SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and Intel Arc A730M pairing represents a high-end mobile configuration aimed at users who need substantial multi-threaded compute power alongside a dedicated graphics solution. The benchmark data shows a CPU that sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU at the 84th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 89 for this laptop platform. This section breaks down the CPU's architecture, its measured performance, and what those numbers indicate for demanding workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant for mobile platforms. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and can boost up to 5.40 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,589 points in the multi-core test and 2,204 points in the single-core test. The multi-core result indicates exceptional parallel processing capability, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score of 2,204 is strong for mobile hardware, suggesting responsive everyday use and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 scores follow a similar pattern: 19,899 multi-core and 2,809 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 5,619.5 multi-core and 334 single-core.

Geekbench results further corroborate the dual strengths of this chip: 20,795 in multi-core and 2,458 in single-core. These scores suggest the 275HX excels in both heavily threaded rendering tasks and in workloads that depend on single-thread responsiveness, such as typical office productivity or web browsing. PassMark tests provide additional insight into specific workload types. The multi-thread score is 55,759, with integer math at 155,218 and floating-point math at 191,186. Data compression scores 608,381, while encryption hits 47,112 and extended instructions reach 47,016. Random string sorting scores 74,320, and physics processing is at 3,338. The single-thread PassMark score is 4,713.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 67,469. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a close contest. It trails the Intel Xeon w5-3525 by 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 4484PX by 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX by 0.6%. It leads the Intel Xeon 6515P by 0.7%. These deltas are marginal, meaning the 275HX trades blows with workstation-class desktop processors despite being a mobile part, proof of the efficiency of the Arrow Lake architecture at a 55 W TDP.

For real-world workloads, the 24 threads are well-suited for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The high floating-point math score of 191,186 indicates strong performance in scientific computing and simulation tasks. The data compression score of 608,381 suggests significant capability in archiving and database operations. While the chip has an unlocked multiplier, the mobile platform may limit overclocking headroom. The integrated graphics are the Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which can handle basic display output and light GPU-accelerated tasks, but the dedicated A730M handles intensive graphics work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a ball-grid array package soldered directly to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is a permanent part of the laptop's system board. The platform supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The memory support does not include ECC, which is typical for consumer and enthusiast mobile platforms. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPU enclosures, though the latter depends on the specific laptop's implementation.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A730M, has a TDP of 80 W and connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP sum to 135 W, which is modest for a high-performance laptop. This leaves considerable power headroom for the rest of the system, including memory, storage, and display, within a typical 150-200 W mobile power envelope. The A730M is listed as having a slot width of "IGP," which is unusual for a discrete GPU and may indicate a compact or embedded design, but its 80 W TDP suggests a dedicated cooling solution is required.

A sensible next upgrade for a system with this CPU would be to ensure the memory is running at the highest supported DDR5 speed for the platform, as the dual-channel 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed resource. Storage upgrades are viable via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for the fastest available NVMe drives. For the GPU, given that the A730M is end-of-life, a future upgrade would require a new laptop with a newer generation mobile GPU. The platform itself is a dead-end for component swaps, so the primary upgrade path is external peripherals or storage, not internal compute hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning it does not support simultaneous multithreading (SMT) or Hyper-Threading.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 67,469. It is 0.3% slower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525, 0.5% slower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX, and 0.6% slower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, but 0.7% faster than the Intel Xeon 6515P.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop configuration is 89, indicating it performs better than 89% of all measured CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and modern APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc A730M has 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It also has a pixel rate of 196.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.6 GTexel/s.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count for the GPU?

A: The GPU is built on a 6 nm process by TSMC, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.40 GHz from a base clock of 2.70 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W.

Who Should Build It

The benchmark data positions this laptop configuration as a versatile tool for professionals and enthusiasts who require heavy compute without being tied to a desktop. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or complex simulations, where the 24 threads and high floating-point math score of 191,186 will directly translate to reduced render times. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the multi-thread score of 55,759 in PassMark, while the data encryption score of 47,112 indicates capability in security-related tasks.

Gamers at high resolutions, particularly 1440p or 4K, will find the GPU's 84th percentile performance adequate, though the lack of measured FPS data means the ceiling is uncertain. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,713 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics calculations are handled swiftly, preventing CPU bottlenecks in most titles. Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the CPU's multi-core prowess for MATLAB, Python, or CAD workloads, while the 12 GB VRAM on the GPU provides enough capacity for moderate machine learning model training and large dataset visualization.

Small business workstations handling database operations will see strong performance from the data compression score of 608,381, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data sets. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is also beneficial for professionals working with large textures in architectural visualization or video editing timelines. However, the end-of-life status of the GPU means that driver optimizations may taper off, so buyers should weigh the raw performance against potential future software support. For users who need a single machine for both demanding compute and gaming, this pairing offers a balanced profile, with the CPU often being the star performer.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation from the Arc 7 Mobile series. The chip, codenamed DG2-512, is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 raster output units (ROPs). The GPU operates at a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It features 24 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing, though tensor cores are not specified in the data.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, running at 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes but is moderate compared to the highest-end mobile GPUs. The GPU's pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS for FP16, with the latter using a 2:1 ratio.

In benchmark tests, the A730M scores 1,732 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 70,352 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 64,693 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 45,592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the performance is tightly clustered. It is 0.5% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, and 0.8% slower than the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation, and 1% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A2000. These small deltas suggest the A730M sits in a competitive mid-to-high tier for mobile graphics.

The 12 GB VRAM is a notable advantage for rendering workloads, as it allows larger models and scenes to reside in memory without spilling to slower system RAM. The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which, combined with DirectX 12 Ultimate support, enables modern visual effects like ray-traced reflections and shadows. The Vulkan 1.4 support also ensures compatibility with a wide range of current game engines and professional applications. The GPU's TDP of 80 W is relatively high for a mobile part, indicating that adequate cooling is necessary to maintain boost clocks under sustained load.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 84th percentile ranking and the CPU's 94th percentile ranking suggest a system capable of high frame rates in most titles, but the actual FPS will vary based on game optimization and driver maturity.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,732 and its average benchmark score of 45,592, this configuration is likely to handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at very high frame rates, even at 1080p or 1440p, due to the strong single-thread CPU performance. For AAA games at 1440p, the A730M's 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth should provide good texture detail and stable frame rates, though ultra settings may require lowering some options to maintain smoothness.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's pixel rate of 196.8 GPixel/s and FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS suggest it can manage 4K gaming, but users should expect to dial settings to high rather than ultra. The CPU's high single-core score of 4,713 in PassMark minimizes the risk of frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with many NPCs. The 24 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the performance impact is likely significant, so users may prefer to use ray tracing at 1080p or disable it at higher resolutions for smoother gameplay.

Overall, this pairing should deliver a satisfying gaming experience at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being possible for less demanding titles. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the percentile scores give confidence that the system is well-balanced for gaming, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX achieves a multi-core score of 35,589 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-core score in the same test is 2,204. In Geekbench, it scores 20,795 multi-core and 2,458 single-core. The average benchmark score is 67,469. The CPU's closest rival, the Intel Xeon w5-3525, scores 67,673, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the 275HX is essentially tied with a workstation Xeon. The AMD EPYC 4484PX scores 67,822, a 0.5% lead, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX scores 67,868, a 0.6% lead. The Intel Xeon 6515P scores 67,006, which the 275HX beats by 0.7%.

The Intel Arc A730M scores 1,732 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 70,352 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 64,693 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 45,592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, scores 45,384, which the A730M beats by 0.5%. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972, beating the A730M by 0.8%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152, which the A730M beats by 1%, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043, beating the A730M by 1%.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting just behind some of the most powerful server and workstation chips, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-tier mobile solution. The combined percentile of 89 indicates that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of laptop configurations in the database. The CPU's dominance is clear; it is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU, though respectable, is closer to the pack in its own category.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX CPU with the Intel Arc A730M GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process. The GPU is a mobile graphics solution from the Alchemist generation, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and built on a 6 nm process. Together, they form a high-performance mobile platform with a combined percentile of 89.

The CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 84th percentile place this build in the upper echelon of laptop performance. The CPU is clearly the standout component, with benchmark scores that rival desktop workstation processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX. The GPU, while not as dominant in its field, still outperforms 84% of all GPUs and offers competitive performance against mid-to-high-end mobile and professional graphics cards. The 12 GB VRAM and 24 RT cores make it a capable part for modern gaming and rendering tasks.

This is not an entry-level or even mid-range laptop; it is a premium mobile workstation or enthusiast gaming machine. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 80 W TDP sum to 135 W, which is reasonable for a high-performance laptop, but the system will likely require robust cooling to sustain peak performance. The overall tier from the percentiles suggests this is a top-tier laptop configuration, suited for users who demand maximum compute power in a portable package.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with a 94th percentile ranking compared to the GPU's 84th percentile. This suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely to be the primary bottleneck, as it will reach its limits before the CPU does. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,713 in PassMark ensures that it can feed the GPU with data quickly, but the GPU's FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS is the limiting factor for raw graphical performance.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will be the star, and the GPU's role is secondary. For tasks that rely heavily on GPU compute, such as machine learning inference or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A730M's 84th percentile performance will be the ceiling. The CPU's 24 threads will rarely be a constraint in these scenarios, as the GPU's 3072 shading units will be the primary workhorse.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strength may help push frame rates higher, but at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's pixel rate of 196.8 GPixel/s will likely become the limiting factor. The 12 GB VRAM is a positive for high-resolution textures, but the GPU's raw compute will still cap performance in demanding titles. Overall, this is a well-balanced system for mixed workloads, but users should be aware that the GPU is the component to watch for gaming performance, while the CPU is the component that delivers exceptional compute performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds