SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + Intel Arc A770M: A Mobile Workhorse with a Curious GPU Pairing

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX paired with the Intel Arc A770M represents an all-Intel mobile platform aimed at users who need serious multi-threaded compute power above all else. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors tested, while the GPU lands in the 62nd percentile — a gap that immediately signals this is a build where the processor is the star and the graphics solution is competent but secondary. This laptop-class pairing combines Intel's latest Arrow Lake-HX architecture with the Alchemist-generation Arc 7 mobile GPU, creating a system that excels in productivity and content creation but requires careful expectations for high-end gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant for high-performance mobile systems. It uses a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The base clock runs at 2.80 GHz, boosting up to 5.50 GHz under load, while the thermal design power is rated at 55 W — a modest figure for a 24-core part that speaks to the efficiency of the 3 nm node.

Cache configuration is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout supports the processor's high multi-threaded throughput. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature that makes it relevant for workstation-class workloads where data integrity matters.

Benchmark results demonstrate remarkable multi-core strength. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 36,429.5 multi-core and 2,187.5 single-core. The R20 run shows 20,236 multi-core and 2,856 single-core, while R15 yields 5,656.5 multi-core and 323.5 single-core. These numbers place the processor in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76,155. The nearest rivals are telling: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212 (0.1% higher), AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76,492 (0.4% higher), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513 (0.5% higher). Meanwhile, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75,779, putting the Intel part 0.5% ahead. This clustering shows the Ultra 9 285HX trades blows with top-tier desktop and server processors despite being a mobile chip.

PassMark tests reinforce the multi-threaded theme: the multithread score of 56,902 and floating-point math score of 194,998 indicate strong sustained throughput for parallel workloads. Integer math hits 155,076, and data compression scores 631,885. The single-thread score of 4,618 is respectable but not class-leading, which is consistent with the modest single-core Cinebench results. For real workloads, this CPU will chew through video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulations, and any task that can leverage 24 threads. The 24-thread (not 48-thread) design suggests Intel prioritized higher per-core efficiency over hyper-threading, which keeps power in check.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — there is no CPU upgrade path in the traditional sense. This is a laptop build, so the entire platform is sealed. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC capability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU handles display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A770M, carries a 120 W TDP, and the CPU is rated at 55 W. Combined, the system's power draw is substantial for a laptop, but the fact that the GPU's suggested PSU field is absent suggests this is a self-contained mobile design where the power delivery is integrated into the laptop's charging system. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes but runs at Gen 4 speeds.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck in gaming scenarios, given its 62nd percentile standing versus the CPU's 95th percentile. However, because this is a laptop with BGA sockets and integrated graphics, the only realistic "upgrade" is a new system entirely. Users should view this platform as a complete package: the CPU's 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache will remain relevant for years in productivity tasks, while the GPU will age faster in gaming. The 55 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom that the 120 W GPU will consume, so cooling design is critical.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's performance is exceptional, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 76,155. The nearest rival comparisons show a tightly contested field: the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is 0.1% faster, the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is 0.5% faster — all within rounding error. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 0.5% slower. This means the Ultra 9 285HX is effectively tied with the best desktop processors available, which is remarkable for a mobile part.

The GPU tells a different story. The Intel Arc A770M scores an average benchmark of 18,383, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 460 (0.1% faster), AMD FirePro D500 (0.8% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (1.1% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (1.2% slower). The fact that the Arc A770M trades blows with an RTX 3060 Mobile — a mid-range laptop GPU from a previous generation — puts its performance in perspective. It is not a high-end gaming GPU, but it is capable.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2,278. Geekbench OpenCL scores 89,494, and Vulkan scores 74,422. PassMark G3D scores 11,774, while GPU compute scores 4,778. The DirectX tests show 56 for DX10, 69 for DX11, 70 for DX12, and 178 for DX9 — these low numbers reflect the synthetic nature of PassMark's older DirectX tests rather than real-world gaming performance. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, which reflects the strong CPU dragging up a mid-tier GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile standing and its proximity to the RTX 3060 Mobile suggest 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is realistic, but high-refresh 1440p will strain the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures it will never be the limiting factor in games, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically feed.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The multi-thread score of 56,902 and Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 36,429.5 indicate the processor can handle x264 encoding at high presets without impacting game performance. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder comparison in the data makes it secondary to the CPU for this task.

Video editing: This is where the system shines. The CPU's floating-point math score of 194,998 and data compression score of 631,885 translate to fast timeline rendering, effect processing, and export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will carry most of the load.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 36,429.5 puts this CPU in contention with desktop Threadripper and Ryzen 9 parts. CPU-based rendering in Blender, V-Ray, or similar will be very fast. GPU rendering will be limited by the Arc A770M's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is mid-range.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 155,076 and data encryption score of 48,567 indicate strong performance for code compilation, encryption workloads, and data processing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill. The single-thread score of 4,618 handles everyday tasks effortlessly, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides display output when the discrete GPU is idle. The 55 W CPU TDP means battery life will be reasonable for a high-performance laptop, though the 120 W GPU will drain power when active.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile while the GPU sits in the 62nd percentile — a 33-point gap that defines this system's character. In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the Ultra 9 285HX will perform at near-desktop levels, matching AMD's best Ryzen 9 and Threadripper parts within 0.5%. The GPU will not impede these tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the Arc A770M becomes the limiting factor. Its average benchmark score of 18,383 places it just 1.2% ahead of the RTX 3060 Mobile, which means frame rates will be typical of that class of GPU. The CPU's potential to feed high frame rates is wasted because the GPU cannot keep up. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a productivity monster with gaming as a secondary function.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects this compromise. The system is better than 79% of all laptop configurations tested, but that figure is pulled down by the GPU. For users who prioritize CPU compute, this is a near-ideal pairing. For gamers, the GPU will be the source of frustration, as the CPU's 95th percentile cannot compensate for the GPU's 62nd percentile in frame rate-limited scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and power users who need serious multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The 95th percentile CPU makes it ideal for 3D artists using CPU-based renderers, video editors working with long timelines and complex effects, and software developers compiling large codebases. The ECC memory support and 24 cores also make it suitable for scientific computing and data analysis workloads that run on laptops.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will benefit from the CPU's floating-point math score of 194,998 and data compression score of 631,885, which accelerate codec-heavy workflows. The 16 GB GPU VRAM provides headroom for large textures in 3D scenes, though the GPU's overall compute is mid-range.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU more than adequate for any coursework, but the system is overkill for basic office tasks. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, databases, or complex Excel models will appreciate the 24 threads and 36 MB L3 cache. The GPU is sufficient for basic CAD and light GPU compute, but it is not a workstation-class graphics solution.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they are satisfied with 1080p medium settings and are primarily buying this for non-gaming work. The GPU's 62nd percentile and its proximity to the RTX 3060 Mobile define its gaming ceiling.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278, PassMark G3D score of 11,774, and its 1.2% lead over the RTX 3060 Mobile provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU can be expected to deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding AAA games, based on the RTX 3060 Mobile comparison. Older or less demanding titles like esports games could exceed 60 FPS at 1080p ultra. At 1440p ultra, the GPU will struggle; expect 30-50 FPS in modern titles, with some games requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks at any resolution, so the GPU will be the sole limiter.

The Arc A770M's 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is generous for the GPU's compute level, which helps with high-resolution textures but does not compensate for the raw compute deficit. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern games, and Vulkan 1.4 support is current. These are estimates, not measured results.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the Ultra 9 285HX scores 76,155 while the Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212, making the AMD part 0.1% faster. This is within measurement noise, so the two are effectively tied.

Q: Is the Arc A770M a good laptop GPU for gaming?

A: The GPU sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs and is 1.2% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. This indicates it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings but will struggle at 1440p ultra in demanding titles.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation and scientific computing use cases where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 55 W, which is modest for a 24-core processor and reflects the efficiency of the 3 nm process node.

Q: Can I upgrade the CPU or GPU in this laptop?

A: No. The CPU uses a BGA 2114 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, and the GPU is a mobile part with an IGP slot width. This is a sealed laptop platform with no field-upgradeable components.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU have?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for the 24-core architecture but is not as high as some desktop platforms.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and is part of the Alchemist generation for mobile Arcs. It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. This hardware configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clock speeds are a base of 1650 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The compute capabilities are 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 262.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 524.8 GTexel/s. The 120 W TDP is significant for a mobile GPU but is offset by the CPU's modest 55 W draw.

Benchmark data places this GPU in the 62nd percentile with an average score of 18,383. The nearest rivals are all within 1.2%: the AMD Radeon RX 460 (0.1% faster), AMD FirePro D500 (0.8% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (1.1% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (1.2% slower). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,494 confirm mid-range performance. The 16 GB VRAM is double what many comparable GPUs offer, which is its main advantage for texture-heavy workloads, but raw compute is the limiting factor.

For rendering tasks, the GPU's FP32 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS is adequate for entry-level GPU rendering but will be slower than higher-tier workstation GPUs. The 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but their performance relative to the GPU's overall compute suggests it will be usable only at lower settings. The production status is end-of-life, meaning Intel has moved on from this architecture.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX CPU with the Intel Arc A770M GPU, both from Intel. The system's combined percentile is 79, placing it above 79% of all tested configurations. The CPU is the clear performance leader, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with a 24-core, 24-thread Arrow Lake-HX design on a 3 nm process. The GPU, in contrast, sits in the 62nd percentile, representing Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc 7 mobile part with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The pairing creates a system that is exceptional for CPU-bound workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing — where the processor's performance rivals AMD's best desktop parts like the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (0.5% slower than the Intel CPU). For gaming, the GPU's performance is comparable to an RTX 3060 Mobile, meaning 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is the realistic ceiling. The overall tier is that of a high-end productivity laptop with mid-range gaming capability, defined by the 33-percentile gap between CPU and GPU. Users who need maximum multi-threaded compute in a mobile form factor will find this compelling; gamers should temper expectations.