SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: A Desktop Powerhouse with a Mid-Range Heart

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake flagship CPU with NVIDIA's entry-level Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a system that sits at the 78th percentile overall among all builds. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 95th percentile against all processors, while the GPU lands in the 61st percentile against all graphics cards. This stark contrast defines the system's character: exceptional compute throughput for productivity and content creation, paired with capable but not class-leading graphics performance. The data shows a machine built for serious work that can also handle modern gaming, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4060's benchmark scores indicate it can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in competitive titles, though the absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide a solid foundation for esports and older AAA games at high settings. The CPU's single-core strength, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909, ensures that frame pacing and minimum FPS will not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, though the GPU will cap maximum frame rates in graphically intensive titles.

Streaming: The combination of Intel's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU and NVIDIA's dedicated encoder hardware makes this a viable streaming platform. The CPU's 24 threads can handle game encoding and streaming overhead simultaneously, with a Passmark multithread score of 56602 indicating substantial headroom for background tasks. The RTX 4060's tensor cores and RT cores add hardware-accelerated encoding and AI features, though the 8GB VRAM may require careful settings management when gaming and streaming simultaneously.

Video Editing: This is where the system shines. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 places it in the top 5% of all processors, making 4K timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks exceptionally fast. The GPU's 8GB GDDR6 memory and 96 tensor cores accelerate effects like denoising and upscaling in compatible software. The combination of Passmark data compression score of 602121 and floating-point math score of 194988 indicates strong performance for codec conversions and color grading operations.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here, with Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20556 and R15 multicore score of 4933 reflecting outstanding multi-threaded rendering performance. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported renderers, though the 8GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. For CPU-based rendering engines, this system will outperform most workstation-class machines, while GPU rendering will be constrained by the mid-range graphics card.

Software Development: The 24 cores and 24 threads handle parallel compilation tasks with ease, and the Passmark integer math score of 164869 indicates strong performance for code compilation and test execution. The CPU's 36MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth reduce bottlenecks in large codebases. The system's ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds and servers, making it suitable for development workstations that require stability.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overqualified for typical productivity tasks, but the data shows it handles them with effortless speed. The Passmark single-thread score of 4881 ensures snappy application launches and responsive document editing. The CPU's 65W TDP means efficient operation during light workloads, and the integrated graphics provide a backup display output should the dedicated GPU encounter issues. For students in engineering or data science programs, the compute power handles MATLAB, Python, and CAD workloads without breaking a sweat.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 78th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75488, placing it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75716) and 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 4545P (75373). It trails the AMD EPYC 8224P by just 0.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666, a 0.2% difference.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What memory and storage capabilities does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for error correction in critical workloads.

Q: What is the power consumption profile of this build?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP while the GPU has a 115W TDP. The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 300W, indicating the full system can run on a modest power supply.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked through traditional multiplier adjustment. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48945 in multicore and 6909 in single-core, representing a 7.1x ratio between multi and single-threaded performance. This indicates excellent scaling across its 24 cores. The Cinebench R20 scores of 20556 (multi) and 2901 (single) follow a similar pattern. The Passmark suite reinforces this picture: multithread score of 56602, single-thread score of 4881, and strong subsystem scores including floating-point math at 194988 and integer math at 164869.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a different character. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Passmark G3D score of 19545 place it in the mid-range tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 indicates solid compute performance, while the Vulkan score of 48643 suggests good API efficiency. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 175 versus DirectX 12 score of 76 shows expected scaling with newer APIs, though the DirectX 10 score of 103 and DirectX 9 score of 236 indicate legacy title compatibility.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms 95% of all processors while the GPU outperforms 61% of all graphics cards. This 34-percentage-point gap is substantial and defines the system's dual personality. For compute-heavy workloads, this is a top-tier machine; for gaming, it is a solid mid-range performer. The average CPU benchmark score of 75488 is 4.3x higher than the GPU's average of 17639, quantifying the performance disparity between components.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: The RTX 4060's 8GB VRAM and 272 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched to 1080p gaming, where the CPU's single-core strength prevents bottlenecking in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means most modern games will run at high settings with estimated 60+ FPS in less demanding titles, though these are estimates without measured data.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit most from this pairing. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking handles rendering and encoding tasks that would bottleneck lesser processors, while the GPU's tensor cores accelerate AI-assisted editing tools. The 8GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video work but may limit 4K compositing.

Software Developers: The 24-core CPU with ECC memory support makes this an excellent workstation for game development, data science, and backend engineering. The Passmark data encryption score of 46949 and extended instructions score of 45357 indicate strong performance for cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads.

Students and Researchers: Engineering and computer science students running simulations, compiling large projects, or training small machine learning models will find the CPU's compute power invaluable. The GPU's 96 tensor cores provide entry-level AI acceleration, though serious ML work would require a more powerful GPU.

Small Business Workstations: The combination of ECC memory support, 65W CPU TDP, and 115W GPU TDP creates a system that is efficient enough for 24/7 operation. The CPU's reliability features and the GPU's production status (end-of-life) suggest a stable platform for office workstations, though the GPU is no longer in active production.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3nm process node, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This makes it one of the most advanced desktop processors available, with a density that enables high performance within a 65W TDP. The 24 cores and 24 threads operate with no hyperthreading, a design choice that prioritizes power efficiency and thermal management over raw thread count.

The clock speeds range from 2.50 GHz base to 5.60 GHz boost, providing a 2.24x frequency headroom for burst workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 192KB L1 per core, 3MB L2 per core, and 36MB shared L3, totaling a substantial cache footprint that reduces memory latency. The dual-channel DDR5 memory interface delivers 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient to feed the 24 cores without significant bottlenecks in most workloads.

The benchmark scores translate to real-world performance as follows: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 puts this CPU in the top 5% of all processors, rivaling workstation-class chips like the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582 average score, 0.1% difference). The single-core score of 6909 is equally impressive, ensuring responsive performance in lightly threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 56602 and single-thread score of 4881 reinforce this dual strength. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking across all CPUs is justified by these results, making it a top-tier choice for any compute-intensive workload.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip built on TSMC's 5nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. This compact design achieves a transistor density of 118.9 million per mm², enabling 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units within a 115W TDP. The 8GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features. The FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicates balanced compute capabilities. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s suggest solid rasterization throughput for its class. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the 8GB frame buffer, and the dual-slot cooling design with a 1x 12-pin power connector keeps installation simple.

The benchmark scores place this GPU in the 61st percentile, with an average score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are older cards: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% faster) and Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% slower). This indicates the RTX 4060 performs at a level comparable to mid-range cards from several generations ago, though it brings modern features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support. The Passmark G3D score of 19545 and compute score of 9213 show it handles both graphics and compute tasks competently, but the 8GB VRAM is a limitation for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Gaming Performance

Important note: No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. The following estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

At 1080p resolution, the RTX 4060's 61st percentile ranking suggests it can handle most modern titles at high settings with playable frame rates. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 power and 272 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p rendering, while the CPU's single-core strength ensures consistent frame delivery. Competitive shooters and esports titles should easily exceed 100 FPS at competitive settings, given the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 175 and the CPU's 6909 single-core Cinebench score.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 8GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus limit texture detail and anti-aliasing options in demanding titles. Estimated frame rates would drop to 40-60 FPS in AAA games at high settings, with lower settings required for smoother gameplay. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicates it is not designed for high-refresh 1440p gaming in modern titles.

The CPU's gaming performance is excellent, but it will rarely be the bottleneck. The 24 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks like Discord, browser tabs, and streaming software, while the 5.6 GHz boost clock ensures minimal latency in CPU-bound scenarios. The combination of high single-core and multicore scores means the system can maintain stable frame times even in poorly optimized games that rely on a few threads.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs Intel's flagship Core Ultra 9 285 processor with NVIDIA's entry-level RTX 4060 graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, featuring a 3nm process node and 65W TDP. The GPU is an end-of-life Ada Lovelace card with 8GB GDDR6 memory and a 115W TDP. The combined system sits at the 78th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms most desktop configurations.

The class is clearly desktop, with the CPU's market segment confirmed as Desktop and the GPU designed for full-sized expansion slots. The system's tier is defined by the 34-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 61st percentile. This places it in a unique position: it is a top-tier productivity machine with mid-range gaming capability. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 is competitive with workstation processors like the AMD EPYC 8224P, while the GPU's performance matches older mid-range cards like the Radeon HD 7790.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $579, and for the GPU it is $299 USD. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, meaning availability may decline over time. The system requires a motherboard with Intel Socket 1851 and a power supply rated at least 300W for the GPU, though the 65W CPU TDP keeps overall power requirements modest. This is a balanced workstation with gaming capability, rather than a gaming-first build with productivity as a secondary concern.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile creates a clear bottleneck hierarchy: the GPU will limit gaming performance, while the CPU will limit nothing in most workloads.

In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck across all resolutions. The RTX 4060's 8GB VRAM and 272 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and its 61st percentile ranking means it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles at 1440p or higher. The CPU's 6909 single-core Cinebench score and 4881 Passmark single-thread score ensure it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can render frames in most scenarios, making the GPU the limiting factor for FPS.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 48945 multicore Cinebench score dominates, and the GPU's compute capabilities become secondary. For video editing, the CPU handles most processing, with the GPU accelerating specific effects. For 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, the CPU is the sole bottleneck. For GPU-based rendering, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS and 8GB VRAM become limiting factors, though the CPU's speed ensures data is always ready for the GPU.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant gaming performance gains. A more powerful GPU with higher percentile ranking would remove the current bottleneck and allow the CPU's full gaming potential to manifest. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would provide negligible gaming benefits, as the current CPU is already far ahead of the GPU's needs. For productivity, the balance is more even, with the CPU being the primary driver and the GPU providing acceleration where applicable. This system is best understood as a high-end CPU that happens to include a mid-range GPU, making it ideal for users who prioritize compute performance over gaming frame rates.