SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors in a 243 mm² die. This is a significant architectural shift from previous Intel generations, moving to the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The chip carries a 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a 24-core flagship, and this efficiency profile suggests the processor can sustain high performance without requiring extreme cooling solutions.

The benchmark results are exceptional across both synthetic and real-world workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 48,945 points in multi-core and 6,909 in single-core. The single-core figure represents a strong result that places it among the fastest desktop chips available, while the multi-core score indicates that the 24-core configuration scales effectively under full load. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 4,933 multi-core and 696 single-core. These results demonstrate consistent performance across different rendering workloads, with the multi-core scaling maintaining near-linear efficiency.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specialized workloads. The multithread score of 56,602 is supported by strong individual tests: integer math at 164,869, floating-point math at 194,988, and extended instructions at 45,357. Data compression scores 602,121, while data encryption reaches 46,949. The find prime numbers test scores 459, which is a lower score relative to the other tests but reflects the specific nature of that workload. Random string sorting achieves 73,651, and physics simulation scores 3,598. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,881 confirms the processor's strength in lightly threaded applications.

The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. Compared to its nearest rivals, the AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582 with a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Core Ultra 9 285 is essentially tied with that server-class chip. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373 with a delta of 0.2%, also a near tie. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75,716 with a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738 with a delta of -0.3%. These figures tell a clear story: the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers performance that matches or slightly exceeds several high-end server and workstation processors, despite being designed for the desktop segment.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics solution is Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which can handle basic display output and light graphics tasks without a discrete GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This GPU is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 7 family) and has been in production since late 2022, though it is now marked as end-of-life with the Battlemage successor on the horizon. The base clock runs at 2050 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz, and memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a solid amount of memory bandwidth for a mid-range GPU, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in the most demanding modern titles at high resolutions. The GPU packs 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. There are 28 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the implementation is first-generation Intel and not as mature as competitors. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS for FP16 (at 2:1 ratio).

In benchmark results, the Arc A750 performs competitively within its class. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test scores 2,612. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98,554, and Vulkan scores 85,631. PassMark results show G3D at 12,534, G2D at 732, and GPU compute at 5,368. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 tests score 65, 72, and 70 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 181. These numbers indicate that the GPU handles modern APIs well but shows some weakness in older DirectX versions.

The GPU sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,582. Nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 at 20,556 with a delta of 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 with a delta of 0.2%, the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 with a delta of -0.4%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20,480 with a delta of 0.5%. These deltas are all within 0.5%, meaning the Arc A750 is essentially performance-equivalent to this group. The fact that an Intel desktop GPU matches a mobile RTX 3070 in average score is notable, though the comparison is against a mobile variant rather than the desktop version.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers all modern gaming and compute APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, providing flexible multi-monitor support. The power requirements are 225 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W, and it requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The dual-slot design and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are standard for this class.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. This socket represents a new platform generation, meaning that upgrades from older Intel sockets will require a new motherboard. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the memory bandwidth is rated at 102.4 GB/s. For users building a new system, this platform provides modern memory support and the ability to use ECC modules if desired.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or more Gen 5 NVMe drives. The Arc A750 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which will run at full bandwidth on this platform. For future upgrades, the Gen 5 lanes ensure that a newer GPU with Gen 5 support will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The platform does not have an unlocked multiplier, as indicated by "multiplierUnlocked: false," so overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not available. This is a notable limitation for enthusiasts, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz is already high.

The power envelope is quite reasonable for the performance on offer. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 225 W TDP, for a combined 290 W of component power. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 550 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system including drives, fans, and other peripherals. A quality 550 W PSU would be sufficient for this build, and users who want headroom for future upgrades might consider a higher-wattage unit, though that is not strictly necessary based on the data.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve the GPU, given that the CPU is already at the top of the desktop performance tier. The Arc A750's 8 GB VRAM is the most likely limiting factor in modern games at high settings, so upgrading to a GPU with more memory and higher raw performance would extend the system's gaming lifespan. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory ensure that the motherboard and CPU will not be a bottleneck for several years. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU also provides a fallback display output for troubleshooting or basic use without the discrete GPU.

# Gaming Performance

Important note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 66th percentile ranking, the gaming performance of this combination is expected to be solid at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in demanding titles. The CPU's exceptional single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame rates will not be constrained by processor throughput in most games, as modern titles rarely require more than a fraction of this processing power. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth position it as a capable mid-range performer.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A750 should deliver high frame rates in most games, with the CPU providing ample headroom for high-refresh displays. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 suggests the GPU can handle modern DX12 titles well. The PassMark G3D score of 12,534 is consistent with a GPU that performs competitively against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, so users can expect similar frame rates to that mobile GPU. However, the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture quality to be reduced in the most demanding games, especially those with high-resolution texture packs.

At 1440p, the GPU will be under more pressure, and frame rates will likely drop compared to 1080p, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should help maintain playable performance. The 256-bit memory bus is a strength for this class. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute throughput will likely be insufficient for ultra settings in modern AAA titles, and users should expect to reduce settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Ray tracing performance will be a weaker point, as the 28 RT cores represent Intel's first-generation implementation. Games with heavy ray tracing effects may see significant frame rate drops, and users may prefer to disable ray tracing or use lower quality settings. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with all modern ray-traced titles, but the performance may not match the equivalent NVIDIA or AMD offerings.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 9 285 and the Arc A750 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 66th percentile. This means that in gaming workloads, the GPU will almost always be the limiting component. The CPU is capable of feeding frames far faster than the GPU can render them, so the Arc A750 will be the bottleneck in nearly every gaming scenario.

This imbalance is not necessarily a problem, as it means the system has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades. The CPU's performance is so far ahead of the GPU that upgrading to a much faster graphics card would be a straightforward way to improve gaming performance without any CPU bottleneck. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering, the CPU's 24 cores and high multi-threaded scores (48,945 in Cinebench R23) will dominate, and the GPU will have minimal impact.

For compute workloads that use both components, such as GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning, the balance is more even, but the GPU's 5,368 PassMark compute score indicates that it is not a high-end compute part. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 56,602 is roughly ten times the GPU's compute score, which shows the CPU's dominance in general-purpose processing.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (4,881 in PassMark single-thread) is more than sufficient for gaming, so lower resolutions or lower graphics settings will not improve frame rates beyond what the GPU can deliver. The bottleneck is consistent across resolutions, which is typical for a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU.

# Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity workloads and are willing to accept mid-range gaming performance. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 24-core processor with its 48,945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The data compression score of 602,121 and encryption score of 46,949 also make it suitable for database work and file archiving.

Gamers at 1080p who play competitive titles will find the Arc A750 sufficient, especially given the CPU's ability to maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it will handle most games at medium to high settings, but enthusiasts seeking maximum graphics quality at 1440p or 4K should consider a more powerful GPU.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 6,909 in Cinebench R23, which speeds up compilation times and code analysis. Students and small business users with demanding computational needs will find the system responsive, though the integrated graphics could serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system's 65 W CPU TDP makes it power-efficient for a workstation class machine, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-critical work.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance ensures high frame rates in competitive titles, and the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth rendering. The GPU will limit performance in the most demanding games, but for esports and fast-paced shooters, the system is well-suited to 144 Hz or higher displays.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU can handle game capture, encoding, and streaming simultaneously without impacting game performance. The CPU's multi-thread score of 56,602 in PassMark provides ample headroom for software encoding, and the GPU's hardware resources can be dedicated to rendering.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 indicates powerful rendering capability for timeline playback and export. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS compute can assist with effects and color grading, though large 4K projects may benefit from more VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in CPU-based rendering, with PassMark floating-point math at 194,988. The GPU can accelerate GPU-based renderers, but its compute score of 5,368 is modest, so CPU rendering will be the primary strength.

Software development: The single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compile times for single-threaded build steps, while the 24 cores handle parallel builds efficiently. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases.

Student and office work: This system is overpowered for basic office tasks, but the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU can handle display output, and the CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP means low power consumption during light workloads.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking relative to other processors?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. It is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, all within 0.3% delta.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc A750 ranks in the 66th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 20,582. It is within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, AMD Radeon R9 M390X, and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported. The boost clock is 5.60 GHz, which is set at the factory.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: Is the GPU VRAM sufficient for modern games?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but may require reduced textures at 1440p in the most demanding titles.

Q: What is the power requirement for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. It requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this system?

A: No, there are no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined system ranks in the 81st percentile of all desktop builds, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional performance. The Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores of 48,945 multi-core and 6,909 single-core are flagship-level results. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 and single-thread score of 4,881 further confirm its position at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy.

The Arc A750 achieves an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 and PassMark G3D score of 12,534 are consistent with a mid-range GPU that performs within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 indicate solid compute performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier component that will remain relevant for years, while the GPU is a mid-range part that is already at the end of its production life. The 81st combined percentile reflects this imbalance, with the CPU pulling the overall score up significantly. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and are satisfied with mid-range gaming performance, this combination offers a strong foundation with a clear upgrade path for the GPU. The system's launch MSRP for the CPU is $579, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $289 USD.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds