SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 95th percentile for both components, placing it firmly in the enthusiast tier of computing hardware. The CPU, built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, despite being from the previous generation, offers massive memory bandwidth and raw compute power that remains competitive. The data shows a system designed for heavy parallel workloads and high-resolution gaming, though the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.60 GHz, with a 65W TDP that is notably modest for a 24-core desktop part. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments. The L3 cache totals 36 MB shared, with 192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2 per core, and the processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark results show a strong all-round performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 48,945 multi-core and 6,909 single-core, indicating exceptional scaling across all 24 cores without compromising single-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 results of 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core follow the same pattern. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score of 56,602, integer math at 164,869, floating-point math at 194,988, and data compression at 602,121. The extended instructions score of 45,357 suggests robust AVX-512 or similar vector processing capabilities, which benefits scientific computing and cryptographic workloads.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all processors places it in elite company, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 8224P (avgScore 75,582, deltaPct -0.1), AMD EPYC 4545P (avgScore 75,373, deltaPct 0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (avgScore 75,716, deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (avgScore 75,738, deltaPct -0.3). The average benchmark score of 75,488 puts it within 0.3% of these competitors, showing that the Core Ultra 9 285 trades blows with high-end server and workstation chips. However, its desktop socket (Intel Socket 1851) and 65W TDP suggest it achieves this performance at significantly lower power draw than those enterprise parts.

For real workloads, the 24-core configuration without hyperthreading means 24 physical threads, which is optimal for tasks that benefit from physical cores like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. The single-core score of 4,881 in PassMark indicates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The data compression score of 602,121 and encryption score of 46,949 point to strong performance in file archiving and data security applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning no hyperthreading is present. This provides 24 physical execution threads for parallel workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 8224P, 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 4545P, and 0.3% lower than both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755.

Q: What memory and expansion support does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. This is paired with 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs.

Q: What are the GPU's ray tracing and tensor capabilities?

A: The GPU includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It delivers 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The GPU is classified as end-of-life, released in January 2022, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. The CPU remains actively produced.

Q: How does the GPU rank against other graphics cards?

A: The GPU sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 131,938. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA L4 (deltaPct 0.7), NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (deltaPct -2.4), NVIDIA A10M (deltaPct -2.4), and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (deltaPct -2.6).

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a system where the CPU and GPU are well-matched for most workloads, but the balance shifts depending on the task. The CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile indicate both components perform at the same overall tier, meaning neither is a clear bottleneck in general-purpose scenarios. However, the specific strengths of each component create distinct scenarios.

For multi-threaded CPU workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602 demonstrate it can sustain heavy parallel processing. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 40.00 TFLOPS and texture rate of 625.0 GTexel/s suggest it can also accelerate rendering workloads, but the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor here. The data indicates the GPU's 24 GB memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient to feed the CPU's data requirements.

In gaming scenarios, the balance shifts toward the GPU being the primary performance driver. The CPU's single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 is strong but not exceptional, meaning at lower resolutions the CPU could become a bottleneck in frame rate. The GPU's raw compute power, represented by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633, suggests it can handle high-resolution gaming without issue. The CPU's 65W TDP and lower clock speeds compared to more aggressive desktop parts might limit maximum frame rates in CPU-bound titles at 1080p.

Neither component shows a significant weakness in the data. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 is respectable, and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 174,441 is competitive. The system is balanced at the 95th percentile for both, meaning users are unlikely to experience a severe bottleneck in either direction. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination prevents definitive bottleneck analysis, but the percentile parity suggests a harmonious pairing.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who demand maximum parallel compute performance without sacrificing single-thread responsiveness. The 24-core CPU with 36 MB L3 cache and the 24 GB GPU with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are ideally suited for content creators working with large datasets, 3D artists rendering complex scenes, and video editors processing high-resolution footage. The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate this build can handle hours-long renders and exports with minimal wait times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 24 physical threads and PassMark integer math score of 164,869, which translates to faster build times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation jobs, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface provides future-proofing for high-speed storage. Students in engineering or data science programs will find the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and GPU's 95th percentile ranking more than adequate for simulations and machine learning coursework.

Small business workstations running virtual machines or database workloads will appreciate the data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121. The 65W TDP of the CPU allows for more compact cooling solutions in office environments, while the GPU's triple-slot design and 850W suggested PSU require a spacious case and robust power delivery. This is not a system for casual users; it is built for professionals who need to process large amounts of data quickly and reliably.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and 208.3 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest excellent performance at 1440p and 4K, but the CPU's single-core performance may limit frame rates at 1080p in esports titles. Estimated frame rates are high but not measured for this exact combination.

Streaming: The combination of 24 CPU threads and the GPU's 336 tensor cores for AI-accelerated encoding makes this a capable streaming platform. The CPU's multi-thread score of 56,602 in PassMark ensures no stutter while encoding video, though streaming software will compete for resources with the game.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and the GPU's 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The 24 GB GPU memory can hold large video buffers, and the 625.0 GTexel/s texture rate accelerates effects processing.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's 84 RT cores with DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 output and 336 tensor cores for denoising make this a strong choice for Blender or Maya workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 164,869 integer math score and 45,357 extended instructions score speed up compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency, and ECC support improves stability for long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 4,881 in PassMark ensures snappy application launch and multitasking, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics can handle office workloads if the discrete GPU is not needed. The CPU's 65W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on workstations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is based on the GA102 chip with Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 1560 MHz and boosts to 1860 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU houses 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. This configuration delivers 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance, with pixel rate of 208.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 625.0 GTexel/s.

The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and large datasets in rendering or machine learning. The memory configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and professional applications. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires a 450W TDP with a suggested 850W PSU, drawing power through a single 16-pin connector.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 131,938. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633 and OpenCL score of 174,441 show robust compute capabilities. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA L4 (deltaPct 0.7), which is 0.7% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation (deltaPct -2.4), NVIDIA A10M (deltaPct -2.4), and AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (deltaPct -2.6), all of which are 2.4-2.6% faster in average score.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game. Therefore, all frame rate figures presented here are estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so treat these as qualitative expectations grounded in the GPU's compute capabilities and the CPU's single-thread performance.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 24 GB memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth should allow ultra settings in most titles without running out of VRAM, and the 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 output is sufficient for demanding AAA games. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests frame rates in the high range for 4K, though exact numbers cannot be stated. At 1440p, the CPU's single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 may become a factor in CPU-bound games, potentially limiting the GPU's full potential. At 1080p, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 is below the highest-end gaming CPUs, so esports titles running at very high frame rates may see CPU limitations.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,741 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215,633 indicate strong API-level performance, but without measured FPS data, any specific frame rate claim would be speculative. The system is positioned for high-refresh 1440p or smooth 4K gaming, with the GPU's RT cores enabling ray-traced effects without severe performance penalties.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 desktop CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti desktop GPU, creating a high-end desktop system that ranks at the 95th percentile for both components and the combined configuration. The CPU is an actively produced part from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is end-of-life from the GeForce 30-series, meaning this build uses a current-generation CPU with a previous-generation flagship GPU. The combined percentile of 95 places this system in the top 5% of all desktop configurations.

The CPU launches at an MSRP of $579, while the GPU launched at $1,999 USD, though these are launch prices and current market prices may vary. The build class is desktop, indicating a full-size tower or workstation chassis. The CPU's 65W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, allowing for efficient cooling, while the GPU's 450W TDP and triple-slot design require substantial airflow and a strong PSU. This is a system for users who prioritize parallel compute performance and high-resolution gaming, with the CPU's ECC support and the GPU's large memory making it suitable for professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488, placing it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core of 48,945 and single-core of 6,909, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 20,556 and single-core of 2,901, and PassMark multi-thread of 56,602 with single-thread of 4,881. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75,582 (deltaPct -0.1), meaning the Core Ultra 9 285 is 0.1% slower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738 (deltaPct -0.3), making the Intel part 0.3% slower.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 131,938, also at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,741, Geekbench Vulkan is 215,633, and Geekbench OpenCL is 174,441. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA L4, scores 131,072 (deltaPct 0.7), making the RTX 3090 Ti 0.7% faster, while the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 (deltaPct -2.4), making the RTX 3090 Ti 2.4% slower. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (deltaPct -2.6), placing it 2.6% ahead.

The combined picture shows a system where both components are within 3% of their nearest competitors, indicating a tightly balanced configuration. The CPU's slight deficit to its rivals (0.1-0.3%) and the GPU's mixed comparison (0.7% faster than L4, 2.4-2.6% slower than others) suggest this build is competitive but not class-leading in either component. The 95th percentile ranking for both means this system outperforms the vast majority of configurations, making it a strong choice for demanding professional and gaming workloads.