame rates in most titles, though the 66th percentile position suggests mid-range performance rather than high-end. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates DirectX 12 games will run reasonably well, while the Vulkan score of 85631 suggests Vulkan titles may perform better. The CPU's single-thread score of 5087 ensures that even CPU-heavy games like simulation titles or real-time strategy games will not be processor-limited at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU will be under more pressure as pixel count increases. The 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in the most demanding titles, potentially requiring reduced texture settings. The 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides enough raw power for playable frame rates, but users should expect medium-to-high settings rather than maximum in the latest releases. The CPU will remain fully capable, with its 96th percentile ensuring no processor bottleneck.

At 4K, the Arc A750 will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings. The 66th percentile GPU ranking suggests this resolution is beyond the card's optimal range. Users seeking 4K gaming would need to lower settings significantly or consider a more powerful GPU. The CPU's performance is not the limiting factor here; the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute throughput are the primary constraints.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 96th percentile and single-thread score of 5087 ensure it can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 66th percentile limits the system to mid-range performance. At 1080p, 144 Hz monitors may be achievable in less demanding titles, but the GPU will cap performance in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and multi-thread score of 67260 provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers a fallback for display output, while the discrete GPU handles rendering. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports smooth multitasking.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 and PassMark integer math score of 172379 indicate strong performance for video encoding and processing. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute can accelerate effects and rendering in compatible software, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit complex projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 42522 Cinebench R23 score and 26702 Geekbench multi-core score, makes this system excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 compute and 28 ray tracing cores provide acceleration in GPU-rendered scenes, though the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads and strong integer math score of 172379 support parallel compilation and testing. The data encryption score of 57745 and extended instructions score of 62277 indicate capability for security-related development work. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 5087 ensures responsive everyday use, while the 96th percentile ranking means this system far exceeds typical office requirements. The GPU's capabilities are largely unnecessary for these workloads, but the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a power-efficient alternative for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to accept mid-range GPU capabilities. Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles or are willing to adjust settings will find the Arc A750 sufficient, while the CPU ensures no processor bottleneck at any setting. Those planning to upgrade the GPU later will benefit from the CPU's 96th percentile, which provides years of headroom for more powerful graphics cards.

Content creators focused on CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the 24-thread processor excellent, with the GPU providing moderate acceleration for GPU-accelerated features. The 8 GB VRAM may require working within texture memory limits, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this.

Developers building large codebases will appreciate the CPU's multi-thread score of 67260 and integer math score of 172379, which accelerate compilation and testing. The ECC memory support provides stability for long-running compute tasks. Students in engineering, computer science, or creative fields will find the system far exceeds requirements, though the GPU's mid-range nature means it is not ideal for gaming-focused builds at higher resolutions.

Small business workstations handling data processing, virtualization, or database workloads will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 790052 and data encryption score of 57745. The 96th CPU percentile ensures this system can handle demanding professional applications without compromise, while the GPU provides adequate graphics for visualization tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285K uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide substantial bandwidth for high-speed storage and graphics cards, though the Arc A750 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and does not fully utilize the Gen 5 capability.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 550 W and 225 W TDP indicate the current power delivery is modest. The CPU's 125 W TDP adds to the total system draw, so users with higher-wattage power supplies have headroom for future upgrades. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage, suggesting an upgrade to a newer Intel GPU or a competing product would be the natural path for improved gaming performance.

The CPU's 96th percentile and the platform's modern features—DDR5, PCIe Gen 5, ECC support—mean the processor will remain relevant for several years. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to balance the system, as the CPU's performance headroom is substantial. The 550 W suggested PSU provides guidance for future GPU selection, though users should verify their specific power supply capacity before upgrading.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K ranks in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 83807.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has an average score of 20582, placing it 0.1% behind the Intel Arc B570, 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined build percentile is 81, reflecting the CPU's high performance and the GPU's mid-range position.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU pairing in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A750 is 550 W, with the GPU consuming up to 225 W TDP.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 96th CPU percentile, with the Intel Arc A750, an Alchemist-generation GPU with a 66th GPU percentile. The combined build percentile of 81 places this system above the majority of configurations in the database. The CPU's dominance is clear: its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 and Geekbench multi-core score of 26702 indicate elite-level processing power, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and PassMark G3D score of 12534 show solid mid-range graphics capability. This is a desktop-class build where the processor is the star, capable of handling the most demanding compute workloads, while the graphics card provides adequate gaming performance at 1080p and moderate settings at 1440p, with clear headroom for a future GPU upgrade.