SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and Intel Arc B770 form a desktop build that pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile, giving a combined percentile of 73. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The 24 threads equal the 24 cores, meaning no simultaneous multithreading—each core handles a single thread. This design prioritizes raw core count over hyperthreading, which typically benefits workloads that scale linearly with cores, such as 3D rendering and video encoding.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. That large L3 pool helps with high-bandwidth tasks like database operations and scientific simulations. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a rare feature for a desktop part—this makes it attractive for small workstations that need data integrity.

The processor uses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, a dense design that contributes to its high frequency and efficiency. It connects to the system via Intel Socket 1851 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is enough for a modern GPU and a high-speed NVMe drive. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, a capable fallback for basic display output when no discrete GPU is installed.

Benchmark results show a processor with enormous multi-core muscle. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 48,945, while the single-core score is 6,909. That single-core figure is exceptionally high, indicating the boost clock is fully utilized. Cinebench R20 multicore is 20,556, and R15 multicore is 4,933. PassMark scores reinforce the pattern: multithreaded performance is 56,602, floating point math is 194,988, and integer math is 164,869. Data compression hits 602,121, encryption reaches 46,949, and extended instructions score 45,357. The single-thread PassMark score is 4,881. In terms of relative standing, the CPU’s average benchmark score is 75,488, which places it within 0.1% of the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373). It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 by 0.3% each—all rivals are essentially tied, but this is a desktop CPU competing with server-class EPYC parts, which is notable.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 is a clear indicator of heavy multi-threaded workloads—video rendering, 3D simulation, and software compilation will all benefit. The single-core score of 6,909 suggests snappy responsiveness in everyday applications, where clock speed matters. PassMark multithread at 56,602 and floating-point math at 194,988 show that the CPU is not just good at one type of task; it handles a broad mix of integer, floating-point, and memory-intensive operations well.

The GPU, the Intel Arc B770, has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, so its average benchmark score is 0 and its percentile is 50. That 50th percentile means the GPU is at the median of all GPUs—a mid-range performer. The combined percentile for the entire build is 73, which is pulled down by the GPU’s mediocre standing. The CPU’s 95th percentile shows that the processor is a top-tier part, but the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame-rate references are estimates from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-core score suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means frame rates will be constrained in graphically demanding games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 is exceptional, so in games that are CPU-bound (like esports titles), the Core Ultra 9 285 will not be the bottleneck. However, the Arc B770’s mid-range GPU performance (50th percentile) will likely cap frame rates in more demanding games, especially at higher resolutions. For 1080p and 1440p high-refresh, this pairing can push high frame rates in lighter titles, but 4K gaming would see the GPU struggle.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU with a multithread score of 56,302 can handle both game encoding and the streaming workload simultaneously. Software encoding will not tax the CPU heavily, leaving headroom for the game. The GPU has no dedicated encoder data, but the CPU’s strength makes it a viable streaming setup.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore of 48,945 is a strong indicator for video editing, especially with 4K or 8K timelines. The CPU can handle heavy preview rendering, and the 16 GB VRAM on the GPU will help with effects and compositing. The 512 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU supports high-resolution textures and large project assets.

3D rendering: With 24 physical cores and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945, this CPU is a render monster. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance is moderate for real-time viewport but adequate for final frame rendering if the software uses CUDA or OptiX. The 32 RT cores on the GPU will accelerate ray tracing in supported apps.

Software development: Compiling code uses multiple cores, and the CPU’s multithread score of 56,302 will cut compile times. The single-core score of 6,909 also speeds up code analysis and IDE responsiveness. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is useful for GPU-accelerated debugging or machine learning development.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance is overkill for typical office tasks, but it ensures no lag in spreadsheets, browsing, or virtual meetings. The GPU’s 50th percentile performance is more than enough for 2D applications and light photo editing. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also means it runs cool and quiet in a typical office environment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA-1851 socket for the Core Ultra Series 2. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and has a 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is a feature more commonly seen in server platforms—this makes the CPU suitable for a small workstation that needs error-correcting memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which can connect to a high-end GPU and a fast NVMe drive. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the interface is compatible.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core part, meaning a modest air cooler will suffice. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. That 550 W figure is for the entire system, and it leaves headroom for the CPU’s 65 W and other components. If you later upgrade to a more powerful GPU, you would need to check the PSU, but the current setup is well within the 550 W recommendation. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments, but the boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU, as the CPU has a 95th percentile while the GPU sits at 50th percentile. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ready for a future high-end GPU, but the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0, which is backward-compatible. The socket 1851 will likely support future Core Ultra processors, so a CPU upgrade may be possible without a motherboard change.

Who Should Build It

The Core Ultra 9 285 is aimed at enthusiasts and professionals who need heavy multi-threaded processing. The 24 cores and 24 threads make it a natural fit for content creators who render videos, 3D artists, software developers compiling large projects, and scientists running simulations. The CPU’s 95th percentile and its near-tie with EPYC server processors in benchmarks show it can handle server-like workloads.

The GPU’s 50th percentile means the build is not for hardcore 4K gamers. It is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates, where the CPU’s strong single-core performance can push high FPS. For gamers who play esports titles, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. For those who play AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU will be the bottleneck, but it will still deliver playable frame rates.

The build is also a good choice for a small business workstation, thanks to the ECC memory support and the CPU’s high multi-thread performance. Students who need to run virtual machines or compile code will find the CPU fast, and the GPU can handle light 3D modeling and CAD. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is useful for machine learning inference or video processing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B770 pairing, so all frame-rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 95th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile indicate that the GPU is the primary limiter in gaming. For CPU-bound games (e.g., esports), the CPU can deliver high frame rates, but for GPU-bound games, the GPU will cap the FPS.

At 1080p, the Arc B770 can likely produce high frame rates in most titles, especially with settings lowered from Ultra. The 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are ample for 1080p textures. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with Ultra settings in AAA games, but with medium or high settings, it can still deliver a smooth experience. At 4K, the GPU’s mid-range performance will limit frame rates, making it better to drop to 1440p or adjust settings.

The CPU’s single-core score of 6,909 ensures that the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming, even at high refresh rates. The 24 cores will also help with background tasks like streaming or recording, which can reduce the impact on gaming performance. Overall, this pairing is best suited for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming, not for 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core processor.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is present, making it suitable for workstation and server applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM size?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which is enough for the GPU’s 225 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for other devices.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the CPU’s multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 95th-percentile CPU with a 50th-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 73. The Core Ultra 9 285 is a top-tier desktop processor, while the Arc B770 is a mid-range GPU. The system is unbalanced—the CPU is far stronger than the GPU—which makes it a great choice for CPU-intensive tasks like rendering and video editing, but not ideal for GPU-heavy workloads like 4K gaming or GPU rendering. The CPU’s 95th percentile shows it is among the best processors, and the GPU’s 50th percentile is average. This is a desktop-class system, so it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming rig.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck because it has a lower percentile. The CPU’s high single-core score (6,909) and multi-core score (48,945) will not be fully utilized in most games, which are typically GPU-bound. However, in CPU-heavy tasks like video rendering, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the dominant performer, and the GPU will be secondary.

The combined percentile of 73 is pulled down by the GPU’s average performance. The CPU’s high percentile means that if you upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model, the system’s overall performance would rise significantly. Conversely, the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any workload—even the most demanding multi-threaded tasks. The GPU’s 50th percentile means it will hold back the CPU in GPU-bound scenarios, but the CPU can handle any workload you throw at it.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, the second generation of Intel’s discrete GPU. It uses a 5 nm TSMC process and a 368 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2100 MHz, and the boost clock is 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture units, and 128 ROPs. It also has 32 RT cores for hardware ray tracing.

Compute performance is 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32, and 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a dual-slot design and requires a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector, with a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports.

The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is large, which helps with high-resolution textures and large models. The 512 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing performance, but the overall GPU percentile is 50, meaning it is an average performer in the broader GPU landscape. The lack of a benchmark score in the FACT PACK means we cannot quantify its exact standing, but the 50th percentile indicates a mid-range part.

The GPU is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as light 3D rendering and video editing. Its 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 is not extreme, but it is enough for many tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong point, allowing for large textures and deep learning models. The GPU’s 225 W TDP is moderate, and the 550 W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for the entire system.