SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing that targets high-end productivity with solid 1440p gaming capability. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake-S part with a 95th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This combination yields an 88th percentile overall placement, indicating a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU-intensive tasks but retains enough graphical power for demanding visual workloads. The following analysis breaks down the performance dynamics, component-level strengths, and ideal use cases for this configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear asymmetry between the two components. The Core Ultra 9 285 achieves a 95th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75488. In contrast, the RTX 4070 holds an 81st percentile rank with an average score of 37648. This 14-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, capable of feeding data to the GPU faster than the GPU can process it in most scenarios.

Benchmark results confirm this imbalance. In PassMark multithreaded tests, the CPU scores 56602, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 26927. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 194988 and integer math score of 164869 further illustrate its computational headroom. For gaming, this means the RTX 4070 will almost certainly be the limiting factor at lower resolutions, where the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them. At higher resolutions, the bottleneck shifts toward the GPU, as the rendering load increases and the CPU’s 5.60 GHz boost clock becomes less critical.

The CPU’s 24 threads and 36 MB of shared L3 cache provide ample parallelism for background tasks, but the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy workloads. The data suggests that applications relying heavily on single-threaded performance, evidenced by the 6909 Cinebench R23 single-core score, will run efficiently, while multi-threaded tasks will benefit from the CPU’s 48945 R23 multi-core result. The bottleneck is situational: CPU-bound in lightly threaded or physics-heavy scenarios, GPU-bound in high-resolution rendering, and balanced in mixed productivity workloads.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X across a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, though the 192-bit bus width limits extreme resolution scaling. The GPU’s 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors provide a balanced compute configuration.

Clock speeds are set at 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, making it well-equipped for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. Compute performance is rated at 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is modest compared to higher-tier cards but adequate for most creative applications.

Benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 places it firmly in the mid-range segment, while Geekbench OpenCL (154858) and Vulkan (174152) scores show strong compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and GPU compute score of 14720 indicate solid rasterization performance. The pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s support high refresh rates at 1440p. The 81st percentile ranking places it near the RTX 4080 Mobile, which scores 38135, and the RX Vega 56, which scores 37507, showing it outperforms the latter by 0.4% but trails the former by 1.3%.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores are 48945 for multi-core and 6909 for single-core, representing strong results for a 65 W TDP part. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 and single-thread score of 4881 further corroborate this. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 are consistent with its 81st percentile placement.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the CPU’s average score of 75488 is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582, -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75716, -0.3% delta), while slightly ahead of the AMD EPYC 4545P (75373, 0.2% delta). This places the Core Ultra 9 285 in a tightly contested performance band where differences are within measurement error. The GPU’s average score of 37648 sits between the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, 0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157, 1.3% delta), and is 1.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135).

The combined percentile of 88 underscores that this system excels in CPU-bound tasks. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU’s 81st percentile is good but not class-leading. For users prioritizing processor performance, this pairing delivers near-flagship CPU capabilities with mid-range GPU performance. The data indicates the CPU is the star, with the GPU providing competent but not extraordinary graphics power.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who require substantial multi-core processing for productivity but do not need top-tier gaming performance. The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 48945 multi-core Cinebench R23 score, make it ideal for content creators, software developers, and engineers running parallel workloads. The 95th percentile CPU rank means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, making it suitable for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations.

The RTX 4070’s 81st percentile GPU rank and 12 GB VRAM make it appropriate for gamers at 1440p resolution seeking high to ultra settings. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 29.15 TFLOPS compute power support modern game engines and ray tracing effects. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s efficiency, with a 65 W TDP reducing cooling requirements, while the GPU’s dual-slot design and 240 mm length fit most mid-tower cases.

Professional users in architecture or product design will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 194988 for CAD and simulation work, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 174152 aids in real-time visualization. The system is less suited for 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute, where the 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus may become limiting factors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive high refresh rates in competitive titles. The CPU’s 6909 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures minimal frame time spikes. At 4K, the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will struggle with ultra textures, but 1080p high-refresh gaming is well within reach.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding workloads efficiently, with a PassMark data compression score of 602121. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities, implied by the 184 tensor cores, can offload encoding tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The 48945 multi-core Cinebench R23 score accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM supports 4K preview and effects processing. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed footage.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 cores provide strong CPU-based rendering performance, as shown by the 56602 PassMark multithread score. The GPU’s 46 ray tracing cores accelerate RTX-enabled renderers, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 164869 and data encryption score of 46949 speed up compilation and cryptographic operations. The 24 threads allow parallel builds, while the 36 MB L3 cache improves code locality.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make it reliable for long-running computations. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1164 handles 2D desktop workloads efficiently. The system is overkill for basic tasks but provides headroom for advanced projects.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile relative to all other processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 ranks in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75488.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 scores 37648 on average, which is 1.3% lower than the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 38135.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 48945 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 6909.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features.

Q: What is the CPU’s power consumption and socket type?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is compatible with the LGA 1851 platform.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves an 88th percentile combined ranking, indicating a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP making it power-efficient for a high-core-count part. The CPU includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The architecture supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, along with ECC memory for error correction in critical workloads. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for storage and GPUs. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display capabilities, though a discrete GPU is required for demanding tasks.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and PassMark multithread score of 56602. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a 6909 R23 single-core score and 4881 PassMark single-thread score. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 75488 places it in the 95th percentile, just 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die provide high density and efficiency, making this a capable processor for both productivity and gaming workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform designed for Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which is beneficial for workstation and server environments. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes allows for high-bandwidth storage and graphics cards, though the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The GPU has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, leaving headroom for additional components. The 1x 16-pin power connector is compatible with modern power supplies, and the dual-slot design fits standard cases. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so future upgrades would involve moving to newer NVIDIA or AMD offerings.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the CPU retains significant headroom. The 95th percentile CPU rank means it will not bottleneck most graphics cards, so upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would improve gaming and rendering performance. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster NVMe storage via PCIe Gen 5 would enhance system responsiveness. The 65 W CPU TDP allows for air or liquid cooling upgrades to support sustained all-core workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake-S processor in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card in the 81st percentile. The combined percentile of 88 indicates a high-performance system with a strong emphasis on CPU capabilities.

The pairing is well-suited for users who prioritize processing power over raw graphics performance. The CPU’s 48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 56602 PassMark multithread score make it a top-tier productivity processor, while the GPU’s 26927 PassMark G3D score provides solid 1440p gaming performance. The system occupies a niche where CPU-bound workloads benefit from near-flagship performance, but GPU-bound tasks are limited to mid-range expectations.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP combine for a total system draw that a 550 W PSU can handle, keeping thermal and power requirements manageable. This build is appropriate for a workstation or high-end desktop used for content creation, development, and gaming at 1440p.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures discussed below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Given the CPU’s 95th percentile rank and the GPU’s 81st percentile rank, gaming performance at 1440p is expected to be strong. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle most titles at high to ultra settings in 1440p, with frame rates in the 60-100+ range depending on the game. The CPU’s 6909 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures low frame time variance, reducing stutter in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p, the CPU’s power becomes more apparent, and the GPU is likely the limiting factor. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings, and frame rates could exceed 144 FPS in esports titles. At 4K, the GPU’s 192-bit bus and 12 GB VRAM will struggle with ultra textures, and frame rates may drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 suggests the GPU is not designed for 4K gaming, but it can handle 1440p with ray tracing enabled via the 46 RT cores and DLSS upscaling.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds