SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + Intel Arc A550M: Database Analysis

This build pairs Intel's top-tier mobile processor, the Core Ultra 9 285HX, with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combination a strong overall position. The data indicates a system that excels in multi-threaded workloads and offers solid, though not flagship, graphics performance. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 91, placing it in the upper tier of laptop configurations. This reflects the strong showing of both the CPU (95th percentile) and the GPU (86th percentile) in their respective benchmark pools.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285HX compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX has an average benchmark score of 76155, which is nearly identical to the Ryzen 9 8945HX's score of 76212. The delta is -0.1%, indicating the two processors are effectively neck-and-neck in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This configuration supports 1080p and 1440p gaming with high detail settings in most titles.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 9 285HX supports ECC memory. This is a notable feature for users who require data integrity in professional workloads such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 3 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process. The CPU integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, whereas the GPU contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.50 GHz, while the GPU has a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The CPU's high boost clock contributes to its strong single-thread performance, scoring 4618 in Passmark single-thread tests.

Q: Is the GPU considered end-of-life?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M has a production status of "End-of-life." This suggests that while it remains a capable option, it is at the tail end of its product cycle and may not receive long-term driver optimizations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is exceptional, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5. This places it far ahead of typical mobile processors and competes with high-end desktop parts. The single-core score of 2187.5 in Cinebench R23 is equally impressive, indicating strong per-thread performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. In Passmark tests, the CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 56902 and a single-thread score of 4618, reinforcing its dual nature as both a high-core-count workhorse and a responsive single-core performer.

The GPU delivers solid mid-range results. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 49894, and its Vulkan score is 49580. These scores place the Arc A550M at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, scores 49957, which is only 0.4% higher, suggesting the A550M is competitive with newer, higher-end options in compute workloads. However, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2.4% ahead, indicating the A550M sits slightly below the top-tier of discrete graphics.

Taken together, the data paints a picture of a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU performance. The 95th percentile CPU ranking means the processor is a top-5% part, while the 86th percentile GPU ranking means the graphics card is good but not elite. This imbalance suggests the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in workloads, while the GPU may struggle to keep pace in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A550M's compute scores suggest it can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are uncertain. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate it can push high frame rates in less demanding titles, but may fall short of 144Hz in AAA games at maximum settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The multi-thread score of 56902 in Passmark means the CPU can handle the overhead of x264 encoding while maintaining smooth gameplay, and the Arc A550M's dedicated media engine can offload this task entirely, freeing the CPU for other duties.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 excels in rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units accelerate effects and color grading, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit work with very large 4K or 8K projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. A Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20236 indicates excellent performance in CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles. The GPU can assist via OpenCL rendering, with its 49894 Geekbench OpenCL score providing a moderate boost, but it will not replace a dedicated workstation GPU.

Software Development: The CPU's 24 threads handle compilation and testing with ease. The Passmark data encryption score of 48567 suggests strong performance in cryptographic operations, and the data compression score of 631885 indicates fast build artifact handling. The high single-thread score also ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for these tasks, but the high single-thread score of 4618 ensures everything from spreadsheet calculations to web browsing feels instant. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency, and the low 55 W TDP means the laptop can run cool and quiet during light workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets power users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the Arc A550M sufficient for medium-to-high settings in most titles, though they should not expect maxed-out ultra settings at high refresh rates. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit most from the CPU's raw multi-threaded power, which excels in rendering and export tasks. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and high memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. Students in engineering or data science programs will have more than enough power for simulations and data analysis. Small business workstations that need to handle complex financial models or database operations will also find this build capable, especially given the ECC memory support.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 285HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This design prioritizes multi-core throughput, as seen in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5, which is only 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX.

The single-thread performance is equally notable. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2856 and Passmark single-thread score of 4618 indicate that the processor does not sacrifice responsiveness for core count. The Passmark integer math score of 155076 and floating-point score of 194998 show balanced execution across different instruction types. The find prime numbers score of 460 is relatively low, suggesting some workloads with heavy branching may not benefit fully from the architecture.

The CPU's performance places it in the 95th percentile, meaning it outperforms 95% of all tested CPUs. Compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, it is 0.5% ahead, and it is 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. This puts it in the top tier of mobile processors, rivaling desktop parts in multi-threaded tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a basic display output and can handle light graphics work, but the discrete GPU is the primary graphics solution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile platform with no socketed upgrade path. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU, which connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for professional use.

The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, meaning the combined thermal envelope is modest for a high-performance laptop. This leaves thermal headroom for the rest of the system, though the specific PSU requirement is not listed in the data. The GPU's EOL status means that a future upgrade would likely involve replacing the entire laptop, as mobile GPUs are typically not user-replaceable.

A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support can benefit from higher-bandwidth modules. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 are also possible, given the available lanes. However, the CPU and GPU are both soldered, so users should view this as a complete, fixed configuration rather than a modular one.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy: the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 86th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, this means the Arc A550M will struggle to push high frame rates at 1440p or above, even though the CPU could easily handle the associated physics and AI calculations. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p, but higher resolutions will cause bottlenecks.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the system will excel because the GPU is not a factor. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 56902 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 ensure that these workloads complete quickly. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 can provide some acceleration in rendering, but it is not powerful enough to be the primary compute engine.

The imbalance is also reflected in the combined percentile of 91, which is lower than the CPU's 95th percentile but higher than the GPU's 86th percentile. This suggests the overall system performance is dragged down slightly by the GPU. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks will not notice this imbalance, but gamers and GPU-accelerated workflows will.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs a flagship mobile CPU with a mid-range discrete GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a 24-thread processor from the Arrow Lake-HX family, while the Intel Arc A550M is a 2048-shader GPU from the Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 91 places this system in the top 9% of all tested configurations, making it a high-tier laptop for professional and enthusiast use.

The CPU is the defining component, with a 95th percentile ranking that puts it among the fastest mobile processors available. The GPU, at the 86th percentile, is solidly above average but not at the top of the range. The data shows a system that is best suited for users who need massive multi-threaded CPU power, such as video editors, 3D artists, and developers, rather than those seeking the ultimate gaming laptop. The build is characterized by its high core count, fast clock speeds, and modern process node, all of which contribute to its strong benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. Therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580, the Arc A550M is expected to deliver smooth 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. In esports games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system should achieve high frame rates well above 100 FPS, thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 4618 in Passmark. In AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU may struggle to maintain 60 FPS consistently, likely falling to 40-50 FPS in demanding scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. Frame rates are expected to drop further, with many games requiring reduced settings to hit 60 FPS. The CPU's performance will not be the bottleneck at this resolution; the GPU will be the primary constraint. For 4K gaming, this system is not recommended, as the GPU lacks the raw compute power and memory bandwidth to deliver playable frame rates. The data suggests this is a 1080p gaming laptop with occasional 1440p capability at lower settings.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, placing it at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, is only 0.4% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2.4% ahead. This indicates the A550M performs comparably to high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, despite being a mobile part. The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests ray tracing performance will be modest compared to modern NVIDIA parts.

The GPU's 60 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop, and its "IGP" slot width indicates it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module. The 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are mid-range figures, supporting the conclusion that this GPU targets 1080p gaming and light-to-moderate creative workloads. The production status is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support, but the current API support is comprehensive.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds