SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3070 TiM, creating a desktop build that sits at the 73rd percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread part with a 95th percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the GPU holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs, indicating a substantial performance asymmetry that shapes every workload discussion below.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile GPU standing suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, though the CPU's 95th percentile rank means it will rarely be the limiting factor in frame generation. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for current titles at these resolutions, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile position relative to all GPUs indicates that extreme refresh rates (240 Hz and beyond) will be constrained by the graphics card in most modern games.

Streaming: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285's 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 and the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 48945 indicate that background encoding tasks will have minimal impact on foreground performance. The GPU's 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based enhancement features found in the GeForce 30-series architecture.

Video editing: The combination of a 95th percentile CPU and a 50th percentile GPU creates a system where timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will be CPU-bound in most scenarios. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20556 and R15 multicore score of 4933 demonstrate strong multi-threaded throughput for render-heavy workflows. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides hardware acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions with multiple high-resolution layers.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be this system's strength, with the Core Ultra 9 285's PassMark floating-point math score of 194988 and integer math score of 164869 indicating strong compute throughput for ray tracing and physics simulations. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.60 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) performance support GPU-accelerated renderers, but the 50th percentile ranking means it will not compete with higher-tier graphics cards for viewport performance in dense scenes.

Software development: The 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, make this an excellent platform for parallel compilation, containerized development environments, and large-scale code analysis. The PassMark data compression score of 602121 and extended instructions score of 45357 indicate strong performance for compression-heavy workflows like source control operations and build artifact packaging. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially over-provisioned for typical productivity tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4881 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 ensure snappy responsiveness in document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU mean the system draws moderate power, though the triple-slot GPU requires adequate case clearance for compact desk setups.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 demonstrates exceptional CPU performance with a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 75488. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75582, placing the Intel part just 0.1% behind, while the AMD EPYC 4545P trails at 75373, a 0.2% margin in favor of the Intel chip. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 each score 75716 and 75738 respectively, positioning them 0.3% ahead of the Core Ultra 9 285.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945, a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20556, and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4933. Single-thread performance is equally notable with Cinebench R23 single-core at 6909, R20 single-core at 2901, and R15 single-core at 696. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 56602, single-thread of 4881, physics at 3598, and a floating-point math score of 194988.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs with a benchmark score of zero in the pack, indicating no CPU-style aggregate benchmark exists for this GPU. The combined system percentile is 73, reflecting that the CPU's strong performance dominates the overall ranking while the GPU anchors the lower end. The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU outperforms 95% of all CPUs, while the GPU outperforms only half of all GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 73rd percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile rank and the GPU's 50th percentile rank.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 75488 places it 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4545P (75373). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 by 0.3%, both scoring 75716 and 75738 respectively.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 features 24 cores and 24 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. It is built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What memory and storage interfaces does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the TDP of each component and the suggested power supply?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, the GPU has a 220 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop configuration?

A: The build class is desktop, with the CPU being an Intel Socket 1851 part and the GPU being a triple-slot, 270 mm long card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant bottleneck asymmetry in this pairing. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means that in CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the GPU will sit idle while the CPU delivers top-tier performance. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3598 and floating-point math score of 194988 indicate strong compute capability that can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in most real-time workloads. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are mid-range figures, suggesting that at 1080p, the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the sole constraint.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance: the system is better than 73% of all builds, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU. The data shows that adding a higher-tier GPU would disproportionately improve gaming performance, whereas upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains for most workloads. The 24-core CPU with 24 threads and 36 MB of shared L3 cache can handle any current game's draw calls and physics without breaking a sweat, but the 8 GB VRAM of the GPU may cause texture streaming bottlenecks in memory-constrained titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning these figures should be treated as analytical projections rather than empirical results.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute, the RTX 3070 TiM is estimated to deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p in most titles at high settings. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current game textures at these resolutions, though ultra-high texture packs in modern AAA titles may exceed this capacity. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates will be driven by the GPU, not the processor, in typical gaming scenarios.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's mid-pack percentile suggests that players will need to reduce settings to achieve playable frame rates, with the 256-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity becoming potential limiting factors. The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 24 threads provide enough headroom for background tasks like Discord or streaming software without impacting gaming performance. Ray tracing workloads will rely on the GPU's 46 RT cores, which are present but represent an older Ampere-generation implementation compared to newer architectures.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p who play at high settings will find this system capable, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame delivery even in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulators. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU's 95th percentile performance, though GPU-accelerated tasks will be capped by the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile standing.

Students and office workers in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find the 24-core CPU ideal for compilation, simulation, and data analysis tasks. The ECC memory support and 65 W CPU TDP make this a viable platform for small business workstations that run virtual machines or databases. However, users seeking high-refresh 4K gaming or professional GPU rendering should look at alternative configurations, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this pairing. The desktop form factor and triple-slot GPU require a full-tower case with adequate airflow, making this less suitable for compact or small-form-factor builds.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably low for a 24-core part. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU's benchmark results show a strong all-round performer: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 places it in the top 5% of all CPUs, while the single-core score of 6909 confirms excellent single-threaded performance for legacy applications. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 and data encryption score of 46949 indicate robust security and threading capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 459 is notably lower, suggesting that pure integer throughput in specific workloads may not scale perfectly linearly with core count, but the integer math score of 164869 shows general-purpose integer performance is strong.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is modest for a 24-core part, which may limit performance in memory-bandwidth-bound workloads like large matrix operations or database scans. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU provides fast connectivity for NVMe storage and expansion cards, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output and media acceleration, which can offload video encode/decode tasks from the main GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The platform's production status is active, meaning the CPU is currently available, while the GPU is end-of-life, suggesting that GPU upgrades will be necessary sooner than CPU upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU, as the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile ranking is the primary bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The 220 W TDP of the current GPU and the 550 W suggested PSU indicate that a higher-tier GPU with a higher power draw would require a PSU upgrade as well. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal and power headroom on the platform, so upgrading the GPU to a higher-percentile card would improve the combined system percentile significantly without changing the CPU.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is backward-compatible with PCIe 5.0 slots, so the CPU's Gen 5 support will not limit current or near-future GPU models. The DDR5 memory support with ECC is a differentiating feature for workstation use, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most workloads, though a future platform with quad-channel memory would benefit memory-intensive applications. The triple-slot GPU with a 270 mm length requires case compatibility, and the 1x 8-pin power connector limits the maximum GPU power draw to the 220 W TDP.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs Intel's flagship Arrow Lake CPU, the Core Ultra 9 285, with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3070 TiM, creating a system that ranks at the 73rd percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU holds a 95th percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, producing a lopsided performance profile that favors compute-heavy workloads over graphics-intensive tasks.

The build's overall tier is best described as a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 24 cores, 5.60 GHz boost clock, and 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it one of the most powerful desktop processors available, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM, 16.60 TFLOPS FP32, and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in the middle of the GPU performance spectrum. This asymmetry means the system excels at tasks like software compilation, video encoding, and CPU-based rendering, but sits at average levels for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The desktop form factor, combined with the Intel Socket 1851 platform and DDR5 memory support, makes this a flexible foundation for a workstation that can be upgraded over time. The CPU's active production status ensures long-term availability, while the GPU's end-of-life status suggests that a graphics card upgrade should be planned to fully utilize the CPU's capabilities. The 73rd combined percentile indicates that this build outperforms nearly three-quarters of all systems, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance is the defining characteristic that users should consider.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 915 MHz with a boost clock of 1410 MHz, delivering 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 1750 MHz memory clock with 14 Gbps effective speed is moderate for the GeForce 30-series, and the 8 GB capacity is the primary limitation for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s indicate balanced rasterization throughput for its class.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it outperforms half of all graphics cards but lags behind the top tier. The 46 RT cores support real-time ray tracing, though the Ampere generation's RT performance is older than newer architectures. The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features, which can help offset the GPU's raw performance deficit in supported games. The 220 W TDP and triple-slot design require substantial cooling, and the 1x 8-pin power connector is a constraint for overclocking or power-hungry variants. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is no longer manufactured, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensure compatibility with current software.