SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B570: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship Arrow Lake desktop processor with Intel's mid-range Battlemage graphics card, creating a desktop system that occupies a distinctive position in the benchmark hierarchy. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 80. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to examine what this configuration offers across rendering, gaming, productivity, and content creation workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and represents the Arc 5 tier within Intel's graphics lineup. The chip, designated BMG-G21, is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC and contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. This places the B570 as a substantial mid-range GPU with modern architectural features.

Memory configuration is notable for the segment: 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective data rate. This memory capacity is particularly relevant for modern games and rendering workloads that increasingly exceed 8 GB of VRAM at higher resolutions and texture quality settings. The 160-bit bus does constrain bandwidth compared to wider-memory designs, but 380.0 GB/s remains a competitive figure for the GPU's performance class.

Clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which simplifies power and thermal behavior. The GPU's compute resources include 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s indicate balanced throughput for rasterization-heavy workloads. Floating-point performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, suggesting strong compute capability for AI-assisted rendering and certain productivity tasks.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 18 dedicated RT cores. This enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the B570's position at the 65th percentile among all GPUs suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing performer. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs and feature sets.

Benchmark results provide a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 reflects the GPU's performance under modern DirectX 12 workloads. Geekbench scores are more robust: 83514 in OpenCL and 96844 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance in cross-platform APIs. PassMark scores show 14195 for G3D (direct 3D graphics) and 7281 for GPU compute. The DirectX-specific PassMark scores are notably lower — 65 for DX10, 118 for DX11, 72 for DX12, and 164 for DX9 — which may reflect driver optimization or benchmark methodology rather than raw capability. The G2D score of 661 indicates moderate 2D performance.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database place the B570 in interesting company. It scores 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750, 0.4% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. This clustering suggests the B570 performs competitively with a range of previous-generation discrete GPUs across both desktop and mobile segments.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 75488, positioning it at the 95th percentile among all processors. This is a high ranking that indicates top-tier performance, though it is not at the absolute peak. The nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582 (0.1% higher), the AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75716 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738 (0.3% higher). The deltaPct values are all within ±0.3%, meaning these five processors are effectively tied in aggregate benchmark performance. This tight clustering suggests the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers performance comparable to server-class EPYC parts and the latest Ryzen PRO chips.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU shows strong scaling. The R15 multicore score of 4933 and single-core score of 696 demonstrate solid per-thread performance. R20 results jump to 20556 multicore and 2901 single-core. R23, the most demanding of the three, shows 48945 multicore and 6909 single-core. The single-core scores are consistently strong, indicating good per-thread efficiency, while the multicore scores show the benefit of 24 cores and 24 threads.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths. Data compression scores 602121, data encryption scores 46949, and extended instructions score 45357. Floating-point math reaches 194988, while integer math hits 164869. The multithread score is 56602, and physics scores 3598. The single-thread score is 4881. The find prime numbers score of 459 is notably lower, suggesting this workload does not suit the architecture. Random string sorting scores 73651.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 80, reflecting the CPU's stronger relative position. The GPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, indicating a tightly contested performance tier. The RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% higher), Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% lower), Quadro M4000M (20480, 0.4% higher), and Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.5% lower) bracket the B570's performance closely.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger, relative to its peers, than the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile creates an imbalance where the processor is clearly the dominant component in the pairing. This has implications for workload distribution, as discussed in the balance section below.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Consequently, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct gameplay measurements.

To estimate gaming performance, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs provides a starting reference point. The B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the same performance tier as the RTX 3070 Mobile, Arc A750, Quadro M4000M, and Radeon R9 M390X. These GPUs represent solid mid-range capability, typically capable of 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p gaming at medium settings in modern titles.

The 10 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures. At 4K resolution, the 160-bit memory bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors, and the GPU's raw compute throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 suggests 4K performance would require reduced settings in demanding titles. The 18 RT cores enable ray tracing, but RT workloads will likely require lower resolutions or settings to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's gaming relevance comes through its 95th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance. The R23 single-core score of 6909 and PassMark single-thread score of 4881 indicate excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming workloads that often depend on single-thread speed. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads also provide ample headroom for background tasks, streaming, and multi-tasking while gaming.

Estimated frame rates should be considered with the caveat that they are derived from synthetic benchmarks rather than actual game tests. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the combination of a high-percentile CPU and mid-range GPU should support high refresh rates. For AAA titles at 1440p, medium to high settings are plausible estimates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and lower settings or upscaling techniques would be necessary.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between CPU and GPU in this system is asymmetric. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile creates a situation where the processor has significantly more relative headroom than the graphics card. This asymmetry means that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 75488 is more than 3.6 times the GPU's average score of 20556. This disparity does not directly translate to gaming performance, where the GPU typically dominates frame rate calculations, but it indicates that the CPU will rarely be the constraint in graphics-heavy workloads. The CPU's nearest rivals are server-class EPYC processors and Ryzen PRO chips, all within 0.3% of its score, confirming its position near the top of the processor hierarchy.

In GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution gaming, 3D rendering, or video encoding with hardware acceleration, the B570 will determine performance. Its 65th percentile ranking means roughly one-third of GPUs in the database outperform it, and the tight clustering of its nearest rivals (±0.5%) suggests that upgrading to a higher-tier GPU could yield meaningful gains.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, physics simulation, or heavy multi-threaded productivity tasks, the Core Ultra 9 285 will excel without straining. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 indicate substantial parallel processing capability. The 95th percentile ranking means only 5% of processors in the database score higher.

FPS scaling evidence comes from the GPU's benchmark pattern. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 is relatively modest, while Geekbench Vulkan at 96844 and OpenCL at 83514 are stronger. This suggests the GPU performs better in compute-oriented workloads than in pure rasterization. Games that rely heavily on traditional rasterization may not scale as well as compute-heavy applications.

The practical implication is that this system is better suited for CPU-intensive workloads with moderate GPU demands than for GPU-bound high-refresh gaming. Users prioritizing gaming performance would see more benefit from upgrading the GPU, while the CPU can handle essentially any workload without becoming a bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75488. Its nearest rivals are within 0.3% of its score, including the AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The B570's average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. It performs within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X.

Q: What memory configuration does the GPU use?

A: The Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, with 19 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 80, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 65th percentile positions.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The Arc B570 is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The combination of a 95th percentile CPU and 65th percentile GPU serves distinct user profiles. The CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance — demonstrated by Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and PassMark multithread score of 56602 — makes this system well-suited for professionals who spend significant time in CPU-intensive applications.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 602121 and encryption score of 46949 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 194988 supports scientific computing and simulation workloads.

Software developers will find the CPU's compilation capabilities substantial. The extended instructions score of 45357 and integer math score of 164869 point to efficient code execution. The 65W TDP means this processing power comes with relatively modest power requirements, which could benefit small business workstations or multi-system environments.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions represent a target audience, though the GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggests frame rates will be solid rather than exceptional. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for modern game textures at these resolutions. Gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 4K would need a higher-tier GPU.

Students and office workers performing general productivity tasks would find this system over-provisioned, but the CPU's efficiency at 65W TDP makes it a capable workstation for academic workloads such as data analysis, programming assignments, or research computing.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and provides 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. The platform includes ECC memory support, which is valuable for workstation reliability.

PCIe connectivity comes through Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for high-speed storage devices and expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements. A future GPU upgrade could take advantage of PCIe Gen 5 lanes if the new card supports it.

The CPU's TDP is 65W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor. The GPU has a TDP of 150W, and the suggested PSU is 450W. This creates significant power supply headroom — a 450W PSU can comfortably handle the combined 215W of CPU and GPU power draw, leaving room for other components and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means it has substantial headroom to support a more powerful graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU in a higher percentile tier would better balance the system for gaming at higher resolutions or settings. The existing PCIe 4.0 x8 slot would accommodate most modern GPUs, and the 450W PSU would need to be reassessed based on the new card's requirements.

The memory configuration could also be upgraded. The dual-channel DDR5 support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is solid, but adding higher-capacity or higher-speed memory modules could benefit memory-intensive workloads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and Intel Arc B570. The system's overall combined percentile is 80, placing it in the upper quintile of all systems in the database. This is a high-tier configuration, though not at the absolute peak.

The CPU is the dominant component. Its 95th percentile ranking places it among the top 5% of processors, alongside server-class EPYC parts and the latest Ryzen PRO chips. This is flagship-level desktop performance. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking is respectable but not exceptional, placing it in the mid-to-upper range of graphics cards.

The class is explicitly desktop, with the CPU's market segment also listed as Desktop. The GPU is a dual-slot card, measuring 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. The integrated graphics on the CPU — Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU — provide a fallback display output should the discrete GPU be unavailable.

The build tier from the percentiles suggests a system that excels at CPU-bound workloads while providing competent graphics performance. It is not a maximal gaming rig, but it is a powerful workstation-capable desktop. The CPU's low 65W TDP is noteworthy for a 24-core part, making this a relatively efficient high-performance desktop configuration.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The process node is among the most advanced available, contributing to the CPU's performance-per-watt characteristics.

The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading. This means each core handles one thread, which is a design choice that can benefit certain workloads by reducing scheduling overhead. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The 65W TDP is notably low for a 24-core desktop processor, indicating high efficiency. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU enables fast storage and expansion.

Benchmark scores demonstrate the CPU's capabilities across different workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and single-core score of 6909 show strong scaling from single-thread to multi-thread performance. The R15 and R20 scores follow this pattern, with multicore scores of 4933 and 20556 respectively, and single-core scores of 696 and 2901.

PassMark scores provide additional workload-specific insights. Data compression at 602121 is exceptionally high, suggesting the CPU excels at archiving and file-compression tasks. Data encryption at 46949 indicates strong cryptographic performance. Floating-point math at 194988 is robust, supporting scientific and engineering computations. Integer math at 164869 is also strong. The multithread score of 56602 confirms the CPU's parallel processing capability.

The find prime numbers score of 459 is comparatively weak, which may indicate that this particular workload does not map efficiently to the architecture. This is a specialized test, and its lower score does not detract from the CPU's overall strong performance.

Real-world workloads that benefit from this CPU include software compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, data analysis, virtualization, and any multi-threaded productivity task. The high single-core performance also ensures responsive day-to-day usage and strong performance in single-threaded applications.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 6909, PassMark single-thread 4881) provide excellent frame generation capability. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking means 1080p high-refresh gaming is a realistic estimate, with 1440p requiring adjusted settings. The 10 GB VRAM supports modern game textures at these resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 56602 indicates the CPU can handle encoding workloads without compromising game performance. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU could also assist with encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 48945) accelerates export and rendering tasks. Data compression score of 602121 is beneficial for codec operations. The GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 83514, Vulkan 96844) can accelerate effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be exceptionally fast given the 95th percentile ranking. GPU-based rendering will be moderate, with the B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 providing competent but not top-tier performance. The 18 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though at reduced performance levels.

Software development: Compilation times will be short given the CPU's high integer math score of 164869 and multithread capability. The extended instructions score of 45357 supports modern instruction sets. The 65W TDP means developers can run this system for extended periods with manageable power consumption.

Student and office work: This system is substantially over-provisioned for typical productivity tasks. However, the 65W TDP makes it an efficient choice for long work sessions. Students in engineering, data science, or research fields will benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities, while the GPU handles standard display and graphics requirements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds