SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a top-tier 24-core processor with a mainstream 12GB GPU. The dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate statements are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The combined percentile of 82 places this build well above average, but the CPU's 95th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile reveals a notable performance gap that shapes every workload analysis.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3nm TSMC process. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is a modest 65W. Cache architecture includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 and offers 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark scores show exceptional multi-core performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 48,945 points, while single-core reaches 6,909. Cinebench R20 multi-core is 20,556, single-core 2,901. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 4,933, single-core 696. PassMark scores reinforce this: multithread score is 56,602, single-thread 4,881, integer math 164,869, floating point math 194,988, data compression 602,121, data encryption 46,949, extended instructions 45,357, and physics 3,598. The average benchmark score is 75,488, placing the CPU in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Against its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 285 is essentially tied. It scores 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 8224P, 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 4545P, 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755. These are server and prosumer chips, indicating the 285 performs at a level comparable to enterprise silicon. The 24-core design with no simultaneous multithreading means each thread gets dedicated core resources, which benefits workloads that scale linearly with core count, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computations.

The 65W TDP is remarkable for a 24-core processor, making it a low-power but high-throughput option. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is not exceptional for a desktop CPU, but the high core count compensates in many parallel tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs provides basic display output, though it is not intended for demanding rendering.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage (Arc 5). It is manufactured on a 5nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It includes 20 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The base and boost clock are both 2,670 MHz, with memory clock at 2,375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,068, Geekbench OpenCL at 92,821, Vulkan at 109,672, PassMark DirectX 10 at 76, DirectX 11 at 128, DirectX 12 at 76, DirectX 9 at 183, G2D at 709, G3D at 15,748, and GPU compute at 7,729. The average benchmark score is 23,021, placing the GPU in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

Nearest rivals show the B580's performance is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (0.2% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (0.7% lower), and the NVIDIA P106-100 (1.0% lower). The RTX 3080 is historically a high-end card, but its average score here is nearly identical to the B580, suggesting the B580 offers comparable aggregate performance. The 12 GB VRAM at 456 GB/s bandwidth is ample for modern textures and moderate resolutions. The 20 ray-tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX Raytracing, though the FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS is modest compared to high-end GPUs.

The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is narrower than the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, but the 456 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU's data needs. The dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector is typical for this class. The suggested PSU of 450W indicates modest power draw relative to the CPU's 65W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 is exceptionally high, placing it in the top 5% of all CPUs. Its single-core score of 6,909 also ranks highly, ensuring snappy response in lightly threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 and integer math of 164,869 underscore strong compute capabilities. The CPU's 95th percentile means it outperforms 95% of all tested processors, a level typical for workstation-grade silicon.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 is a mid-tier result; the PassMark G3D score of 15,748 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 109,672 align with the 68th percentile. This means the B580 is better than two-thirds of all GPUs, but it is not a top-tier performer. The combined percentile of 82 indicates that the build as a whole sits in the top 18% of all systems, but the CPU is clearly the stronger component.

When interpreted together, the CPU can easily feed the GPU in most gaming and rendering tasks. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores ensure that it will not bottleneck the GPU in typical workloads. However, the GPU's 68th percentile suggests that it will be the limiting factor in GPU-intensive scenarios like high-fidelity gaming or GPU rendering. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are based on percentile positions and benchmark scores, not actual frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 95th percentile versus the GPU's 68th percentile creates a clear imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, scientific simulations, or data processing—the CPU will deliver near-top-tier performance while the GPU remains underutilized. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated 3D rendering, the GPU will cap overall throughput. The combined percentile of 82 reflects the GPU's lower standing; the CPU's raw power is not fully utilized when the GPU is saturated.

The 65W TDP of the CPU and 190W TDP of the GPU mean that the system's total power draw is modest, so the GPU is unlikely to be thermally constrained. The suggested PSU of 450W provides headroom for both components. However, the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while adequate, does not match the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, but this does not affect FPS in most titles because the GPU's memory bandwidth is the limiting factor.

In gaming, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p high settings, but the GPU's 68th percentile suggests it will struggle with 4K or ultra-high refresh rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that game logic and physics will be handled smoothly, so the GPU will be the bottleneck at high resolutions. In content creation, the CPU's multi-thread score of 48,945 in Cinebench R23 makes it a powerful render engine for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate GPU renderers, but the GPU will limit ray-traced scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost and 24 cores will handle game logic and background tasks, but the GPU's 68th percentile means it cannot sustain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in demanding titles. At 1080p, the GPU can deliver high frame rates in most games, but the lack of measured FPS prevents an exact claim. The 12 GB VRAM ensures textures at 1080p and 1440p are not a concern.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and high multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 48,945) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 20 ray-tracing cores do not affect streaming, but its performance tier is sufficient for encoding via GPU if the software supports it. The CPU's 65W TDP keeps power consumption low during streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's high multi-thread performance accelerates timeline rendering and export in software like Premiere Pro, which can use multiple cores. The GPU's 456 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM handle effects and color grading, but the GPU's 68th percentile means it is not a top-tier accelerator for GPU-accelerated effects. The combination is balanced for 1080p and 1440p editing.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will see strong performance from the 24-core CPU. The GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate GPU rendering, but the GPU is slower than top-tier cards, so mixed CPU/GPU rendering will be CPU-bound. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderate scenes.

Software development: The CPU's single-core score of 6,909 and multi-core of 48,945 make compilation and build times short. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large data structures. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but the integrated GPU can provide display output if the discrete GPU is used for compute.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for office tasks, but its 65W TDP makes it efficient. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 68th percentile are more than enough for spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing. The system's combined 82nd percentile ensures smooth multitasking.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but do not require top-tier GPU performance. The 95th percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run CPU-bound workloads. The GPU's 68th percentile is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, making it a solid choice for mainstream gamers who prioritize CPU performance for tasks like streaming or compiling. Small business workstations that run heavy data processing, virtualization, or engineering simulations will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread muscle. The 65W TDP also makes it suitable for users who want a high-performance system without a high power bill.

The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and its ray-tracing cores enable some ray-traced effects. However, users who demand 4K gaming or high-refresh ultra settings should consider a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile makes it a future-proof investment, while the GPU's 68th percentile is a mid-range choice that may need an upgrade within a few years.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. It supports DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC capability. The CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for a high-speed NVMe SSD or a future GPU. The Arc B580 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it will run at x8 bandwidth, but that is not a bottleneck for its performance class. The suggested PSU of 450W is ample for the CPU's 65W TDP and GPU's 190W TDP, leaving headroom for additional drives.

A sensible next upgrade is to replace the GPU with a higher-performance model that can match the CPU's 95th percentile. The CPU's 24 cores and high clock speeds will remain relevant for years, so a GPU upgrade would unlock more of the CPU's potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. Alternatively, users can add more DDR5 memory to the dual-channel setup to increase bandwidth beyond the 102.4 GB/s, though the current bandwidth is already adequate. The CPU's integrated graphics can be used as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (CPU) and Intel Arc B580 (GPU). The CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 68th percentile produce a combined percentile of 82, indicating a high-performance system overall. The CPU is a top-tier 24-core processor with a low 65W TDP, while the GPU is a mid-range 12GB card with a 68th percentile score. The pairing is CPU-dominant, meaning the CPU is the stronger component in most scenarios. The build is suitable for workloads that leverage many cores, such as video rendering, software development, and scientific computing, while the GPU provides solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming estimates are based on benchmark scores, not direct measurements, but the 82nd percentile suggests a well-rounded system.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM size and type?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, based on the CPU's 95th and GPU's 68th percentiles.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all FPS estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU TDP is 65W, and the GPU suggests a 450W PSU.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds